Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Government affecting the media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Government affecting the media
By the press, we mean news media and news agencies, particularly newspapers. This is not exactly the same as the broadcast industry, which basically covers radio and television. Historically, there has not been any written law specifically meant to control the press as an industry. Some general laws concerning contempt of court, obscenity, criminal libel, civil defamation, public incitement of hatred, etc. make specific acts or expressions by journalists illegal, but there has never been a statute explicitly intended to regulate the press in Canada (Osler, 2001, p. 234)..
In the 1970s and early 1980s, the ownership structure of the Canadian press industry was changing fast. A few powerful firms were acquiring many newspapers and beginning to
…show more content…
This was strong evidence that the two corporations were conspiring together to increase their control of Canadian printed media, and their positions in the market became extremely powerful. In particular, Southam now owned "the only English-language daily newspaper in each of Montreal and Ottawa" and Thompson owned "the only daily newspaper" in Winnipeg (p. 234).
Meanwhile, independent newspapers were struggling because competitive conditions in the industry were becoming too much. The Toronto Telegram, Montreal Star, Montréal-Matin, and l'Action all closed during this time (p. 234). At the same time, the corporations were growing bigger and bigger. In January 1980, Thompson bought the FP Publications group and got its hands on eight more newspapers. Together, these two companies (Thompson and Southam) now had control of 58.7 percent of the market (p. 234).
These events caused a great deal of panic in the industry and something had to be done. The government responded with the Royal Commission on Newspapers (i.e. the Kent
…show more content…
However, the author argues that newspapers are not just a product like any other product, and this is for three reasons.
First, newspapers have the job of supplying the general public with information about everything that has been happening in the world. This job is very important in a democracy. We must make sure that the news is being written by many people with different backgrounds and different agendas. If citizens have no choice but to get their information from just a few news agencies, the function and purpose of the news would be put in danger (Osler, 2001, p. 238).
Second, while small newspapers are run by professional journalists who are trying to do their job, huge newspapers tend to be run by tycoons and magnates as a business. To a corporation, maximizing profit from a newspaper is more important than the journalistic quality of the newspaper (p. 238).
Third, newspapers are not just any product; a newspaper represents power and influence over readers and their information and beliefs. If one firm has too large of a market share in the press industry, it also has too much power, and this power could be easily abused (p.
In “Reporting the News” by George C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, and Robert L. Lineberry, the main idea is how the media determines what to air, where to get said stories that will air, how the media presents the news, and the medias effect on the general public. “Reporting The News” is a very strong and detailed article. The authors’ purpose is to inform the readers of what goes on in the news media. This can be inferred by the authors’ tone. The authors’ overall tone is critical of the topics that are covered. The tone can be determined by the authors’ strong use of transitions, specific examples, and phrases or words that indicate analysis. To summarize, first, the authors’ indicate that the media chooses its stories that will air
The issues I choose to talk is the “Canadian Magazine dispute”. I will try to answer the questions one by one.
Michael Parenti (2002) declares media in the United States is no longer “free, independent, neutral and objective.” (p. 60). Throughout his statement, Parenti expresses that media is controlled by large corporations, leaving smaller conglomerates unable to compete. The Telecommunications Act, passed in 1996, restricted “a single company to own television stations serving more than one-third of the U.S. public,” but is now overruled by greater corporations. (p. 61). In his opinion, Parenti reveals that media owners do not allow the publishing of stories that are not beneficial and advantageous. Parenti supports his argument very thoroughly by stating how the plutocracy takes control over media in multiple ways: television, magazines, news/radio broadcasting, and other sources.
As my conclusion of understanding this journey through the history journalism by Kuyperts is that one thing history of newspapers tells us while the structure of the news may change, or the market for the news continues and a formation of highly intelligent journalist will strive to insists that the community receives the type of news that they want to read about.
The Prime Minister of Spain once told an American, “The newspapers in your country seem to be more powerful than the government.” This statement was never more true than in 1898 during the Spanish-American War. The rulers of the New York newspaper empire, Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst, battled against one another in the ultimate test of journalism. With a real war on the horizon, these men fought to produce the most sensational stories Americans had ever read; and, as a result, they brought forth a new age in the American newspaper business, an age of fighting for the little guy, and beating back tyranny one paper at a time.
Self-censorship is perhaps what is most ominous in these cases, journalists and editors do not keep track of notes that could affect business interests, the newspaper owners or their relative...
Bonila, Denise M., and Levy, Beth, Eds. The Power of the Press. H. W. Wilson, 1999.
With an understanding of the theoretical links between economic structures, relations of production, and political systems that protect economic structures in society this case study examines media as a contributor to democracy in Australia as well as a business with economic objectives. This section will provide a short explanation of Fairfax media history and position in 2012 prior to explaining Gina Rinehart’s role in the company. The print sector in Australia has historically exhibited relatively high levels of concentration, dominated by News Corp Australia, Fairfax and APN. The Australian print news media have experienced a long-term trend of a decrease in titles and owners. According to Geoffrey Craig, ‘in 1923 there were as many as
Conflict theory claims that advertising does not sufficiently address issues of inequality in society. (Brime, Roberts, Lie, Rytina 2013, p.462) There are five major media outlets that form a monopoly of the media industry in Canada: CTVglobalmedia Inc. owned by Bell Canada, Rogers Communications Inc. Controlled by the Rogers family, Shaw Communications controlled by the Shaw family, CBC/Radio Canada, and Quebecor Inc. Controlled by the Péladeau family. (Brime, Roberts, Lie, Rytina 2013, p.462-463) CBC/Radio Canada is the only publicly owned media company in Canada, whereas, approximately 90% of the media in Canada is privately owned. (Brime, Roberts, Lie, Rytina 2013, p.464) This allows for 90% of advertising content to be chosen by wealthy corporations. In an American study, 93% of newspaper editors admitted to advertisers attempting to influence news stories and 37% admitted that advertisers have influenced their stories. (Brime, Roberts, Lie, Rytina 2013,
The phrase “the power of the press” is used often, but what exactly is the power of the press? Since the beginning of news reporting, it’s been known that what actually gets into the news reports is monitored and carefully picked by higher authorities. What isn’t widely known, however, is that the media can use specific wording and phrases that, on the surface, look like normal news coverage, but are actually a technique of the media to control the images people see and the words they hear and read. From this, people then form their ideals, but are these actually ideals of those people if the media from which they based them off of was controlled to begin with? It is the power of the press to control and manipulate the public’s ideals by what is released in the media.
. A study of Minnesota newspapers found that group newspapers with headquarters outside of the state carried significantly less conflict reporting about local government than did independent papers or group newspapers. This is important to note because critics have said that group ownership will lead to a reduction in the diversity of ideas and the use of economic strength to force out competition. In terms of quality, If different newspaper ownership types – independently owned newspapers, privately held group newspapers, publicly held group newspapers – pursue different goals, which are reflected ultimately in the newspapers content. It was found that coverage of local and nonlocal business news were more favorable, and that group editors were more likely to emphasize profit as a top corporate goal than were indepent editors.
Much is being discovered when the public, also known as the consumers and recipients of the news, share their views on journalistic practices. One might suggest that traditional journalism has, in due course, come to an end. Although, there are definitely problems that the public runs into with public journalism taking over. A few of those arguments include their content, the journalists, and the effects that it has on their public audience.
Rupert Murdoch is by any description one of the most famous and influential Media giant who combines two main passions in his life: a desire for money and a thirst for power. The first step towards his career Rupert has begun in Melbourne, Australia, growing further in the United Kingdom and other parts of the world. Buying properties in the UK such as the News of the World and the Sun was not the limit for his career ladder, he has become the part of prestigious London Times. True entrepreneur is a right classification for him since being a head of News Corporation, which is the largest American multinational mass media corporation. However, Damian Reece, in his article “Public opinion and time are against Rupert
It’s a question that keeps floating around in the public sphere: is print advertising and newspapers dead? The world is becoming more and more fast-paced and although, our want and need for the up-to-date news and breaking stories has not changed, the way in which we consume it has. This background report investigates and explains the downfall of the newspaper and the technological shift to online news. It will also discuss differing opinions of this relevant topic of the future of journalism from a range of reliable primary sources and investigative data.
The introduction of the internet to modern society has brought about a new age of information relation. Since there is no longer a need to wait until the next print day, news from all over the world is available at a person’s fingertips within hours or even minutes of the event. With this advent of such easily accessible information, new problems for the news media have also arisen. Aside from potentially losing good economic standing because newspapers are no longer being purchased in the quantities they used to be, the credibility of the information itself is also put into question. No one would argue that credibility of news sources is unimportant, but there is a discrepancy in what takes precedence; economy and speed or getting the information out correctly at the first publishing by taking the time to make sure all facts are checked. The importance of having a system of checks on all information submitted is paramount. People trust what they read and believe it to be so without always questioning. If all information were to not be checked thoroughly, there would be instances where people read an article only for information included to be wrong and they go on believing such information. This can be very dangerous as misinformed people make misinformed decisions. With an increase in errors being made by citizen bloggers and even major publications, many are worried that journalistic ethics and credibility in the news media are being sacrificed in order to maintain swiftness in the news circuit and to retain personal profits. Though getting information to the masses quickly is a major part of the media’s importance, this should not mean that the credibility of that information being presented should be sacrificed for it...