Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Limitations to the bystander effect
Bystander effect in society
Bystander effect in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Sunmi Famule
Hour 1
Psychology Paper
Imagine that you were walking down a crowded hallway and you stumble upon a person passed out in the middle of the hall. You are not the only one who sees this person but you notice no one else is helping. Would you help the person or keep walking? Your answer is probably “of course I would help the person, it’s the human thing to do”. If your answer closely relates to the given one you are mostly likely incorrect. According to studies done by both amateur and professional psychologist you are more likely to keep walking than help that fallen person. This is something known as the Bystander Effect. The bystander effect is a phenomenon where no help is offered to a victim due to the presence of others and
…show more content…
the unspoken idea that everyone (not just one person) is responsible for taking actions in the given situation. Unfortunately this is not the only way people’s thoughts and behaviors are affect by social situation. Social situation influence individual’s thoughts and behaviors due to the bystander effect, deindividuation, and conformity. The bystander effect is a phenomenon we are all familiar with, though many don’t know it.
In a study done by both Bibb Latane and John Darley, they measured the amount of time it took individuals to respond and act in a given situation based on the number of people present in the room (Bystander). They found that when individuals were in rooms by themselves and smoke filled the room, there was a 75 percent chance of the person reporting the smoke (Bystander). Whereas, when people were placed in rooms which contained other participants there was only a 38 percent chance of the people reporting the incident (Bystander). This unfortunately is not the only study which comes to a similar conclusion. A social experiment done by teenagers at a local high school shows the same thing. The students went around the school and asked their classmates and teachers if they would help a student that was found passed out in the halls (YouTube). All of those who were interviewed said yes they would. When this situation was tested, it proved the students to be liars. Over 70 (if not more) students walked over the body of the passed out girl (YouTube). Some even took pictures and laughed (YouTube). No one helped the girl because they all believed that it was not their job due to the presence of others. Looking at everyday life it is easy to see how the bystander effect can not only be applied to big situations such as the ones listed above, but also, to small ones. Such as, walking down a hall and walking by a piece if trash someone dropped. Most people (if not all) will continue walking and refuse to pick up the trash because it was not their doing. Perhaps this is a contributing factor to the fact that many people go without help in emergency
situations. Another way social situations influence people’s behavior is through deindividuation. Deindividuation is the decrease of self-awareness in a group. This does not always happen whenever a group is gathered together. It happens however in extreme situations and when people develop pungent feeling for or against something. An example of this is the military. When people join the military they are stripped of their individuality (goodtherapy). They receive the same training, and the same treatment as everyone else (goodtherapy). They no longer see themselves as people/individuals. They do as their commander says, they don’t think for themselves. Another example is a hardcore sports fan. A study done by Paul Bernhardt showed that testosterone levels increases by 20 percent in a sports fan when their team wins and decreases by 20 percent when they lose (Sports). This makes the fan more susceptible to deindividuation because they often associate themselves to the team (Sports). This can cause them to lose themselves in the emotions of the event and act in out of the ordinary ways because they attach themselves to the fan thereby losing who they really are. Deindividuation can help explain why many who belong to a fandom often react strong to a person who does not like the fandom. It can help to explain why they often say mean things to the offender. Conformity is another thing that influences people in social situations. Conformity is changing ones behavior or action in attempts to fit in with others. Our psychology class tested this phenomenon by having all students except one give the wrong answer to a question (Classroom). The student who had the right answer had to then choose to conform or stick with their guts. We found that the student with the correct answer conformed to the group (Classroom). Conformity is most likely to occur in situations where an individual believes they are surrounded by those who are more intelligent that they. This is most likely why many students often comply with ideas they do not agree with when they are in groups.
The bystander effect refers to the tendency for an observer of an emergency to withhold aid if the:
... so is sacrificial to one’s rights, it puts them in an undesirable position where they may be harmed as well, and success at being an upstander is not guaranteed. Perpetrators tyrannize those who are unable to stand up for themselves; like how predators seek out the vulnerable preys. Hence, instead of having bystanders to stand up for the victim, the victim should stand up for him/herself. In addition, unlike what Lehrman believes, bystanders are not the most dangerous to the victim; the perpetrator is. Saying that bystanders are the most dangerous is is like saying that if one witnesses something, then he/she is a criminal. Consequently, saying that bystanders should stand up for victims against perpetrators is illogical and naive. Concisely, it is not another’s responsibility to ensure one’s safety and wellness; instead, it is one’s responsibility to do so.
The bystander effect is a the phenomenon in which the more people are are around the less likely someone will step-in or help in a given situation. THe most prominent example of this is the tragic death of Kitty Genovese. In march of 1964 Kitty genovese was murdered in the alley outside of her apartment. That night numerous people reported hearing the desperate cries for help made by Kitty Genovese who was stabbed to death. Her screams ripped through the night and yet people walked idly by her murder. No one intervened and not even a measly phone call to the police was made.
Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, “The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people.” We are All Bystanders by Jason Marsh and Dacher Keltner is an article that reflects on the psychological and social phenomenon that refers to cases in which people do not offer any assistance or help to a victim. Studies say that a person's personality can determine how they react to a bystander situation. In a book called, The Heart of Altruism, author Kristen Monroe writes the altruistic perspective. Altruistic people are strongly connected to other humans and have a concern for the well-being of others. Markus Zusak’s The Book Thief exemplifies the bystander theory through Liesel and
Latane and Darley (1968) investigated the phenomenon known as the bystander effect and staged an emergency situation where smoke was pumped into the room participants was in. Results showed that 75% of participants who were alone reported the smoke, whereas only 38% of participants working in groups of three reported (Latane & Darley, 1968). Their findings provide evidence for the negative consequence of the diffusion of responsibility. In line with the social influence principle, bystanders depend on reactions of others to perceive a situation as an emergency and are subsequently less likely to help. Latane and Darley’s findings were also supported in recent research: Garcia and colleagues (2002) found that even priming a social context by asking participants to imagine themselves in a group could decrease helping behaviour. It can be contended that these findings are examples of social proof where individuals believe actions of the group is correct for the situation, or examples of pluralistic ignorance where individuals outwardly conform because they incorrectly assumed that a group had accepted the norm (Baumeister & Bushman,
Bystander effect and obedience to authority are theories that can be compared and contrasted. Bystander effect is, for example, when someone is publicly in need and even though there are many people passing by or in the area, no one stops to help because they’ve seen no one else stop to help. In a video called The Bystander Effect they did an experiment to test the theory by having an actor lay by the steps of a busy area in Liverpool and moan “Help me”. The actor, Peter, was passed by many people who glanced his way, but didn’t stop to help even after 20 minutes of him yelling for help. Next they had a lady lay on the steps and after 4 minutes and 30 seconds a man finally comes over to help and forms what a narrator refers to as a new group with new rules to actually help. After the man comes to her assistance so does another lady and then more people follow. In the next part of the experiment they have Peter come back dressed as business man and it only takes 6 seconds before someone comes to help him. A real life example of bystander effect is the police brutality incident that happened at Spring Valley High School where a 15 year old girl was tackled and assaulted by a police officer for no reason that justified that treatment. In the video her peers and teacher just stood by and watched it happen without stepping in or speaking up. I think even
The bystander effect plays a key role in society today. More and more people ignore a person in distress.
Have you ever stopped and wondered what causes society to be selfish and not help others when they are in need? Throughout the life existence of humans we have always tried to figure out the inner workings of the brain and what causes us human beings to behave or do the things we do, but to this day it still remains a mystery. During the last few centuries, however, great steps have been made in understanding why we behave and think the way we do. Lauren Slater, a psychologist and author, is widely recognized for her book “Opening Skinner’s Box,” in which she describes in detail some of the greatest and most influential psychological experiments of the twentieth century. All of the experiments mentioned in this empowering book discuss the relationship
Most people just complain about the wickedness and the corruption of society, and they do not realize that they are contributing to the problem by doing nothing to stop it and just being mere bystanders. Bystanders are those individuals that do not take part in events despite being present during those times. In spite of the consequences that it entails being a bystander, this kind of behavior is usually driven by the desire to avoid problems. In order to avoid this misleading mentality, many philosophers and social activists have advocated against people being bystanders. An individual should not be a bystander because being a bystander is morally incorrect, inhuman, and harmful.
One of the strengths is providing a new insight into bystander effect. The study argued that researchers have previously neglected the potential benefit of bystanders and thus, the study provided a new horizon by proving reversed bystander effect through experiment. This allows us to be aware of the fact that someone may be providing help merely due to impression management. This arouses a doubt on whether the one who provides help is genuinely concerned about the needs of the victims, or one is just motivated by upholding his/her reputation when surrounded by a crowd. Besides, carrying out a manipulation check right after this experiment is beneficial to this study as well....
On March 13, 1964 a girl by the name of Catherine Susan Genovese “Kitty” was being stabbed to death outside her apartment. Many of her neighbors heard her cry for help but no one took action in view of the fact that they didn’t want to put themselves in danger. Detectives investigated the death of Genovese and discovered that no fewer than 38 of her neighbors had witnessed at least one of her killer’s three attacks but had neither come to her aid nor called the police. How could this happen? The people who were stunned by watching Mrs. Genovese being stabbed to death instead of taking action is the stimulus for research in the psychological phenomenon known as the “Bystander Effect.”
Darley, J. M. & Latané, B. (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8, 377–383
Martin Gansberg's "Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police" is about a case where a man stabbed a woman three time separated instances; in front of audience of 38 men and woman who did nothing to help the defenseless woman. They all had sorry excuses for apathy of the situation even when the woman yelled that she was dying. They said "’ I didn't want to get involved’" and "’We went to the window to see what was happening’" he said, "’but the light from our bedroom made it difficult to see the street.’" The wife, still apprehensive, added: "’I put out the light and we were able to see better.’" (Gansberg) But in Stanley Milgram and Paul Hollander's "Paralyzed Witnesses" they give reasons as to why these law abiding bystanders got paralyzed and watched as if it were a show of gladiators in the great Coliseum of Rome. As Stanley Milgram and Paul Hollander State “Modern societies are organized as t...
In America, social progress is based on the knowledge of the people of what is actually happening and actions taken by those who are affected. In every American life, there is the aspect of wanting to be a part of a movement and play a role in society. But, sometimes there are those people who wish to just watch and let everything go by them. These people are the bystanders, and they play a major role in how social progress evolves. By mobilizing the bystander, either the up stander or the resister will gain the upper hand, and this is shown in American literature and history.
A bystander is a person who is present and overlooks an event but takes no part within it. If someone was to be lying on a sidewalk unconscious and another person walked by and ignores the fact that there is a human being lying passed out in front of them, it makes them a bystander. However, bystanders are present in many different varieties. A possible bystander could be someone who hears a conversation occurring about breaking into a house, if the person decides not to say anything and later the house gets broken into it makes them a bystander. A psychological study done by Bibb Latané and John Darley discovered that “…people are less likely to offer help when they are in a group than when they are alone” (Burkley). This discovery can be