A bystander is a person who is present and overlooks an event but takes no part within it. If someone was to be lying on a sidewalk unconscious and another person walked by and ignores the fact that there is a human being lying passed out in front of them, it makes them a bystander. However, bystanders are present in many different varieties. A possible bystander could be someone who hears a conversation occurring about breaking into a house, if the person decides not to say anything and later the house gets broken into it makes them a bystander. A psychological study done by Bibb Latané and John Darley discovered that “…people are less likely to offer help when they are in a group than when they are alone” (Burkley). This discovery can be …show more content…
referred to as the bystander theory. The witnesses wanted to intervene but were intimidated by what the other people around would think if they got involved. For the good of society if a person is to witness anything that can be harmful or threatening it should be their moral obligation to take some sort of action. A person should not put themselves into a dangerous situation, but if something can be prevented than action should be taken in order to do so. Bystander intervention is a simple way that can help prevent crime and help people in need. It should be a person’s moral obligation to be an active bystander in order to benefit the needs of others who are powerless in a situation and prevent crime. It is realized that the opposing arguments to being an active bystander is that it is not a person’s responsibility to create any involvement in a problem that is not their own.
However, that opposing argument can be found as hypocritical. If a person was getting robbed in an ally and they saw many witnesses taking no action they would likely be upset by the fact of no one is offering any assistance to them. Bystanders should put themselves into the shoes of the person in need and ask themselves how they would expect others to respond if they were the one in need. Often time’s bystanders take no intervention because of the diffusion of responsibility. “When there are four or more people who are bystanders to an emergency situation, the likelihood that at least one of them will help is just 31%” (Gaille). Another statistic shows that 85% of people who were bystanders would intervene if they knew or at least though they were the only person present in the situation. Often the only thing keeping people from intervening in bystander situations are other people. It is important for bystanders to understand the statistics of the people around them in order to create action because often times they do not realize that if they were to intervene other people would likely support them in the situation. Bystanders need to make it a personal responsibility to intervene in situations for the good of other. If people were to always take action the amount of bullying, sexual harassment, crime, and many other significant issues within a society would drastically
decrease. Within nearly every school across America bullying is present and being an active bystander can put a stop to it. Bullying often occurs publically at school and is never stopped. A victim is often picked on publically because of the embarrassment it can portray on an individual and the power it can present a bully. “Even though most bystanders don’t like to watch bullying, less than 20% try to stop it. This happens frequently because they don’t know what to do” (frfp.pa). If a person is to witness bullying and does not know what to do they should not ignore the situation. A person does not have to confront the bully to make themselves an active bystander. An active bystander can do many different things in order to help a victim. A simple plan of action can be to seek attention from a higher authority like a faculty of the school. Bullies portray themselves as a powerful individual at school and many bystanders may possibly not intervene because of the fear they have of becoming a new target for the bully. Bullying has become a leading factor of teenage suicide in the United States. Many cases have been reported that the bullying took place for many months prior to the suicide and it was witnessed various times by many different individuals but there was never any intervention. The stake of person’s life should not lie within the hands of people that are too afraid to stand up for what is right. Bystander intervention should become a must across schools in America because of the help it can provide teenagers who are not strong enough to stand up for themselves. Another reason that people should make it their moral obligation to become an active bystander is because it can help prevent crime before it occurs. Sexual assault is another issue that can be stopped by people being active bystanders. Sexual assault usually occurs in public situation like parties. The perpetrator often finds a target that has been influenced by alcohol and takes advantage of their lack of awareness and judgment. In many cases of sexual assault the perpetrator claims that consent was given due to the actions of the victim. Specifically, the victim did not refrain from the removal of clothes or the victim did not tell the person to ever stop. Sexual assault occurs when verbal consent is not given. Any action or reason other than verbally acceptance to sex is not consent. Bystander intervention for sexual assault sometimes does not occur because people do not realize the severity of the problem occurring. “If someone is incapacitated due to alcohol or other drugs, even if the individual says yes, it is considered sexual assault” (stepupprogram.org). A bystander has many options on deciding on their actions in a situation in order to make them an active bystander. A bystander can ask around for any information about the perpetrator and the victim. If they were to find any of the victims friends it is possible that the friends would immediately know if a real problem was occurring and in that case a proper intervention can occur. A bystander has a responsibility at a party for a victim that is powerless. If a victim is too intoxicated and is being taken advantage of it is in the reliance of other people for their safety. A bystander that does not intervene is allowing a person to be violated and used because of their failure to intervene. If a person fails and is incapable to help themselves it makes it the responsibilities of the bystanders to take the correct action and give assistance to the person in need. Bystanders have shown that in public situations they fail to intervene because of the diffusion of responsibility. They have shown that the presence of others in a public situation decreases their chances of intervention. Bystanders however should make it their moral obligation and personal responsibility to intervene in a situation that requires attention for the better good of society. A society that can witness a person being bullied till their own suicide or that can watch a person be taken advantage of and sexually assaulted is sickening. As people living together on in the same community these actions should be taken for the dramatic changes that it can make. If bystanders were always to intervene when necessary there would be endless amounts of benefit to people everywhere including the prevention of sexual assault and decreasing numbers in bullying and teenage suicide.
The bystander effect refers to the tendency for an observer of an emergency to withhold aid if the:
... so is sacrificial to one’s rights, it puts them in an undesirable position where they may be harmed as well, and success at being an upstander is not guaranteed. Perpetrators tyrannize those who are unable to stand up for themselves; like how predators seek out the vulnerable preys. Hence, instead of having bystanders to stand up for the victim, the victim should stand up for him/herself. In addition, unlike what Lehrman believes, bystanders are not the most dangerous to the victim; the perpetrator is. Saying that bystanders are the most dangerous is is like saying that if one witnesses something, then he/she is a criminal. Consequently, saying that bystanders should stand up for victims against perpetrators is illogical and naive. Concisely, it is not another’s responsibility to ensure one’s safety and wellness; instead, it is one’s responsibility to do so.
Do Bystanders have a responsibility to intervene in crimes? This is a question we tend to ask ourselves very often. In the texts To Kill a Mockingbird and “Stand Up”, one can see the dangers of intervening in crimes. Bystanders are innocent and shouldn't risk their own lives for someone they don't even know. Being a bystander doesn't make you guilty, because it's your choice weather to help and stick up for someone or not.
All in all, if we do not stand up then we only affirm the perpetrators, and if there are too many that affirm perpetrators instead of standing up for the victim, bystanders can prove to be more dangerous than the perpetrators.
Although it may be natural human behavior when stripped from civilization, how the boys' behavior has changed morally based on their situation is the main part of the destruction on the island. One thing is that the boys on the island were not willing to go after and help each other. The bystander effect engaged, they let all these horrible things happen to each other without taking action to stop it and get things under control. This quote shows us an example of how the bystander effect was happening while Jack and his tribe were killing Simon: “Again the blue-white scar jagged above them and the sulphurous explosion beat down. The littluns screamed and blundered about, fleeing from the edge of the forest, and one of them broke the ring of biguns in
The bystander effect is a the phenomenon in which the more people are are around the less likely someone will step-in or help in a given situation. THe most prominent example of this is the tragic death of Kitty Genovese. In march of 1964 Kitty genovese was murdered in the alley outside of her apartment. That night numerous people reported hearing the desperate cries for help made by Kitty Genovese who was stabbed to death. Her screams ripped through the night and yet people walked idly by her murder. No one intervened and not even a measly phone call to the police was made.
Although people can fear an outcome of telling the truth or standing up for what they believe is right, being a bystander in a poor situation doesn’t exempt someone from innocence. Whether it involves a murder or telling the truth, if someone knows it is wrong and does nothing to take part in what’s going on they are no better than the ones involved in the conflict. In To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee and The Lottery by Shirley Jackson, both stories involve bystanders. A bystander is not innocent when they do nothing about the problem going on around them.
Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, “The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people.” We are All Bystanders by Jason Marsh and Dacher Keltner is an article that reflects on the psychological and social phenomenon that refers to cases in which people do not offer any assistance or help to a victim. Studies say that a person's personality can determine how they react to a bystander situation. In a book called, The Heart of Altruism, author Kristen Monroe writes the altruistic perspective. Altruistic people are strongly connected to other humans and have a concern for the well-being of others. Markus Zusak’s The Book Thief exemplifies the bystander theory through Liesel and
Arguing that their inaction was immoral to their responsibilities as a community will not offer a rebuttal to the argument that people will not help their fellows. Social proof and pluralistic ignorance give us some sort of reconciliation in the contradiction of Kitty’s case. How a group of people decent people did not give help. They had the moral responsibility to do something, as long as they are doing something to help the person they are fulfilling their responsibility and obligation to do
“I would like to suggest that there are usually no bystanders as such—as a trait or as a personality type, just as there are mostly no perpetrator or rescuer personality types”(Bar-On). Bar-On states that personality types are not relevant when categorizing a person into o...
The bystander effect plays a key role in society today. More and more people ignore a person in distress.
One of the strengths is providing a new insight into bystander effect. The study argued that researchers have previously neglected the potential benefit of bystanders and thus, the study provided a new horizon by proving reversed bystander effect through experiment. This allows us to be aware of the fact that someone may be providing help merely due to impression management. This arouses a doubt on whether the one who provides help is genuinely concerned about the needs of the victims, or one is just motivated by upholding his/her reputation when surrounded by a crowd. Besides, carrying out a manipulation check right after this experiment is beneficial to this study as well....
What makes a good person good? According to WikiHow, "We should learn to define our own morals ourselves. One of the simplest ways to do so is to love others, and treat them as you would like to be treated. Try to think of others before yourself. Even doing small things daily will greatly enrich and improve your life, and the lives of others around you." This quote shows us what we need to do in order to be what society thinks as, “good". In order to be a good person, you have to do good and moral things in your society consistently. However people might think that by doing one good thing once in a while will automatically make you a “good person”, but in reality it doesn’t.
Darley, J. M. & Latané, B. (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8, 377–383
A topic I believe wasn’t discussed to the extent needed in class during the discussion was the topic of Perpetrator vs. Instigator. Some questions I had prepared were unable to make it out due to the short nature of our class and the speed of our discussion when the issue of Perpetrator vs. Instigator was involved. My questions were “How much of Macbeth’s actions were a result of Lady Macbeth?” and “How does this connect back to our Perpetrator vs. Instigator argument?” This is my opinion. The instigator of a crime is worse because they have used a person for their own gain as well as have turned someone potentially pure into an agent of evil. If you’re a perpetrator, you do the dirty work, you put yourself on the line to get the task done; making you as about as useful as a human shield. Because you’re a