Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The evolution of horror movies
Violence in movies
The evolution of the horror genre
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The evolution of horror movies
It’s hard to imagine going to see a horror movie today and not seeing some kind of violent and gory death, this was not the case for earlier horror films. When the horror genre began to make a name for itself back in the early 1900s, filmmakers got a lot of pull back from the Production Code Administration. From the beginning the horror genre was considered one of “the problem genres” (Prince) and was heavily scrutinized by the PCA. One of the main issues the PCA found with the horror genre was the depiction of violence in its films. The Production Code stated that “Brutal killings are not to be presented in detail” (Maltby). Because of this, filmmakers had to go about shooting these films in ways that more alluded to violence, than actually …show more content…
One example of this is Robert Wise’s 1945 film The Body Snatcher. In the correspondence between the filmmakers and the PCA, the PCA expressed their concerns with the film by saying the first draft of the scrip was “unacceptable under the provisions of the code” because of the subject matter dealing with “grave-robbing, dissecting bodies, and picking bodies” (Wise, Letter 2). The PCA stated that “before the basic story could be approved” they would have to make some changes to the script “to replace the objectionable matter” (Wise, Letter 2). The issue with dead bodies was a reoccurring issue with the PCA, it wasn’t until the filmmakers made some revisions to the scrip on this subject matter that the PCA was willing to give any kind of approval. Though the PCA found issues with The Body Snatcher subject matter, the film didn’t seems to be as “violent” or as “gruesome” as earlier films like the Bride of Frankenstein. It seems that during the 30s and 40s PCA were very hard on films that planned to show violent acts in their films and advised filmmakers that if they wanted these films to be approved they would have to be creative in the way they showed these violent
The Beauty of Bodysnatching written by Burch Druin is a fascinating biography of Astley Cooper, an English Surgeon, and Anatomist, who gained worldwide fame in support of his contribution to Vascular Surgery and a further area of expertise. The extract gives a reflective insight into Cooper’s contribution to study of Anatomy and medicine. Cooper enjoyed the job of body snatching, which helped him to conduct a series of discoveries that were important for the future study and understanding of Physiology. In the Romantic era, when prettiness or horror was a sensitive matter and extensive concern at that time many physicians discouraged surgery, but Cooper passionately practiced it.
2. According to Sobchack, contemporary screen violence greatly differs than portrayals of violence in years past. Today, violent scenes are careless and lack significance because we as audiences have become calloused and desensitized to any acts of violence. She states that there is “no grace or benediction attached to violence. Indeed, its very intensity seems diminished” (Sobchack 432). Senseless violence, gruesome acts, and profound amounts of gore are prevalent in movies today, and because even this is not enough, it must be accompanied by loud blasts and noise, constantly moving scenes to keep audiences stimulated and large quantities of violence for viewers to enjoy what they are watching. Decades ago, it was the story that was engaging to audiences and filmmaking was an art.
The code, which was written by a Catholic priest, was approved by Hays, and then handed over to a ‘staunch lay Catholic’ Joseph Breen, who acted as head interpreter of/for the PCA. Why the PCA is relative to this class: The Production Code Administration marks a huge point in the film industry timeline – for the first time, it was a law that all (or, should I say most) movies had to comply with, or else a hefty $25,000 fine could be enforced. These guidelines that ultimately made up the PCA reigns over our modern films in today’s world, only now we have them rated G, PG, PG-13 etc., thus, movies can be made with content that the Catholic religion may or may not be ok with, and there aren’t any $25,000 fines being handed out – why? They comply with “PG-13” rating guidelines, etc.
Themes in the Novel and Movie Adaptation of James Cain’s Mildred Pierce. In contemporary film making, “Hollywood-ization” generally refers to the re-creation of a classic work in a form more vulgar and sexually explicit than the original in an effort to boost movie attendance. After all, sexuality and violence sell. However, from the mid-1930’s to the 1950’s, “Hollywood-ization” referred to the opposite case where controversial books had to be purified to abide by the Production Code of 1934.
Violent scenes and scenarios are now a common go-to for movies, books, comics, and much more.
...jective, then the parents also need to be subjective and judge whether or not their child should be able to see the film in question. However, with films, such as 2013’s raunchy The Wolf of Wall Street, containing record setting language, abundant amounts of nudity, and a gratuitous quantity of drug use, continuously pushing the limits and boundaries of what can be seen in a movie theatre, the MPAA has to not only classify what is in films, but make sure they are keeping kids safe and restricting the limits filmmakers can go to to make sure their motion picture can fit into the most financially suitable rating. The MPAA is not doing its job to keep the undeveloped minds of the youth of America from seeing the things that they are unable to handle and is creating a reality in which lives do not carry meaning, morals are not upheld, and life is just like the movies.
...re as it brings back memories from our childhood. King simply claims that horror movies have a “dirty job to do,” the adrenalin rush of the screams and unexpected outcomes. (King, 2007, p. 457) Kings (2007) answer to Di Muzio (2006) on whether it is morally permissible to indulge in gruesome forms of entertainment would be that the perception lies solely to the beholder and their judgment towards the genre.
The two combined to form the PCA, headed by Catholic layman, Joseph Breen. The PCA was the first censorship authority to truly enforce a set of rules, “The MPPDA agreed to show only films that carried the PCA seal of approval and the studios voluntarily gave the PCA the authority to review and delete morally objectionable material from both the final script and the final cut of the film” (filmmakeriq.com). These restrictions made producing films like Scarface a constant struggle against the PCA. Scarface is a violent, action-packed gangster film that centers around characters representing real life organized crime leaders. The film was required to include an opening subtitle which indicated that the film was not intended to glorify these criminals but to condemn
The genre of horror when associated to film, it reflects on a vast variety of issues but when examined for the cultural significance it is narrower to what the aim is. This review surveys multiple scholarly sources from different aspects of the purpose of horror films. This literature review justifies that horror is derived from the fear and guilt within our psychological minds. I will argue that the cultural significance of this genre relates back to the emotional appeals that are conjured up when viewing these films.
Unfortunately, American movie audiences have become jaded connoisseurs of special effects gore. In the hands of the entertainment industry, violence has become just another pandering trick.
In the short story “Why We Crave Horror Movies” Stephen King accurately states, “ the horror movie is innately conservative, even reactionary.” What this is saying is no matter how bloody or how intense the movie gets, people could always enjoy a little horror in their day. Some movies have those scenes where some person gets injured then killed and that really gets the blood pumping in the viewers and for some people, that essential normality that cures the craziness. To continue, King makes another good point in the short story, “Why We Crave Horror“ and correctly claims, “we may be removed from the beauty of a Robert Redford or a Diana Ross, we are still light years away from true ugliness.” This quote from King’s story states that no matter what happens to people it could always be solved with a quick thrill from a horror movie and that humans do this to have fun with normality. Despite the fact that people seem that it's normal to watch someone get butchered or decapitated but, people can also have some fun and excitement for the
What then do we make of American horror movies? In the canon of horror pictures they almost always come second in respect to foreign horror movies and any American horror film that is considered to be artful is the one with the most aesthetic distance. Upscale slashers like Johnathan Demme's The Silence of the Lambs (1991) or David Fincher's Seven (1995) are both gruesome and bloody borrowing many of the same shock techniques as their lower budget counterparts (for example, Russell Mulchahy's Sevenish thriller Resurrection (1999)), both focus on the body and its violation, either through sexual means or violent means, and both feature villains who fit easily into Carol Clover's assessment as "distinctly male; his fury is unmistakably sexual in both roots and expression."
Modern day horror films are very different from the first horror films which date back to the late nineteenth century, but the goal of shocking the audience is still the same. Over the course of its existence, the horror industry has had to innovate new ways to keep its viewers on the edge of their seats. Horror films are frightening films created solely to ignite anxiety and panic within the viewers. Dread and alarm summon deep fears by captivating the audience with a shocking, terrifying, and unpredictable finale that leaves the viewer stunned. (Horror Films)
Horror movies have been part of mainstream cinema since the early 1930s when films such as Dracula and Frankenstein were created. As the horror genre evolved, so did the stories in the films. Friday the 13th (Marcus Nipsel, 2009) is a very good example of this evolution. Even though it is a remake, Friday the 13th changed the way horror movies were seen by the audience. The ideas and theory behind this slasher sub-genre of horror films can be summed up in a book. Carol Clover, an American professor of film studies, wrote a book in 1992 entitled Men, Women, and Chainsaws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film in which she described the horror film genre. In a chapter entitled “Her Body, Himself”, Clover describes how weapons play a very important role in horror movies as well as explaining her Final Girl theory. Her book’s ideas changed not only academic notions but also popular beliefs on horror films. The 2009 remake of Friday the 13th implies that Carol Clover’s ideas about 80s slasher films, including male tormentors, the importance of weapons, and the Final Girl, have stayed the same through the years.
Wyatt, Justin. “The Stigma of X: Adult Cinema and the Institution of the MPAA Ratings System.” Controlling Hollywood: Censorship and Regulation in the Studio Era. Ed. Matthew Bernstein. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1999. (238-264).