Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of the Battle of Algiers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of the Battle of Algiers
Gillo Pontecorvo’s masterful film The Battle of Algiers artfully depicts the violent Algerian uprising from 1954-1962 against French colonial rule in the city of Algiers. Pontecorvo’s film is one of the most historically accurate representations about decolonization in the 20th century. When the film was first released, it was banned in France due to its controversial subject and realistic depiction of the violent methods both used during the Algerian uprising. Pontecorvo is brutally honest in his depiction of the atrocities that the FLN and French authorities committed during the battle. The Battle of Algiers is a stunning example of how the transition to decolonization does not occur peacefully. Whilst the FLN initiated the Algerian uprising in the 1950s, the Mau Mau were also fighting for independence in Kenya. The FLN and the Mau Mau employ the same ideology of nationalism as a justification for their violent actions. The FLN and the Mau Mau both show little regard for European life and attack public places without remorse. In the mid-20th century, the ideology of decolonization and independence grew rapidly among the colonized. A vast majority of rebellions were based upon nationalist ideologies and grew out of a need for violence. During these …show more content…
wars for independence, both the colonized and the colonizer performed heinous acts of torture against the other. The Battle of Algiers also depicts the issues brought forth by imperialism and colonization regarding the endless struggle of people to achieve their independence at whatever the cost.
French Martinique philosopher and revolutionary Frantz Fanon states in his book, The Wretched of the Earth, that decolonization is inherently fraught with violence and cannot occur peacefully. Fanon’s ideology that violence is a necessity for decolonization is evident in The Battle of Algiers where the FLN’s attacks on European and Muslim civilians and the French authorities use of torture to extract information resulted in a brutal conflict that lasted for nearly eight years and claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of
people. The film encapsulates the ideology of nationalism and the impact that it had on the members of the FLN and other nations fighting for independence. Throughout the movie, Ali La Pointe interacts with various members of the FLN of all ages and genders. As the film progresses, the growth of guerrilla warfare and the nationalist movement resulted in the increasing participation of women in the movement. In The Battle of Algiers, women played a pivotal role in the FLN due to their ability to blend in with large crowds and men’s assumption that women stayed away from violence. One of the most disturbing scenes of the film was when three women placed bombs in three public areas across the city and killed innocent French civilians. This scene reiterates Pontecorvo’s attempts to not romanticize the FLN as freedom fighters but recognize that both sides committed atrocities during the war.
It is 1957 and the Algerian war is at its prime as the FLN fight against an elite troop of ruthless French paratroopers. The Battle of Algiers is a portion of the Algerian war which was fought in order for Algeria to gain independence from France. The film starts off with the torturing of an old man to gain information on where the last of the freedom fighters, Ali Pointe is hiding. A large segment of the film is shot in flashbacks focusing on the past of Ali Pointe. Pointe was a ruffian with theft and drugs on his record; he joined the militants to assist in getting rid of the problems in Algeria associated with the French. With the flashbacks the film tells the struggles of the insurgents and the persistence of the French to end the war. It shows the transformation of the insurgency into a full out revolution. When the flashbacks ends and it is now present time Ali Pointe, along with the rest of the FLN leaders captured are beheaded. Through this, the FLN reciprocate and the insurgency becomes a full on national revolution with growth in numbers and support. The film ends with Algeria gaining the independence it strived for in 1962. The film is important in understanding asymmetric conflicts because despite being the weaker side, Algeria had proved itself to be much stronger than the French and had its newfound independence to show for it.
Algeria had revolted against the French colonies many times, but did not succeed with overthrowing them. Under the French rule
In Todd Shepard’s work Voices of Decolonization, the featured documents provide keen insight into the geopolitical environment of the era of decolonization (1945-1965) and the external and internal pressures on the relationships between colonial nations and the territories that they held dominion over (Shepard 10). Decolonization is the result of a combination of national self-determination and the establishment of functional international institutions composed of independent sovereign nations united towards common goals. As decolonization progressed, it intersected with points of significant sociopolitical tension between colonies and the nations that colonized them. Some of these moments of tension came in the form of progressive ideals held by international agencies which colonial nations were allied with, the revolt of colonized populations against their standing government in favor of independence, and in moral and political conflicts that arose when decolonization takes a form unexpected or undesired by the primary agents of progressive international institutions.
Since its release in 1966, Gillo Pontecorvo's The Battle of Algiers has divided critical opinion. The film which depicts the Algerian struggle for independence, was awarded the Lion d'Or at the 1966 Venice Film Festival and nominated a year later for an Oscar as Best Foreign Film. Despite this acclaim, the inherently controversial film was banned in France until 1971 due to its graphic portrayal of torture and repression during the war. Heavily influenced by the distinctive film style Neorealism, the politically engaged director sought to make a film which was produced and shot within a 'dictatorship of truth.' These neorealist aesthetics (hand-held camera, non professional actors) rendered such an extraordinarily accurate reflection of social reality that the film's original U.S. distributor inserted the disclaimer: "Not one foot of newsreel or documentary film has been used."
Fanon stated that in order to achieve liberation we need violence. He clearly says, “But it (decolonization) cannot be accomplished by the wave of a magic wand, a natural cataclysm, or a gentleman’s agreement”(3) It was and is a vital part against colonialism and imperialism. Because not only do the colonized have to fight for liberty they have to dominate those once colonized centers. When they fight for liberty the natives become united. That is his first strategy in order to obtain decolonization.
Since its release in 1966, Gillo Pontecorvo's The Battle of Algiers has divided critical opinion. The film which depicts the Algerian struggle for independence against French colonial power, was awarded the Lion d'Or at the 1966 Venice Film Festival. Yet, despite this acclaim, the inherently controversial film was banned in France until 1971 due to its graphic portrayal of torture and repression during the Algerian war. The politically engaged director had however sought to make The Battle of Algiers within a 'dictatorship of truth,' neither supporting the Algerians nor reducing his film to propaganda. Influenced by the distinctive film style Neorealism, Pontecorvo rendered such an extraordinarily accurate reflection of social reality that the film's original U.S. distributor inserted the disclaimer: "Not one foot of newsreel or documentary film has been used." The following sequence analysis will therefore explore the neorealist cinematic techniques employed by Pontecorvo and examine their effects on our understanding of the issues and themes raised within the film.
Lumumba: Race and Revolution In the French film entitled Lumumba, director Raoul Peck recreates the revolutionary struggle of Patrice Lumumba, the newly elected Prime Minister of The Congolese Republic. In the movie, we do not see much of the independence struggle against the Belgian government, but we begin to see the reconstruction of the African state in African hands. While no one ever claimed that decolonization was easy, maybe this particular example can best be explained by Fanon’s simplified little quip “decolonization is always a violent phenomenon. ” In this paper, I will seek to locate where this post-colonial violence is located in discourses regarding race, class and gender.
The film was created with the help of the Front de Libération Nationale, the nationalist group behind the Algerian revolution, and tells the story of independence from the non-French Algerian viewpoint. Scenes in the film use the capital of Algiers as a backdrop for the drastic fighting and bombings of the war. The contrast of settings used in scenes portrays the nice and well kept portions of the city and the inner chaos and poor living conditions of the areas in which the non-French Algerians had been restricted to. The scenes exemplify Manichaeism with the clear separation of the two areas and the quality of living of the people residing in each
The 1950s was not a particularly good decade for France. The Fourth Republic, which had been established in the aftermath of the Second World War, remained unstable and lurched from crisis to crisis. Between 1946 and 1954, there had been a war in French Indo-China, between a nationalist force under Ho Chi Minh and the French. The war was long and bitter and towards the end, the French suffered the ignominy of losing the major fortress of Dien Bien Phu to the guerrillas on 7 May 1954. An armistice was sought with Ho Chi Minh, and the nations of North and South Vietnam emerged from the ashes of the colony. It is entirely likely that the success of the guerrillas influenced the Algerian insurrectionists, the National Liberation Front(FLN), in tactics and in the idea that the time was ripe to strike. It is clear that the FLN employed similar methods to those developed by the nationalists under Ho Chi Minh.1
The man does so while shedding a tear and half-heartedly trying to escape; clearly being forced to do something against his will. Within the first seconds of the movie depicts a subtle, yet powerful, connection between violence and power. Col. Mathieu is using his perceived power, through punishment, over the Arabic man to find out where rebel Ali La Pointe and others are hiding- and has the viewers see, it works. Throughout the movie only one dimension of power is exerted- dominance, and while the Battle of Algiers was won by the National Liberation Front, the overall war was lost, giving Algiers independence. I would argue this is because while violence can create immediate power, it will never maintain power over a group of
Wretched of the Earth by Frantz Fanon explores the roles of violence, class, and political organization in the process of decolonization. Within a Marxist framework, Fanon theorizes and prophesizes the successes and failures of independence movements within colonized nations. He exalts the proletariat as a revolutionary class that is first to realize the necessity of violence in the removal of colonial regimes. Yet the accomplishment and disappointments of the proletariat are at the hand of men. Fanon neglects women in terms of the proletariat’s wishes and efforts. In spite of this exclusion, Fanon nonetheless develops a theory that could apply to the proletariat as a whole, women included. For although Fanon failed to acknowledge women’s role in a post-colonial society, his theory of the revolutionary proletariat applies to Egypt’s lower class women.
One of West Africa largest empires is the Empire of Mali that was founded by Sundiata Keita. The empire is located in Sahel,which was on the border of Sahara Desert. The Empire of Mali became rich by controlling the Saharan trade. The Mali consisted of oral traditions that distributed great power and wealth. Mali empire was known for unity and prosperity. The empire of Mali affected West Africa by economy, culture, and architecture.
Women played a major role in the Battle for Algiers, during the war for independence. During that time of cultural crisis, limitations and prejudices were disregarded in the unity created by their great need. While not all women supported independence, most did, joining the National Liberation Front (NLF). Using their femininity as a shield and a mask, women were able to infiltrate enemy lines and make major inroads for their liberty (White, 2013). By some women’s role in this decisive effort has been marginalized, but historians are keeping awareness about it fresh.
The process of decolonization in Africa during the 1950’s through the 1970’s was a very smart yet risky idea. For some places independence was easily gained yet in other areas it was a battle. During the time periods where colonization existed, Africa was peaceful and kept things in order. People had control over their specific locations and there were no questions to be asked. Once it was decided to remove these rights, things got out of hand rather quickly. Violence was a main occurrence during the decolonization timeframe because rules, rights, leaderships, etc. got altered and drastically changed. Sometimes nonviolence was used but it usually wasn’t as effective. A major example of using nonviolence actions to gain independence is when Gandhi protested in India. African leaders have tried very hard to lessen the influence of Western powers and the broader international community but they’ve never been completely successful because they continuously needed support in state building, economic development, and public health initiatives.
The award-winning 1966 film, The Battle of Algiers depicts the struggle between natives (the Algerians) and the colonizer (France) during a revolutionary fight for independence. After viewing this film, it is evident that the reasons for revolution and extreme violence on the part of the Algerians were fueled by the thoughts and ideology of Frantz Fanon, a notorious Algerian psychiatrist who promoted and accepted terrorist violence as a valid means of achieving group goals. Although the extreme violence in this film may be seen as aggressive and unnecessary by some, it is evident that the National Liberation Front (FLN) and its supporters believed that terrorism was their last chance for independence from France after 130 years of colonization