Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of the Battle of Algiers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of the Battle of Algiers
Gillo Pontecorvo’s masterful film The Battle of Algiers artfully depicts the violent Algerian uprising from 1954-1962 against French colonial rule in the city of Algiers. Pontecorvo’s film is one of the most historically accurate representations about decolonization in the 20th century. When the film was first released, it was banned in France due to its controversial subject and realistic depiction of the violent methods both used during the Algerian uprising. Pontecorvo is brutally honest in his depiction of the atrocities that the FLN and French authorities committed during the battle. The Battle of Algiers is a stunning example of how the transition to decolonization does not occur peacefully. Whilst the FLN initiated the Algerian uprising in the 1950s, the Mau Mau were also fighting for independence in Kenya. The FLN and the Mau Mau employ the same ideology of nationalism as a justification for their violent actions. The FLN and the Mau Mau both show little regard for European life and attack public places without remorse. In the mid-20th century, the ideology of decolonization and independence grew rapidly among the colonized. A vast majority of rebellions were based upon nationalist ideologies and grew out of a need for violence. During these …show more content…
French Martinique philosopher and revolutionary Frantz Fanon states in his book, The Wretched of the Earth, that decolonization is inherently fraught with violence and cannot occur peacefully. Fanon’s ideology that violence is a necessity for decolonization is evident in The Battle of Algiers where the FLN’s attacks on European and Muslim civilians and the French authorities use of torture to extract information resulted in a brutal conflict that lasted for nearly eight years and claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of
Algeria had revolted against the French colonies many times, but did not succeed with overthrowing them. Under the French rule
Since its release in 1966, Gillo Pontecorvo's The Battle of Algiers has divided critical opinion. The film which depicts the Algerian struggle for independence, was awarded the Lion d'Or at the 1966 Venice Film Festival and nominated a year later for an Oscar as Best Foreign Film. Despite this acclaim, the inherently controversial film was banned in France until 1971 due to its graphic portrayal of torture and repression during the war. Heavily influenced by the distinctive film style Neorealism, the politically engaged director sought to make a film which was produced and shot within a 'dictatorship of truth.' These neorealist aesthetics (hand-held camera, non professional actors) rendered such an extraordinarily accurate reflection of social reality that the film's original U.S. distributor inserted the disclaimer: "Not one foot of newsreel or documentary film has been used."
Casablanca’s setting exposes the hometown view points so the audience sympathize with Casablanca’s inhabitants. Casablanca’s majority wants to leave but must stay while under the German rule. Although Casablanca still claimed they were unoccupied France, it became obvious that they i...
Since its release in 1966, Gillo Pontecorvo's The Battle of Algiers has divided critical opinion. The film which depicts the Algerian struggle for independence against French colonial power, was awarded the Lion d'Or at the 1966 Venice Film Festival. Yet, despite this acclaim, the inherently controversial film was banned in France until 1971 due to its graphic portrayal of torture and repression during the Algerian war. The politically engaged director had however sought to make The Battle of Algiers within a 'dictatorship of truth,' neither supporting the Algerians nor reducing his film to propaganda. Influenced by the distinctive film style Neorealism, Pontecorvo rendered such an extraordinarily accurate reflection of social reality that the film's original U.S. distributor inserted the disclaimer: "Not one foot of newsreel or documentary film has been used." The following sequence analysis will therefore explore the neorealist cinematic techniques employed by Pontecorvo and examine their effects on our understanding of the issues and themes raised within the film.
The representation of violence and ethnic oppression in Pontecorvo’s The Battle of Algiers and Kassovitz’s La Haine (Hate) is shown through multiple scenes and themes throughout both films. Though set forty years apart, the violence of French police and ethnic oppression faced by non-French peoples are strikingly similar. One recurring theme falls under Manichaeism as defined by Frantz Fanon in his work The Wretched of the Earth. Fanon describes the term as a division between upper-class and lower-class populated areas. The division becomes apparent not naturally, but through the enforcement of the French police. There still exists a debate on the way the French government handles non-French peoples and whether it is too similar to the actions
The 1950s was not a particularly good decade for France. The Fourth Republic, which had been established in the aftermath of the Second World War, remained unstable and lurched from crisis to crisis. Between 1946 and 1954, there had been a war in French Indo-China, between a nationalist force under Ho Chi Minh and the French. The war was long and bitter and towards the end, the French suffered the ignominy of losing the major fortress of Dien Bien Phu to the guerrillas on 7 May 1954. An armistice was sought with Ho Chi Minh, and the nations of North and South Vietnam emerged from the ashes of the colony. It is entirely likely that the success of the guerrillas influenced the Algerian insurrectionists, the National Liberation Front(FLN), in tactics and in the idea that the time was ripe to strike. It is clear that the FLN employed similar methods to those developed by the nationalists under Ho Chi Minh.1
The man does so while shedding a tear and half-heartedly trying to escape; clearly being forced to do something against his will. Within the first seconds of the movie depicts a subtle, yet powerful, connection between violence and power. Col. Mathieu is using his perceived power, through punishment, over the Arabic man to find out where rebel Ali La Pointe and others are hiding- and has the viewers see, it works. Throughout the movie only one dimension of power is exerted- dominance, and while the Battle of Algiers was won by the National Liberation Front, the overall war was lost, giving Algiers independence. I would argue this is because while violence can create immediate power, it will never maintain power over a group of
It is 1957 and the Algerian war is at its prime as the FLN fight against an elite troop of ruthless French paratroopers. The Battle of Algiers is a portion of the Algerian war which was fought in order for Algeria to gain independence from France. The film starts off with the torturing of an old man to gain information on where the last of the freedom fighters, Ali Pointe is hiding. A large segment of the film is shot in flashbacks focusing on the past of Ali Pointe. Pointe was a ruffian with theft and drugs on his record; he joined the militants to assist in getting rid of the problems in Algeria associated with the French. With the flashbacks the film tells the struggles of the insurgents and the persistence of the French to end the war. It shows the transformation of the insurgency into a full out revolution. When the flashbacks ends and it is now present time Ali Pointe, along with the rest of the FLN leaders captured are beheaded. Through this, the FLN reciprocate and the insurgency becomes a full on national revolution with growth in numbers and support. The film ends with Algeria gaining the independence it strived for in 1962. The film is important in understanding asymmetric conflicts because despite being the weaker side, Algeria had proved itself to be much stronger than the French and had its newfound independence to show for it.
One of West Africa largest empires is the Empire of Mali that was founded by Sundiata Keita. The empire is located in Sahel,which was on the border of Sahara Desert. The Empire of Mali became rich by controlling the Saharan trade. The Mali consisted of oral traditions that distributed great power and wealth. Mali empire was known for unity and prosperity. The empire of Mali affected West Africa by economy, culture, and architecture.
Insurgencies are no strangers to history, and have incessantly proven to be turning points for those populations who are oppressed or subjugated, typically into a chance for positive change. However, history books tend to overlook Africa’s remarkable political growth in the modern era, even though their population has endured centuries of oppression and have rebelled similarly to that of the Soviet Union insurgencies in the twentieth century. A strong example of African political strife would be between the Mau-Mau and the British in Kenya. The Mau-Mau Uprising was a civil war fought in Kenya, which began on October 21st, 1952, and ended on January 12th, 1960. The rebellion had been fought by the African rebellion groups, the Mau-Mau, against the British government in an attempt to regain Kenyan land which had been procured from the original owners and permeated by white colonists. Their road to improvement had become blocked by colonialism, and the Mau-Mau chose to express their displeasure through violence and upheaval. Following the realization that they had become subjugated in their homeland, the Mau-Mau Uprising is a chief instance of African peoples opting to wage war for their freedom. It is an event which revealed how politically conscious Kenyans were at the time, and how they fought to create their own future apart from the colonialist world of which they were slowly becoming prisoners.
Fanon stated that in order to achieve liberation we need violence. He clearly says, “But it (decolonization) cannot be accomplished by the wave of a magic wand, a natural cataclysm, or a gentleman’s agreement”(3) It was and is a vital part against colonialism and imperialism. Because not only do the colonized have to fight for liberty they have to dominate those once colonized centers. When they fight for liberty the natives become united. That is his first strategy in order to obtain decolonization.
Wretched of the Earth by Frantz Fanon explores the roles of violence, class, and political organization in the process of decolonization. Within a Marxist framework, Fanon theorizes and prophesizes the successes and failures of independence movements within colonized nations. He exalts the proletariat as a revolutionary class that is first to realize the necessity of violence in the removal of colonial regimes. Yet the accomplishment and disappointments of the proletariat are at the hand of men. Fanon neglects women in terms of the proletariat’s wishes and efforts. In spite of this exclusion, Fanon nonetheless develops a theory that could apply to the proletariat as a whole, women included. For although Fanon failed to acknowledge women’s role in a post-colonial society, his theory of the revolutionary proletariat applies to Egypt’s lower class women.
“The Stranger”, a novel by French novelist Albert Camus, depicts the life in French-ruled Algeria in 1940s. “The Stranger” begins with Meursault’s mother’s funeral. After funeral, Meursault cruelly killed an Arabic man and he is sentenced to death because he does not show his sorrow at his mother’s funeral rather than murder. “The Stranger” is always manifested as a classic of “Absurdism”, discussed by readers and writers. However, associating with the time that Albert wrote this novel and the history of that time, people cannot overlook the ideas about colonialism in “The Stranger”. Meursault’s indifferent characteristic, ridiculous crime, and obscure description about places are epitome of French colonists’ brutal oppressions and sarcasm to French governor’s inconsistent behavior. Albert Camus uses these elements to condemn French colonists and colonism.
The award-winning 1966 film, The Battle of Algiers depicts the struggle between natives (the Algerians) and the colonizer (France) during a revolutionary fight for independence. After viewing this film, it is evident that the reasons for revolution and extreme violence on the part of the Algerians were fueled by the thoughts and ideology of Frantz Fanon, a notorious Algerian psychiatrist who promoted and accepted terrorist violence as a valid means of achieving group goals. Although the extreme violence in this film may be seen as aggressive and unnecessary by some, it is evident that the National Liberation Front (FLN) and its supporters believed that terrorism was their last chance for independence from France after 130 years of colonization
Women played a major role in the Battle for Algiers, during the war for independence. During that time of cultural crisis, limitations and prejudices were disregarded in the unity created by their great need. While not all women supported independence, most did, joining the National Liberation Front (NLF). Using their femininity as a shield and a mask, women were able to infiltrate enemy lines and make major inroads for their liberty (White, 2013). By some women’s role in this decisive effort has been marginalized, but historians are keeping awareness about it fresh.