Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Orientalism introduction said summary
Features of Post colonial literature
Features of Post colonial literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Orientalism introduction said summary
It is the same case between the old magistrate and the blind barbarian girl. The magistrate is curious about how she got injured by the police. But the girl did not answer this question directly. By either saying “I’ am tired of taking ”(Coeteez, 44) or simply “shrugs and keep silent” (Coeteez, 31). The problem in their communication is caused by asymmetry of discourse, but not the language barrier. They can communicate properly in other situations, but only when she is asked to describe how the soldiers treated her, she refused to speak. In this case, the magistrate the represent of the colonizers of the Empire, deprived the barbarian girl of discourse to build up his colonial discourse, forming a strong contrasting relationship between the …show more content…
Said claimed in his Orientalism, the Westerners create a East that project the idea of savagery, barbarity to make themselves enlightened, to make themselves necessary. In this way, they find a reasonable excuse to exist. To reveal the true face to the colonizers, Coeteez depicted the brutal torture. The uncle and nephew who came for medical care were imprisoned for no reason. The uncle died mysteriously and was convicted “attacking the police” as an excuse for the soldiers to exculpate themselves. While the nephew was tortured by a knife and suffered greatly so that he had no alternaltives but to admit that their tribe is planning war. The same case goes with the barbarian girl and her father, and later even the magistrate himself. In contrast, the barbarians did nothing, they never appeared, even after the Empire army lost and were about to leave. This contrast also lead to the deconstruct of the colonial discourse. And meanwhile, Coeteez bitterly rebuke the duality of the relationship between the barbarian and civilization. “Civilization is the extremist, most brutal cruel barbarian. Barbarian is the original, natural, essential …show more content…
The two character, the young and the old, the poor and the rich, the prisoner and the official, the civilized and the barbaric, the narrator and the silent one, successfully, perfectly achieve the goal of the overturn of the colonial discourse. The magistrate is the strong, powerful part in terms of discourse. Comparatively, he is old and weak, with less physical power, while the barbarian girl is young and lively. During their journey back to the barbarian girl’s tribe, the magistrate along with others got very sick after drinking the water. However the barbarian girl was the only one to stay healthy. The difference in life force suggests an overturn regarding discourse. More importantly, it was the barbarian girl who gradually made the magistrate’s reconsider justice and morality during their staying together. She is the silent, wordless character, but her silence turned a powerful, superior Empire official to change his view on the question “Who is barbaric and who is civilized?”. And finally made him to change his position from serving the Empire, wishing for peace, to a strong force of overturning the colonial
Ulrich had a well explanation for her slogan on "well-behaved women." She supports her slogan by bringing up certain women stereotypes that have been going on throughout history. She uses these stereotypes to explain how certain people view on women.
Warring tribes could put aside differences to help a member of the opposing tribe out. To put aside animosity and give generously to an enemy is no easy feat. This means that inter-tribe relations can display empathy and furthermore, kindness. However, de Vaca also recalls negativity during inter-tribe relations, “All these tribes are warlike, and have as much strategy for protection against enemies as if they had been reared in Italy in continual feuds” (95). This is interesting as de Vaca is drawing a comparison between the Indians and Europeans.
In Night, he informs his reader of many examples on how a myriad of good people turn into brutes. They see horrific actions, therefore, they cannot help by becoming a brute. They experience their innocent family members being burned alive, innocent people dieing from starvation due to a minuscule proportion of food, and innocent people going to take a shower and not coming out because truly, it is a gas chamber and all f...
... of language and education is the most important in this story and society. The make use of two different languages in a narrative, provides a reader a perplexing yet fascinating image of characterization and customs. Multilingual story telling pushes the reader to decelerate and acquire supplemental focus on the expressions which are in the small fragments, however as soon as the reader has figured out the foreign words, he or she acquires a priceless picture of the theme of this story. The panorama of native words and phrases, cultural perceptions, and class dispute taken from the incorporation of two different languages are helpful for the reader to obtain significance that he or she couldn't gain if exclusively one language was employed in the story. Just as the power of language is applied to unveil a society, a better comprehension is provided to the reader.
Mutilating the whites and leaving their bodies lying is inhumane. It is such a shocking story! This book was meant to teach the reader about the inhumanity of slavery. It also gives us the image of what happened during the past years when slavery was practised. The book is significant in the sense that it gives even the current generation the knowledge of slavery, how it happened and the reason for slavery.
...“A war-maker” “A ruler” From this the reader learns that there has been a distinct split between men and women since the beginning of time. It is interesting that Alette is hearing this information from a headless woman. (Notley 91) The woman being headless symbolizes women being praised for their bodies, sexuality, or feminity not for their brains or education. The headless woman says, “my body” “still danced then-” “but my head” “played audience” “to the achievements” “of males” (Notley 91)
Webster's online dictionary defines civilization as "a society in an advanced state of social development". Without the restraints of society, the behaviour of people will regress to their savage beginnings, due to the fact that one's need for survival will overpower all other impulses. The descent into savagery, man's inherent desire to survive over anything else, and the need for civilization and order shows how society unnaturally holds everyone together. Society artificially bonds everything together by imposing rules and structures and without the reminders of civilization and its conventions the savagery of human nature emerges.
The essay “How to Tame a Wild Tongue” by Gloria Anzaldua is relevant to today’s society, because it brings to discussion important social issues such acculturation, racism, and sexism. A major social event that she lived through and was an advocate of was the Chicano movement, which influenced her in her writing. This essay is not only written solely using her intelligence and research, it also comes from personal experience. Furthermore, she says that she will not be silenced anymore, that all people deserve the right to freedom of speech and the freedom to their culture. Not to have to submit to the dominant cultures found here in the United States. This essay is directed towards two groups
When creating a comparative rhetorical analysis of two different feminist essays, we must first define the term “feminism”. According to Merriam-Webster.com, feminism is “the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities”. Feminism is a also a long term social movement, one that’s been in the works since the early 1900’s. However, as any challenger to the norm might receive, the words ‘feminism’ and ‘feminist’ have gotten a bad reputation. Throughout the years, popular opinion has agreed that if you’re a feminist, you hate men, and don’t shave. It’s a very close-minded belief, and both Lindy West and Roxane Gay agree. Both authors of the essays I am comparing today, West and Gay try and convey their beliefs that feminism isn’t what you think it is. However, they do it in very different ways. Who conveyed their beliefs of feminism better and the superior argument? That is what I am going to display today.
...aracter in the novel has, the novel ends with him “feeling stupid.” (Coetzee, 156) The girl is gone and the conflict between the empire and the barbarians rages on; the magistrate still does not have all the answers for the world that is crumbling around him. Still, he will presumably continue to search, as Coetzee largely leaves the novel open-ended. For the magistrate however, it is not his destination that is important, but his journey. During his journey he learns a lot about the nature of humanity, and about the nature of the conflict between empire and subject. Ultimately peace will not be achieved between the empire and the barbarians until each side fully recognizes the humanity of the other side, the same way the magistrate came to recognize the humanity of the girl.
Rhythm is the fundamental element of music; without its pulsing drive, a melody seems aimless, and harmony irrelevant. The beat of a drum awakens the primal within us, calling back ancestral memories and basic instincts. It can lead us to dance and to joy, but also, too often, to war. The war drums beat loudly in cycles throughout history. Many would argue they first became audible to our generation immediately following September 11 th, 2001, and grew deafening with the buildup to our invasion of Iraq. Few would deny that with America's massive global economic and military influence, we have become an empire. Many would argue that we have been an imperial power for some time now. Even so, it is only recently that that recognition has entered the popular consciousness, and so only recently could we begin interpreting artistic analyses and criticisms of imperialism as they relate to our own nation. J.M. Coetzee?s Waiting for the Barbarians paints a disturbing picture of what it means to be a citizen and a proponent of empire, one as applicable to modern America as it was to apartheid South Africa at the time it was written. Coetzee has created a story of Justice versus Empire that applies to us all not just as imperial citizens, but as human beings as well.
Furthermore, understanding the fact of how the villagers in that village practiced and participated in such a barbaric ritual and archaic event were not accepted by people. In addition, people who read the story commented that the modest people of the Midwest are superstitious and backward. Here, Jackson conveyed successfully with her subtle writing style that something is about to happen. She also used a third person point of view when writing this short story. The third person point of view permitted the author to keep the outcome of the story an exposure. This therefore led to the reader to consider everything is well but actually there is something wrong somewhere. Furthermore, what could be seen from the story is people were different compared to present, there is a huge difference in cultural practices. Therefore the actions of the story go in the opposite direction of people’s opinion in the present in terms of value of life, violence and the development of respect in a family.
However, when he becomes involved with a barbarian girl, their perception of him changes and he is viewed as a traitor and an outsider. The Magistrate’s identity is formed on the basis of his position in relation to his community, so when their view of him changes, so does he. It leads to a conflict between his loyalty to the empire and his own goals, leading to fragmentation and a lack of cultural belonging. Near the end of the novel, the Magistrate says: “This is not the scene I dreamed of. Like much else nowadays I leave it feeling stupid, like a man who lost his way long ago but presses on along a road that may lead nowhere” (Coetzee 156). The Magistrate’s desire to retain the approval of his countrymen comes into conflict with his desire to protect the barbarian girl, creating inner turmoil and reshaping his identity. The moral dissent caused by the Magistrate’s peers influence him greatly, masking his true sense of self. However in the end, the Magistrate’s true identity wins out against the sway of the others, as expressed by his sense of liberal guilt. This shows that one’s identity can be greatly influenced by others perception of us, but ultimately, one’s actual identity will steer an individual towards the road they are meant to
The contrast between the characters of the Magistrate who is the protagonist in the novel, Waiting for the Barbarians, and Colonel Joll who is the antagonist is a perfect example of an antithesis based on their personality and moral outlook. The conflicting attributes of the characters form the basic elements of the antithesis. Throughout the novel, the Magistrate is portrayed as a truth-seeking person whereas Colonel Joll is described as a perpetrator of violence and injustice. In the sentence, “I was the lie that Empire tells itself when times are easy, he the truth that Empire tells when harsh winds blow.” J.M Coetzee tries to introduce an antithesis to the readers by contrasting the roles of the two characters. This sentence also indicates the Empire’s hypocrisy and duplicity. In the passage, the Magistrate comes to a conclusion that he is actually similar to Colonel Joll in a way that they both are part of the Empire’s machinery. The Magistrate’s character is simply a mask that hides the ugly face of the Empire, which is represented by Colonel Joll’s image. Concisely, the Magistrate and Colonel Joll are the two sides of the same coin, as the Magistrate puts it, “Two sides of imperial rule, no more, no less.” The contrast between ‘lie’ and ‘truth’ in the second sentence of the passage is very significant because it is the fundamental element of the antithesis introduced by Coetzee. The sentence implies that the role of the Magistrate in the Empire is merely superficial and the image of Colonel Joll is the reality. In the same sentence, Coetzee uses the phrases “when times are easy” to describe a ‘peaceful time’, and “when harsh winds blow” to depict a ‘trying period’. This choice of words is effective because it gives an activ...
A common post-colonial struggle shows itself in Soyinka’s The Lion and the Jewel between modernity and the traditional, seen both in a transparent manner as the Western World clearly and gradually influences the play’s village of Ilujinle as well as a deeper way between two of its central characters—Lakunle representing modernity while Baroka represents tradition. However, although the struggle is brought to fruition throughout the course of the play, it seems rather evident for which side Soyinka himself is more of a prominent advocate, obvious by the way he portrays both Lakunle and Baroka, and how they conclude their roles in the play. Lakunle’s follies in the play become his undoing, whereas Baroka’s strength and titular power as the Bale of the village wins Sidi’s hand in marriage, ultimately proving tradition to be the ultimate survivor in this battle royale. However, Soyinka seems to blur the lines a bit more by including the rape of Sidi by Baroka.