Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women portrayal in movies
Sexism in movies essays
Stereotypes of women in cinema
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Women portrayal in movies
Although in the surface the film seems to be permitting feminism by showing Tess McGill’s success through hard work, when looking deeper we see that the movie also undercuts and weakens its massage about feminism. One great example would be the way Tess McGill’s character is sexualized. For instance, lets look at the scene where Jack Trainer and Tess first cross Path. When Jack spots her at the bar dressed in pretty black dress unlike the other business women at the place, he tells her, “You’re the only woman I’ve seen at one of these things who dresses like a woman, not like a woman thinks a man would dress if he was a woman.” To which Tess replies to by stating, “I have a head for business and a bod for sin.” When looking at this scene in
Rosario was very sad because she knew that Carlitos was suffering very much. There is a scene where Carlitos is talking to his mom and Rosario ask: “what do you need Carlitos?” and he answer “I need you.” This scene clearly shows up the child’s pain of being separated from his mother. But also the pain of the mother because she is not with his child. (Riggen)
Discriminating gender roles throughout the movie leaves one to believe if they are supposed to act a certain way. This film gives women and men roles that don’t exist anymore, during the 60s women were known to care for the family and take care of the house, basically working at home. However, a male was supposed to fight for his family, doing all the hard work so his wife didn’t have too. In today’s world, everyone does what makes them happy. You can’t tell a woman to stay at home, that makes them feel useless. Furthermore, males still play the roles of hard workers, they are powerful compared to a woman. However, in today’s world a male knows it isn’t right to boss a woman around, where in the 60s, it happened, today women have rights to do what they want not what they are
Women were represented in different ways throughout the movie Metropolis, but the underlying theme was women were seen as purely sexual. Maria was seen as the nurturer in the film, but also as a sexual object. She was the one who preached for peace and harmony down in the catacombs to the workers. Maria was also the nurturing maternal figure that was seen walking into the garden with all of the poor children. The vamp, on the other hand, was portrayed blatantly as a sexual object. This whole movie was seen through the eyes of the male perspective, which usually portrays women as sexual objects, and robs them of any identity. Lang shows Frederson as having fear of femininity which involves women's emotion and nurturing.
In this case women are stuck where in no matter how they act or how they dress, they end up put into a label they do not necessarily belong in. The main goal of feminism is to create equality for women and fight against the labels put on them. Though throughout time feminism itself has been given a negative label. In today 's society women do not want to be referred to as feminists from fear of being labeled as a bitter man hating woman. This is definitely amplified in media today. Roxane Gay, author of Bad Feminist, brings up the idea of the essential feminist and where it suggests,” anger, humorlessness, militancy, unwavering principles, and a prescribed set of rules for how to be a proper feminist woman” (169). This fear of being labeled a feminist not only comes from fear of being thought of as angry or humorless, but from being attacked for not being the “proper feminist woman”.
To understand feminism in the novel, one must first understand the feminist lens itself. OWL Purdue describes the lens as “the ways in which literature (and other cultural productions) reinforce or undermine the economic, political, social, and psychological oppression of women” (Purdue). Feminism acts as both a commitment and a political movement that wants to end sexism in all forms. Most feminists generally disagree on many topics of the subject, however all have one common goal. These aspects affect The Things They Carry in a plethora of ways, mostly due to the fact that gender roles is a main theme. There are negative and positive aspects of the feminist lens. Positive contains the empowering of women and equality, whereas negative pertains to oppression and unequal rights. Both are covered in The Things They Carried from sex symbols to battle tor...
The clear path to success for her is to discard her aspects of femininity and focus on making the grade. She does this, and is chosen for the prestigious internship held by her law professor. He later sexually assaults her and tells her that he only hired her because he thought she was attractive. She tries to leave law school, finding this to be the final straw, and only stays with the support of her friends. Emmett, a recent graduate who supports her law school endeavors and encourages her to study and fit in, falls in love with her, and tries to get her to stay for him. When looked at directly, none of this seems particularly feminist, and at first glance, it isn’t. But at second glance, it can be seen that everyone who makes active choices are women. The women in this play support each other instead of tearing each other down, and aspects of knowledge that are considered feminine, (and therefore weaker), are explicitly utilized to solve problems that the straight and narrow law school path
By dissecting the film, the director, Jennie Livingston's methodology and the audience's perceived response I believe we can easily ignore a different and more positive way of understanding the film despite the many flaws easy for feminist minds to criticize. This is in no way saying that these critiques are not valid, or that it is not beneficial to look at works of any form through the many and various feminist lenses.
Women who lived in this time period were expected to be pure, chaste, and innocent. When Tess is stripped of all of these attributes she fights to restore what was brazenly taken from her. Regardless of the amount of times she reinvents herself, society, social stigmas and her dark past prevent her from freeing herself of her burdens. However, when Tess realizes that she has the chance to change her fate, she actively changes herself into a strong, resilient woman – which ultimately leads to her demise.
Hooks begins by stating that Feminism in the United States did not emerge as a result of victimized, underprivileged women who faced sexist oppression so much so they have internalized it , but in fact by bourgeois upper-class white women whose idea's of equality were far different. She begins this criticism with Betty Friedan, a leading figure in the women's movement and the author of the classic The Feminine Mystique claiming that the book ignored the difficulty and even the existence of non-white, poor women with the assumption that her concerns were harmonious wi...
Shaw explained, “These aspects involve the chaste, domestic, caring mother or Madonna and the sexy, seducing, fun-loving playmate or whore,” in the book in terms of showing what the two types of women there are considered to be in society (Shaw 117). Society and men only see one or the other spectrum when it comes to the type of women they want to be associated with based on that woman’s femininity. These complete opposite side of the spectrum, “…cause tension as women navigate the implications of these aspects of femininity in their everyday lives.” (Shaw 117). Women are put inside an invisible box that conforms them to what society considers being feminine. If you do not act, look, speak, walk, talk, or even breathe femininely the way society thinks you should, then you’re considered not a “normal” woman. Have you ever heard a relative, a friend, or an acquaintance say, “that’s not how a lady should act,” and I always sit back, after hearing an individual say that and ask myself, how is a lady “suppose” to
Jules Ostin is a self proclaimed feminist, but she contradicts the ideals in almost every sense. Linda A. Jackson, Ruth E. Fleury and Donna A. Lewandowski state that feminism is a broad definition that includes issues of equality. (quoted in Bohan, Denmark & Paludi, Donovan, Hyde, Maracek 688) Feminism focuses on the quality and fair treatment of all. More often than not it supports women, because women have and still are treated unfairly, but it is not a term that is solely for women. This is the common misconception ‘The Intern’ makes. The best example is in the bar scene where Jules degrades her fellow male co workers, and compares them to Ben, saying that they should try to be more like him and that they are practically chauvinistic men. So is it all of a sudden okay to attack men for the way they behave, and compare them to other men? This goes against the core fundamentals of feminism, which I can not stress enough; is the equality and fair treatment and respect of all people, male or
...ereotypes and patriarchal norms (Annie baking, Helen being a rich step-mom, the wedding itself), it also undermines patriarchy at the same time. At one point or another throughout the film all of the female characters go against the common conception and portrayal of women being proper and passive. They can be raunchy, drink, use vulgar language, and show they aren’t that different from men.
Carl Franklin’s “House of cards” Writers really try, they do, they include many female lead roles with ambitions and depths to their character that on the surface would make even the most extreme tumblr feminist jump for joy. But when you look a little closer you realise that they are merely tools for men to wield the achieve there goals or need to be saved by a Deus Ex Dong to achieve anything. The definition of feminism is idea that both men and women should have equal rights, but in the House of Cards women often are never equal to men and are never as smart or and cunning; which in the world of politics seems to be one of the most important things, along with being an old white man. Carl Franklin’s “House of cards” is a great example
Rooney brings this point up, but much to her credit, does not unleash an attack on Hardy or men because of it. Often feminist critics bear the burden that they are out to “get” men, yet when there is an apt argument for doing so in Tess, Rooney refrains and simply addresses the issues. Overall, her article was quite helpful in addressing the most resonate conflict in the whole story.
Feminist Criticism is suppressed in literature and film. In this case, one can use Feminist Criticism on the film The Titanic. Rose can be viewed as feminist. She is not a traditional woman of that time as she doesn’t care about what is appropriate behavior for men and what is appropriate behavior for women. Throughout the film, Rose shows how she doesn’t care about femininity and what the standard for women was back in 1912. Rose disregards what is for men and what is for women. There are a couple of examples within the film scenes that show how feminist criticism would say is not normal for women. The first example is the scene where Rose goes with Jack to see how he lives his life with the lower class population. He takes her to a party attended by the third class passengers. Rose grabs a beer and Jack looks at her oddly as this is not viewed as proper etiquette for a woman of Rose’s class. Rose’s response was: “What a first class girl can’t drink beer” (Titanic). This quote shows how the view on a first class lady is that they should be more classy and that beer is more appropriate for men that are lower class. Another example, is when Rose tells Jack, “to teach her to ride like a man, chew like a man, and spit like a man” (Titanic). Rose uses the phrase “like a man” showing that she is interested in doing things that are only viewed as male characteristics or