Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Causes of aeroplane accidents
Ideal performance management system
Effective Performance Management System
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Causes of aeroplane accidents
Based on the statistic above, for primary cause factors of accidents that happen in worldwide commercial jet fleet, we can see that 80% of the accidents happened was ‘human caused’. The statistic above is not simply created, but it was concluded after years of research by hundreds of investigator. It is also the same as the factors that will be listed as the prime factors that caused a catastrophic disaster at Tenerife airport. 60 investigators were sent down to Tenerife airport to investigate the cause of the accidents. All the possible factors that found to be the cause for the disaster were list down, being research and investigate, and also some investigators do study group to exchanges the information and opinions for the accident. After many years of investigation, they had solved and concluded the case as stated in their reports that being referred to complete this assignment. 1. COMMUNICATION MISUNDERSTANDINGS Immediately after lining up, the KLM captain, the most senior pilot working for KLM, advanced the throttles (a standard procedure known as "spool-up", to verify that the engines are operating properly for takeoff) and the co-pilot, surprised by the maneuver, quickly advised the captain that ATC clearance had not yet been given. Captain Van Zanten responded, "I know that. Go ahead, ask." KLM First Officer Meurs then radioed the tower that they were "ready for takeoff" and "waiting for our ATC clearance". The KLM crew then received instructions which specified the route that the aircraft was to follow after takeoff. The instructions used the word "take-off," but did not include an explicit statement that they were cleared for take-off. First Officer Meurs read the flight clearance back to the controller, com... ... middle of paper ... ...used an accident. Based on the Tenerife airport disaster, there is one major factor that caused the aircraft collision, which is human error. The accident obviously occurred because the captain of KLM took-off without ATC clearance. It happens because of communication misunderstanding between the ATC and the flight crew itself. Therefore, it is important to all aviation authorities to implement the recommendation by the investigators for the safety of operation. It is to ensure the same incident will not happen again in the future. The flight operators should monitor closely all their technical crews and staffs for their behavior and performance. Positive employee will results in positive growth of the company itself thus create a safe-making profit aviation industry. Without positive growth of industry, there will be no positive growth of income for the nation.
Thomas Paine, in the pamphlet Common Sense, succeeded in convincing the indifferent portion of colonial society that America should secede from Britain through moral and religious, economic, and governmental arguments. Using strong evidence, targeting each separate group of people, Thomas Paine served not only to sway the public 's opinion on American independence, but also to mobilize the effort to achieve this ultimatum.
Handling and operating an airplane comes with great risk, but these risks that are present are handled with very different attitudes and dealt with in different ways depending on the environment the pilots are in.
Deficiencies in the Federal Aviation Administration surveillance, poor communication methods used by the airline maintenance teams, the manufacturer, and the FAA. Another factor was the industry lack of consideration to this emergency in operational maintenance and flight
Below I will be analyzing the Responsibility for Accident case to find out the answer about the inquiry of who is responsible for a work accident – the employee or the company? First of all, I am going to look at every fact and different points of view of the case. I will also going to analyze the employee’s complains about the unsafe workplace. On the other hand, I will analyze what is the foreman’s defense to demonstrate that the employee is responsible for the accident and not the company.
According to “A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis…”, both authors stated that HFACS was developed based off from the Swiss Cheese model to provide a tool to assist in the investigation process to identify the probable human cause (Wiegmann and Shappell, 2003). Moreover, the HFACS is broken down into four categories to identify the failure occur. In other words, leading up to adverse events the HFACS will identify the type error occur.
Today, we have better forms of communication and technology, including a collision alarm system, “The collision alarm system not only warns both planes anytime a conflict over air space arises, pilots are given specific instructions to move them out of danger”(Johnson).This definitely helped improve where both the planes are and how to avoid a collision from happening. But on occasion collisions happen from poor maintenance and or pilot’s error, the PSA crash was still one of the worst plane crash in U.S. history, even when it was forty years ago. Though the PSA crash happened due to lack of information and understanding that infromation and taking action, it proved that the airlines need to make careful assumptions of where they are and what other planes are flying around in there direction, and how they can avoid the other
After World War II there was an excess of aircraft and trained pilots in the United States, which significantly increase in private and commercial flights. An increase in the use of private aircraft and large passenger planes meant an increase in the possibly of aircraft safety incidents. Even though safety measures had been put in place to tend to large number of aircraft in the skies, in late 1950’s there were two unfortunate accidents that finally led to legislation that would be a major change to the world of aviation that affects us even today. The introduction of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 spurred several changes in aviation that eventually led to the creation of the Federal Aviation Administration.
In conclusion, many contribution factors led to the Crossair flight 3597 crash but is mainly triggered by Crossair’s incapability of assessment, pilot error and lastly the air traffic controller. Analysis of a flight crash is important so that we will know the causes, thus being able tackle it, making sure that there are no other flight crashes like Crossair flight 3597.
After studying the Aloha aircraft accident in 1933, our group is interested in the investigation in Human performances factors in maintenance and inspection. We have divided the investigation into 5 aspects:
It was the afternoon of July 25, 2000. One hundred passengers, most of them German, boarded the Concorde Air France Flight 4590. This was a trip of a lifetime for many people, as Concorde was restricted to the wealthy class of people. The excitement in people was cut short by the unfortunate delay in flight, because of maintenance in one of its engines. The passengers boarded the plane a couple of hours after the scheduled time. Finally, it was cleared for taxi on runway 26-Right. The pilots lined the aircraft parallel to the runway. A tragic accident, however, was about to befall.
2015-04 recommends operators to re-assess the safety and security risks associated with flight crew members leaving the flight crew compartment due to operational or physiological needs during non-critical phases of flight. Based on this assessment, operators are recommended to implement procedures requiring at least two persons to be in the flight crew compartment at all times, or other equivalent mitigating measures to address risks identified by the operator’s revised assessment.” The SIB recommends that everybody should implement this rule making first a risk assessment, and based on the results, each operator may decide if maintain the “2-persons-in-the-cockpit” procedure as a way of mitigating such risk. At the same time the SIB provides guidance to operators about all the elements to take into account when performing the risk assessment.
The possibility of missing a key piece of evidence is high. Alternative Action 2: Use an existing aircraft to perform tests to determine a possible cause of the incidents. Advantages. Having an entire aircraft that has been in service should display some of the same flaws the incident plane may have been subject too.
The intent of this research is to provide the reader with insight on how Crew Resource Management (CRM) improves safety in aviation organizations. This research will also present how CRM establishes a set of guidelines, behavioral norms, and standard operational practices that enables an organization to utilize all resources available to conduct safe and efficient flight operations. CRM encompasses a wide range of knowledge, skills and attitudes including communications, situational awareness, problem solving, aeronautical decision-making, information management, and teamwork (Royal Aeronautical Society, 1999). CRM is also a synergistic approach to managing flight operations, and allows crews to dynamically multi-task and prioritize work efforts in order to conduct their operations more efficiently and safely. Over the last three decades, the NTSB, NASA, the FAA, ICAO, the military, and the airline industry have created CRM programs, and extensively researched and tested new and innovative ways to incorporate CRM with cockpit automation.
As for employees, it is essential for them to work together and cooperate with one another to prevent any accidents from occurring and to not carry out any actions that may be reckless and bring harm to their fellow colleagues. They are ultimately responsible for the safety of their colleagues and themselves. Failing to do so will not only cause mishaps but it may also result in parties being convicted for breaching this act.
Although workplace accidents are very common, the majority of them can be prevented. As a company, you are obliged by the law to protect your employees, so it is important to take the necessary actions that will minimize the risk of accidents (Intelligent HQ, 2015).