Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Problems with racism in literature
Nationalism political ideology
Literature social racism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Problems with racism in literature
Most of the arguments in the "Ten Responses to Jewish Lackeys" paper are not real arguments. While they try to pose as logical reasoning, they are in reality just propaganda based on racism and hyper-nationalism. The focus seems to provide as many insults as possible instead of fully explained logic.
For instance, Argument 7 is a big heap of nothing. It reads
Argument 7: “The Jew is a human being, too!” — Counterargument: “Of course the Jew is a human being too. None of us has ever doubted it. But a flea is also an animal. But not a very pleasant one. Since a flea is not a pleasant animal, we have no duty to protect and defend it, to take care of it so that it can bite and torment and torture us. Rather, we make it harmless. It is the same
The author believes that the struggle of Jews vs anti-Semites is really just another form of the “rich vs poor struggle” which is existent through many societies in our modern era. The anti-Semites will take out their aggression against the Jews because Jews are an easy target. It is easier for an anti-Semite to accept that he works a hard job for little pay just to make a factory boss rich. However, the question is raised of what good would that do? The anti-Semite needs the job, so he can't quit, and causing an uproar towards his boss would only make him even more unhappy so instead, he channels his hatred in manageable ways, such as toward Jews.
According to the Merriam Webster Dictionary, anti-Semitism is hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group. There are two main types of anti-Semitism: classical anti-Semitism and modern anti-Semitism. Classical anti-Semitism is the hatred and intolerance towards Jews because of their religious differences. According to remember.org,
Resistance: it takes many forms, from the simplest denial to an armed revolt. The Jews exhibited almost every form of resistance against the
Why are the Jews so successful? What is it that makes the Jews so successful, beyond proportion to their numbers? Several theories have been given to explain this. One is that since Jews are constantly being persecuted, their minds had to develop in order to survive. The comedian John Mulaney once said: “Jews don’t daydream, because folks are after them and they gotta stay sharp. You know what I mean? They have to be there. They haven’t let their minds wander since Egypt. They just stay sharp. They go, ‘Who’s that? Put that down. What’s that over there? Don’t do that.’” Since Jews are being prosecuted, they have had to remain alert and their minds developed beyond that of other cultural groups. This theory was given to answer the question of Jewish success, but has never been proven conclusively.
During World War II, the treatment of the Jewish population was horrendous. The Holocaust itself was the annihilation of six million Jews; by 1945 two out of three European Jews had been killed. The Jews felt the effect of more than four hundred decrees and regulations that restrained all aspects of their private and public life by the Nazis. Maus, by At Spiegelman is a prime example of the methods the Nazis used against the Jewish population during the war. The Nazis used methods such as the registration of Jews, placing them in ghettos, and creating concentration camps to control the Jewish population and these methods came with short and long term effects.
When I was younger, I always knew that my mom took her job very seriously, but I was never able to fully comprehend what she did as a teacher. Once I started getting older, I understood that in order to teach certain topics to students, she had to understand a lot about history. One of the topics she studied in order to teach her students was the history of the Holocaust, which indeed is very serious. Then I began hearing that word, “Holocaust,” in school and made the connection. That’s when the seriousness of her job started to resonate with me as a student as well as her daughter. One could probably say that this topic is interesting to virtually everyone who comes across it. However, for the reasons I indicated, it sparks a little bit more of an interest in me than the average person.
Since the beginning of the Judaism, the Jewish people have been subject to hardships and discrimination. They have not been allowed to have a stabile place of worship and have also faced persecution and atrocities that most of us can not even imagine. Three events that have had a big impact on the Jewish faith were the building and destruction of the First Great Temple, the Second Great Temple and the events of the Holocaust. In this paper, I will discuss these three events and also explain and give examples as to why I feel that the Jewish people have always been discriminated against and not allowed the freedom of worship.
We must first realize that resistance was in no way a survival strategy. Yet, even when it seemed obvious that death was near inevitable, why did they not put up a fight? This argument is still puzzling to many holocaust historians, yet the arguments of Raul Hilberg and Yehuda Bauer offer insight to possible reasons why they did not fight and that resistance was more widespread than most people think.
Singer makes a three-part argument for why “All Animals Are Equal”, or at the very least should be granted equal consideration. Firstly, he argues that, assuming all humans are awarded equal rights, there is no single characteristic apart from being human that grants them such rights. Secondly, he argues that awarding rights by virtue of humanity is arbitrary and speciesist. Lastly, he argues that sentience is the only characteristic that should be considered in terms of granting animal rights. This leads him to the conclusion that “if a being suffers, there can be no moral justification for refusing to take that suffering into consideration… The principle of equality requires that its suffering be counted equally with the like suffering – insofar as rough comparisons can be made – of any other being”.
Over the span of the Holocaust over 6 million Jewish people were senselessly tortured and killed. The man in charge of this horrible act is no stranger to history, Adolf Hitler. There is only one logical explanation in my opinion for the way Hitler acted. Paranoia. You can clearly see that as soon as he felt that he was being threatened by someone or some group, he just took them out, like the Jews, the Gypsies, the swing kids, and many more. Hitler was scared or paranoid of having his power taken from him so he did what he thought was the best decision that he could do to protect what little power he did have at the time, which was genocide.
How did the conditions for Jew and Christians change with the Muslim conquest of the Iberian Peninsula and why were the Christians there more disaffected than the Jews?
Many terms have been analyzed, and reanalyzed to universally establish a common definition. However, many of those definitions haven’t been fully accepted in different areas of the world. There is words like genocide, and mass murders, that have different denotations and explanations and can thus, cause implications in terms of consequences. In particular, the word pogrom has had different interpretations since it was first used in the 19th century. In Engel’s article Anti- Jewish violence: Rethinking the Pogrom in East European History, he delineates the importance of interpretation in terms of explaining the word pogrom.
Jewish communities, regardless of denomination, are facing various questions in relation to society at large. Arguably, the most prominent of these questions, is a contemporary and fundamental issue: anti-Semitism. In the present day, Jewish marginalization is often ignored, meaning that individuals do not consider anti-Semitism as a serious enough problem. Media apathy is thriving in regards to this issue as the notion that anti-Semitism is over is one which is being absorbed. In order to overcome this, Jewish communities and individuals are attempting to reinforce positive virtues found in the Tanakh as a way to express their interest in human rights for society at large. Additionally, Jewish activists continuously devote their time to movements that enhance the rights of women, the pursuit of world peace, environmental sustainability, and other issues of social justice. For this reason, an in-depth analysis of positive Jewish responses to anti-Semitism is of utmost importance.
In this essay, I will discuss and define both speciesism and moral individualism in Paola Cavalieri’s book, The Animal Question. Additionally, I will provide my opinion on which is the strongest argument for speciesism and why I still disagree with it. Speciesism is the belief that humans are inherently superior to all other animals, solely based on their species membership. This widely held belief is used to justify the blatant discrimination of nonhuman animals, resulting in a lack of moral rights and the exploitation of defenseless beings. This view, that humans are of special moral status, is constantly attempted to be rationalized in various ways.
The holocaust was a time of Hate and cruelty, The Jewish culture and the people who worshiped it were shunned because the Germans saw them as monsters and Aliens. The Germans had dehumanized them, they made Jewish people feel like trash and that they didn’t belong there.