Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Violence in our society
Violence in contemporary society
Violence in our society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Can you imagine your child, the one who you set up playdates and buy things for because you love him or her, will turn out to be a mass murder? Perhaps, what is like to live with a person who you later find out to have hatred towards the world and humanity? Unfortunate, the surreal and unimaginable tale would unravel for the Rodger family on the tragic day May 23, 2014. Elliot Rodger, the son of Hollywood filmmaker Peter Rodger, went on a rampage that left three of his roommates stabbed to death, three others shot dead, and 14 innocent by-standers injured in Isla Vista, California. The event left many people traumatized, no one would have expected that Rodger can carry out the execution of innocent people, but while searching investigators …show more content…
came across his manifesto and retribution video, they speculate that he has an unstable mind and a troubled life. Unfortunately, people can only theorize that Rodgers’ unstable mind and his experience with social exclusion are the major factors that has triggered the horrific attack near the University of California, San Barbara. Although, amidst the tragedy Rodger is not only a mass murder, but he is a person who exhibit qualities of narcissism, because throughout his manifesto and retribution video, he display statements and actions that are mentioned in the narcissism personality inventory. In his quest, described in his manifesto, to garner attention and admiration, a quality known as exhibitionism in the narcissism personality index, Rodgers would altered his image as a method to gain attention from his peers. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary exhibitionism is defined as, “The act or practice of behaving so as to attract attention to oneself.” In school, when Rodgers see how some of his peers were getting attention for their looks and their behaviors, he would altered his appearance seek attention or to acquire recognition: My first act was to ask my parents to allow me to bleach my hair blonde…Trevor was the first one to notice it…saying that it was very “cool”. Well, that was exactly what I wanted. My new hair turned out to be quite a spectacle, and for a few days I got a hint of the attention and admiration I so craved. (17-18) For Rodgers, the method he used to garner attention was to dye his hair blonde, which one can see from the quote above, that is exactly what he did by asking his parent to allow him to bleach his hair. As Dr. Jean M. Twenge and Dr. W. Keith Campbell, describe in the chapter nine, called Hell Yeah, I’m Hot, of their book, The Narcissism Epidemic, in order to attract attention to themselves many people are going under the knife, to look younger and prettier. By dying his hair, Rodgers is trying to attract the admiration and attention just like the people Twenge and Campbell’s book. Even without revealing to others his new hair color, his classmate Trevor, came up and patted his head, exclaiming how cool Rodgers' new hair style was. In sum, to get the attention he desire Rodger would alter his physical appearance as a way to gain attractiveness like the popular kids at his school. Vanity as a quality in the narcissism personality inventory could be seen in Rodgers excessive pride of his privilege to travel the world. In regard to pride, Emi Furukawa in her article, “Cross-cultural Continuities and Discontinuities in Shame, Guilt, and Pride: A study of Children Residing in Japan, Korea, and the USA,” acknowledge that, “regarding pride, past studies of related constructs suggest that it is socially desirable in US culture” (5). Being the son of a movie producer, Rodgers has the privilege to travel to beautiful destinations with his parents at a very young age, such as Spain, France, and Malaysia. Thus, Rodgers has an opportunity that many people can only dream of having. But, instead of sharing his experience with a humble attitude, in his manifesto he would vainly assert of his adventures: “Only a couple of months after my birth, I went on my first vacation, France… Already a world traveler, I went on a trip to Spain… It was the fourth country I’ve been to at such a young age. At the age of 4, I, Elliot Rodger, had already been to six different countries. Who can claim that, eh? The United Kingdom, France, Spain, Greece, Malaysia, and the United States” (2-3). In Rodger’s manifesto, he recalled his past travel experience as a kid to six countries around the globe. But, along with his recollection of the memory, he depict an attitude that is attribute to vanity, a quality of narcissism, particularly the part where he question, “Who can claim that, eh?” which he is boldly referring to how at just only four years old, he has already traveled to six different countries. Of course that is a great feat to feel prideful of, but as Furukawa has pointed in her article, “US children demonstrated the highest level of pride, reflecting the emphasis of self-enhancement in US culture” (14). Rodger who grew up in America is doing exactly what Furukawa has discussed, he want to enhance his image and to do so, he assert excessive pride of his privilege to travel at a young age. In sum, Rodgers’s recollection of his travel experience with a vain attitude, which portray a quality of narcissism criteria. Another facet of the narcissism personality index is envy, Rodgers in his manifesto and retribution video showcase envious attitudes toward people because he felt inferior in to them.
As Jens Lange and Jan Crusius has refer in their article, “The Tango of Two Deadly Sins: The Social-Functional Relation of Envy and Pride,” they said that, “Envy is a negative emotional response to a situation in which someone lacks another’s superior quality, achievement, or possession and either desires it or wishes the other lacks it (Originally from Parrott & Smith, 1993; Smith & Kim, 2007)” (2). Rodgers in his manifesto and retribution video exclaim illustratively what makes him envious, particularly the cool kids at his school because he would describe how they make him fell inferior because of their look, behaviors, and ability to attract the popular girls at his school or the men in college, who Rodgers stated in his retribution video, who were attracting and obtaining love from all the girls. In his manifesto, Rodgers …show more content…
stated: I was very short for my age…it fully dawned on me that I was the shortest kid in my class— even the girls were taller than me… I became extremely annoyed at how everyone was taller than me, and how the tallest boys were automatically respected more. It instilled the first feelings of inferiority in me, and such feelings would only grow more volatile with time. (15-17) As one can see, Rodgers is envious of others who were taller than him because in school, he exclaim that he was very short for his age.
Furthermore, not only does he said he felt envious of the taller kids, it frustrated Rodgers so much that the envious attitude he has for taller people would, “Remain for the rest of his life.” He was annoyed by the fact that the taller boys would automatically get respect, and that makes him feels inferior. In another example, from his retribution video, Rodgers discuss talk about how he is envious of the, “ popular kids, who lives such life of hedonistic pleasures, while I Have to rotten in loneliness for all these years…They all looked down upon me every time I try to go out and join them… They all treated me like a mouse.” The point is, Rodgers is envious of not only tap people, but he envies popular kids who are living a life of hedonistic pleasure, while he rots in loneliness. Furthermore, he envy them because of the fact that they make him feels inferior, treating him as if he is a
mouse. In essence, from the two examples above one can see how Rodgers display an envious attitude, a facet of the narcissism personality index. The other facet in the narcissism personality inventory that Rodgers portray, particularly in his retribution video, is the act of superiority. Christopher Orlet, the author of an article titled The Look-At-Me Generation, summarizes well about self-worth, a narcissistic quality that Rodgers exhibit, he expresses, “People with an inflated sense of self-worth are more likely to have romantic relationships that are short lived, to be at risk for infidelity, to lack emotional warmth, to be dishonest, and to demonstrate over-controlling and violent behaviors” (3). Rodger discusses in the video how in the day of his retribution, he will show the popular kids—the ones who lived a life of hedonistic pleasures, the sorority girls how rejected him, and people he envied—who is the superior one. He exclaims, “You will then finally see, I am in truth the superior one the true alpha male (pause follow by an evil laugh). Yes, well now I will be a god compared to them, you will be animals… you are animals and I will be a god exacting my retribution” (video). One don't need to carefully watch the video to realize Rodgers’ inflated sense of self-worth. The expression in his words alone, it has already depict a sense of superiority. Words such as alpha male, and god correlate to superiority and that is what Rodgers has implied about himself in the video with phrase “I will be a god… I am the true alpha male.” Furthermore, Rodgers discusses how the people he despise are comparable to animals. In this context, his inflated sense of self-worth, a quality of narcissism, has make him separate himself from others because in his closed-minded perspective, everyone he despise are animals. No one else can compare to his almighty status as the true alpha male or the god who will exact his reattribute on the animals. In general, in Rodger retribution video he show-case a superior attitude to depict himself as someone who is superb and who has excellent qualities, such as those that belong to god or the alpha male.
In the Frontline documentary Raising Adam Lanza, reporters Alaine Griffin and Josh Kovner from “The Hartford Courant” investigate the possibilities that prompted Adam Lanza to commit the horrific shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Lanza didn’t leave behind a trail. Lanza didn’t leave a diary, wasn’t socially involved (had no friends), and destroyed his computer that many believe have the answers as to what induced his character to murder 20 children, six adults, and his own mother. The documentary commenced with Griffin and Kovner exploring the life of Nancy Lanza who had been portrayed by the media as the person to blame for her son’s actions but also to be questioned on whether or not she truly was a victim.
Scott Peterson was an educated man from California Polytechnic State University where he graduated with a B.A. in Agricultural Business. He was married to his wife Laci Peterson who was also pregnant with their unborn son. In December of 2002 Laci Peterson went missing in the Modesto, California area where she shared a home with Scott. Once the investigation of Scott’s missing wife started authorities began to suspect Scott as a suspect in her disappearance. In April of 2003 a fetus and a female torso that was missing hands, feet, and a head were found on the shoreline of San Francisco Bay. The San Francisco Bay area was where Scott was boating the day of Laci’s disappearance. The body was later identified as Laci Peterson and the fetus as Laci and Scott’s unborn son. Scott was also arrested in the month of April shortly after the discovery of Laci and their son’s body and was later sentenced to the death penalty. Over the course of this paper I will cover the whole event of the disappearance of Laci Peterson, relating it to a sociological theory, the impact the event had on our society and how the media had influence over this national event.
A society that presumes a norm of violence and celebrates aggression, whether in the subway, on the football field, or in the conduct of its business, cannot help making celebrities of the people who would destroy it. Unfortunately, such acts of rampage have become a prevalent factor in the Canadian culture. As a result of endless media coverage, Canadians now are constantly bombarded with numerous images of violence. Many of which often portray a victim avenging their opponent by means of force. Thus, indoctrinating a nation of individuals to believe that it is only through aggression that problems can be resolved. Rather than being punished for acts of violence, those who commit such offenses are often praised for their “heroism”. In addition, the success of films like The Godfather, Gladiator, and Troy further aid in reinstating the fact that we live in a society that praises violence. Furthermore, this ideology allows for individuals to partake in violent acts with little or no backlash from ones community. However, when an individual strays away from the “norm”, they are likely to then be viewed as a deviant. Such cases of rejection within a society, are often seen in the portrayal of serial killers. Although our society tends to condone violence when it is directed towards a specific individual(s), it does not allow the killing of innocent bystanders. Instead, crimes that are targeted against a number of people over a long period of time, entail the harshest forms punishments under the law. Sadly, in executing the law for said crimes, those in charge often face much public scrutiny. Such occurrences were apparent in the faulty murder investigations of Canada's most notorious serial killer Robert Pickton. This is due to the ...
The lives of everyone in the town of Springfield Oregon changed on May 21st of 1998. A quiet boy named Kip Kinkel became known as “The Killer at Thurston High” after killing both of his parents, murdering two classmates, and severely injuring 24 others. There are many factors in the 15 year old boy’s life that led up to the horrific events that occurred on that day. The same factors that influenced the tragedy in occurring could have very easily insured that it never happened to begin with.
A society that presumes a norm of violence and celebrates aggression, whether in the subway, on the football field, or in the conduct of its business, cannot help making celebrities of the people who would destroy it, (Lapham, 1985). Unfortunately, such acts of rampage have become a prevalent factor in the Canadian culture. As a result of endless media coverage, Canadians now are constantly bombarded with countless images of violence. Many of which often portray a victim avenging their opponent by force. Thus, indoctrinating individuals to believe that it is only through aggression that problems are resolved. Rather than being punished for acts of violence, those who commit such offenses are often praised for their “heroism”. In addition, the success of films like The Godfather, Gladiator, and Troy further aid in reinstating we live in a society that praises violence. Furthermore, this ideology allows for people to partake in violent acts with little or no backlash from ones community. However, when an person strays away from the “norm”, they are likely to then be viewed as a deviant. Such cases of rejection within a society, are often seen in the portrayal of serial killers. Although our society tends to condone violence when it is directed towards a specific individual(s), it does not allow the killing of innocent bystanders. Instead, crimes that are targeted against a number of people over a long period, entail the harshest forms punishments under the law. Sadly, in executing the law for said crimes, those in charge often face much public scrutiny. Such occurrences were apparent in the faulty murder investigations of Canada's most notorious serial killer Robert Pickton. This is due to the fact that, the negligence of the Vancou...
As typical human beings we all want to know why someone could randomly take the lives of several innocent people all at one time. It is frightening and scientists figure if they can figure out why, then it can be prevented in the future. The documentary, Mind of a Rampage Killer, tries to solve the mystery and really dive deep into the minds of people who could potentially create such a horrifying situation. Through the use of ethos, logos, and pathos, this documentary concludes that every killer had something in common; they all struggled with mental disorders, depression, or outbursts of violence, all stemming from early childhood or an internal battle throughout growing up, some could have even just been born with a violent rage.
Amber Hagerman was a nine year old child who was born on November 25, 1986. She loved to draw, her favorite animal was horses and loved to ride her bicycle daily with her younger brother Ricky. Sadly, one of her favorite hobbies would turn into a horrible memory for her family. She was abducted on January 13th 1998 and murdered on January 17th 1998. She is survived by her parents Donna Norris and Richard Hagerman, her grandparents Jimmie and Glenda Whitson and her younger brother Richard “Ricky” Hagerman. She’s the little girl who died a horrendous unexpected death, but not in vain. Because of her death hundreds of children have been saved. Amber Hagerman’s case will always be an inspiration now and forever.
On August 20th, 1989 Lyle and Erik Menendez killed their parents inside their Beverly Hills home with fifteen shot gun blasts after years of alleged “sexual, psychological, and corporal abuse” (Berns 25). According to the author of “Murder as Therapy”, “The defense has done a marvelous job of assisting the brothers in playing up their victim roles” (Goldman 1). Because there was so much evidence piled up against the brothers, the defense team was forced to play to the jurors’ emotions if they wanted a chance at an acquittal. Prosecutor Pamela Bozanich was forced to concede that “Jose and Kitty obviously had terrific flaws-most people do in the course of reminding jurors that the case was about murder, not child abuse” (Adler 103). Bozanich “cast the details of abuse as cool, calculated lies” (Smolowe 48)...
Family environment and the press are two major influences resulting in the recent tragic school shootings. As much as society continues to focus the killing rampages on factors such as television and music, what children are exposed to in reality contributes to the violence. The most recent school shooting in Michigan involved a six-year-old first grader who killed a classmate with a .22 caliber pistol. The news coverage had vanished after two or three days, and I was left wondering what had happened. Considering the fact that the media wore the Columbine incident out, I wanted to know why they did not pay more attention to this school shooting. As evidence did arrive, it was discovered that the child lived in a household where cocaine, heroin, and many other illegal drugs were commonplace. Also in this “home” guns were easily accessible to the child. Children growing up in this type of environment certainly are likely to be held accountable for future violence. Even though I am against the news media presenting too much school violence, Americans should have been deeply disturbed by this shooting because of the child’s young age. The Michigan shooting should have enlightened Americans to the dilemma we face in this country. Two weeks after the Columbine High School shooting, information on the mass murder was still being broadcast on television. The press was feeding young viewers ideas on how to kill their classmates. News was reported how the teenage murderers acquired information regarding building bombs, obtaining guns, smuggling guns into the school, and proceeding to kill their classmates. A mentally unstable teenager could simply watch these news reports and write a book entitled, “How to Slay Your Classmates”. This onslaught was ridiculous and the news coverage should not have been permitted to continue for countless weeks. Society has determined three reasons on which to blame the shootings. First, the nation blamed it on television’s violent programs. Following that, Americans gave the music recording companies the evil eye as well as attacking the gun manufacturers. All of these reasons involve material objects that are unable to think for themselves. Televisions and CD players do not control themselves, people control them. Finally, boundaries controlling the television programs children view should be set by the parents. The same explanation applies to firearms. How can it be a gun’s fault that a person killed another human being?
This case study involves child killers Jon Venables and Robert Thompson, both 10 years old. They both were charged in the killing and mutilation of two year old James Bulger in 1993.On the day of the killing, both were skipping school and were casually observing children in a busy mall,possibly looking for a victim. Their plan? Find a child to abduct, lead him to the busy road by the mall,and push huim into oncoming traffic. Niether boy knew the exact reason for killing James,other than it just happened. They stole items like,sweets,batteries and a can of blue paint;which was later found at the crime scene. After killing James by beating him with bricks, stomping him, and decided to gether to mutilate their victim. Found guilty on Novemeber 24,1993,they were sentence to prison until they reached age 25.
Moreover, teenagers can be seen as puppets during their childhood until adulthood, they grow up looking for role models in their parents or in their favorite social media person. They often look for cliques in order to fit into the “norm”. It is very possible that children pick up certain violent tendencies when they see television, social media, or experience abuse at home, or are psychologically ill from the start. For instance, Eric Smith, who was convicted as a juvenile at the age of 13 and was retired a decade later, was the alleged murder of the heinously killing and sodomizing of the body of Derrick Robie. The facts have shown “…that as a toddler, Smith threw temper tantrums and banged his head on the floor. He had speech problems, he was held back at school, and he was relentlessly bullied. When he asked for help with his anger, his adoptive father did not seem equipped to give it to him”
As you wind down from a long day at the office, you turn on the six o’clock news. The opening story lays out a gruesome attempt to murder, maim, and terrorize children in a city you have never before heard of. Instantly, you are thinking that this must be a review for a soon to be released blockbuster movie. In your mind, nothing like this would ever happen in our civilized world; however, headlines they are. You picture the perpetrators as horrid, evil-minded monsters. What kind of person could commit such a crime against innocent children? As you listen further, your eyes open wide, your heart skips a beat, and you gasp in shock as you discover that these evil-minded monsters you had just envisioned are nothing more than pimple-faced, hormone driven teenagers. Yes, teenagers. As you begin to really absorb the impact of such a crime, you realize that the teenagers that committed this crime are not much older than your own children. Suddenly, you have the uncontrollable urge to find your children and hide them from the world. You ask yourself, “What is wrong with society? What would cause a child to kill anther child? Where were their parents? How could this have happened?” Then, you try to convince yourself that this could never happen in your community.
Envy is an undesirable trait, eventually leading to the demise of the envious and envied, proving that knowledge on how to overcome envious emotions will aid in successfully obtaining our desires. At the core of envy, is desire and gain. It is in our human nature to desire and long for items and goals that bring enjoyment and a sense of accomplishment. However, the amount of enjoyment and accomplishment will never suffice if envy is involved, because there will always be a need to want more. An appreciation for what is in front of us is needed in order to begin to overcome
...Types of Killers — The Unthinkable — Children Who Kill and What Motivates Them. Turner Entertainment Networks, Inc, n.d. Web. 02 Apr. 2014.
M is nine years old(1). At this young age she has already beaten and tortured a 4 year old girl to death. She presents with absolutely no remorse about the incident. Any regret that she does exhibit is due to the fact that she understands that she is expected to feel apologetic about the incident, not because she intuitively feels remorse. D is ten years old (1). He has already killed a four year old girl because she "was annoying" him. He slapped her so hard that she fell to the ground and consequently died. While in the hospital, he was observed holding another patient's head under the water even after he was told not to do so. S is 10 years old and refuses to go to school. Instead, he runs across the street to play video games with his friend. When he is not over at his friend's house he sets fires for "fun". In addition, he often asked to carry drugs for his father with whom he has intermittent contact. He has been arrested for shop lifting from a local grocery(1). Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris walked into school on April 21, 1999 and killed 23 other people before finally taking their own lives(2). All of these people exhibit symptoms of conduct disorder.