The Documentary: Mind Of A Rampage Killer

880 Words2 Pages

As typical human beings we all want to know why someone could randomly take the lives of several innocent people all at one time. It is frightening and scientists figure if they can figure out why, then it can be prevented in the future. The documentary, Mind of a Rampage Killer, tries to solve the mystery and really dive deep into the minds of people who could potentially create such a horrifying situation. Through the use of ethos, logos, and pathos, this documentary concludes that every killer had something in common; they all struggled with mental disorders, depression, or outbursts of violence, all stemming from early childhood or an internal battle throughout growing up, some could have even just been born with a violent rage. Ethos is established right in the beginning of the film by having an accredited neurologist from Harvard University, Joshua Buckholtz, talk about the issue at hand and how he has been studying this topic for years and trying to find a correlation with the brains of rampage killers working differently as opposed to your typical human being. There were several other examples of ethos with many psychologists adding to the topic. There was a juvenile detention center talked about in the film that deals with kids who struggle with violence and acting out and it is ran by a psychologists who tries to …show more content…

It applied all ethos, logos, and pathos perfectly and was very interesting to watch. Their argument was that people who go on a killing spree are not just doing it for fun, they suffer from mental illness and if people see these signs in someone else, then maybe it can be prevented in the future. This argument doesn’t justify the act of mass killing it simply explains what the cause may be behind it. With the helpful use of rhetoric for their argument, this film set up a very good evidence to back up their argument and open the eyes of viewers to spread

Open Document