Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature and different cultures
Gloria anzaldua essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Academic Analysis: “How to Tame a Wild Tongue” In Gloria Anzaldúa’s piece, “How to Tame a Wild Tongue,” she explores the complex relationship between identity and language. She provides personal vignettes that describe how others have reacted to her use of native language throughout life. Her article illustrates what it is like to be a person who speaks a minority language in a majority population. She introduces the essay by recounting the experience of a dentist capping a tooth and trying in vain to control her tongue. He becomes frustrated as her tongue keeps pushing out the swabs of cotton and instruments. She shares this analogy because to her it represents the role that society plays in systematically pressuring minority language …show more content…
speakers to adopt the majority language. This social manipulation can be direct, such as shaming someone who speaks a native language or it can be indirect, such as allowing easier access to economic benefits such as a higher-paying job for those who assimilate. Anzaldúa grew up along the U.S. and Mexican border, and her native language is a mixture of English and Spanish, known as Chicano Spanish. When she leaves home, she finds that those who speak Standard English and Standard Spanish look down on her when she speaks Spanglish because they view it as a bastardized version of a “pure” language. On the surface, influencing someone to assimilate may seem inoffensive, but the consequences are profound. Anzaldúa says that language is identity, and the process of language assimilation teaches a person that their native tongue is not good enough and by extension, they are not good enough. These lessons become a part of self-identity and are hard to unlearn. In virtually all areas of her life, Anzaldúa finds that people consider her native language invalid, including peers, family members, and authority figures. “I remember being caught speaking Spanish at recess-that was good for three licks on the knuckles with a sharp ruler. I remember being sent to the corner of the classroom for ‘talking back’ to the Anglo teacher when all I was trying to do was tell her how to pronounce my name” (Anzaldúa 15). Her parents encourage her to speak English in order to have a better future. Spanish speakers accuse her of using the “oppressor’s language” when she mixes English words in Spanish conversation. Administrators oppose her request to add Spanish language resources to an English class geared toward Chicano students. Both Spanish and English speakers view Chicano Spanish as illegitimate, and a lifetime of enduring others’ oppressive attitudes reinforces negative feelings of self-worth. In response to these experiences, Anzaldúa uses her essay to expose society’s efforts to manipulate minority speakers by sending negative feedback.
In her opening analogy, the dentist who tries to control her tongue represents the institutions and individuals who insist that she abandon her native tongue. They show disapproval when she speaks Spanish instead of English, or when she speaks Chicano Spanish instead of Standard Spanish or when she speaks English with an accent. Their voices echo in her head, “If you want to be American, speak ‘American.’ If you don’t like it, go back to Mexico where you belong” (Anzaldúa 15). To them, Anzaldúa, and others like her, represent a problem without a solution. They do not know what to do with tongues that break the rules of language and society’s …show more content…
expectations. Even within the realm of Spanish speakers, Anzaldúa finds prejudice. Hispanic and Latin groups perpetuate unspoken rules that dictate a language hierarchy. “Chicanos who grew up speaking Chicano Spanish have internalized the belief that we speak poor Spanish. It is illegitimate, a bastard language” (Anzaldúa 19). Because of this cultural mindset, Chicanos do not feel comfortable speaking their language for fear that it will be used against them. So the remedy is finding ways to keep the native language out of conversation. They try to speak pure Spanish though they are not as skilled as those born in Mexico, or they speak English because it is a neutral language which deflects judgment. They are driven to change their language to avoid negative bias. Because of others’ beliefs, they cannot feel pride when speaking their native tongue. Anzaldúa and those who resist assimilation are trying to preserve who they are.
Their past lives straddle two parallel cultures, and their mixed language reflects this geography. Chicano Spanish springs from their history and enables them to communicate their experiences, realities, and values. The challenges of a desert environment mirror the challenges of retaining language and identity. Like her tongue that pushes out the dentist’s instruments, Anzaldúa rejects those who use shame and other social control to push her toward assimilation. “I will no longer be made to feel ashamed of existing. I will have my voice: Indian, Spanish, White, I will have my serpent’s tongue-my woman’s voice: my sexual voice, my poet’s voice. I will overcome the tradition of silence” (Anzaldúa 20). Instead of assimilation, she embraces her identity and the idea of integration. She wants to inhabit both cultures without judgment. She wants to teach about both English and Spanish writers, she wants to listen to both rock-and-roll and Tex-Mex music, she wants to watch both American and Mexican film, and she wants to read both English and Spanish works. This is only possible when those around her accept all aspects of her
identity. In conclusion, Anzaldúa uses her essay, “How to Tame a Wild Tongue” to explore the complex relationship between identity and language. She recounts experiences in which the Chicano Spanish that she speaks is not accepted by the larger society. When others react negatively to her native language, their prejudices impact her self-esteem. The future that she envisions includes a world in which she can be proud of the many languages that she speaks. The future that she envisions includes a world in which she can be proud of all of the aspects of her identity, whether female, poet, Indian, white, or Spanish. Work Cited Anzaldúa, Gloria. “How to Tame a Wild Tongue.” Readings on Writing, edited by Cactus May, Talitha May, and Mara Holt, 3rd ed., Van-Griner, 2016, pp. 15-24.
Preceding her youth, in 1977, Anzaldua became a High School English teacher to Chicano students. She had requested to buy Chicano texts, but was rejected to do so. The principal of the school she worked for told her, in Anzaldua’s words: “He claimed that I was supposed to teach “American” and English literature.” She then taught the text at the risk of being fired. Anzaldua described, “Being Mexican is a state of soul – not on of mind.” All in all, the reprimanding she had to endure only made her stronger: “Until I can take pride in my language, I cannot take pride in myself.” It led to Anzaldua embracing her Mexican culture even more, contrary to shoving it aside. Anzaldua transformed her beliefs into something both cultures can applaud, and be honored
Rodriguez views the same as a public and private language. He explains that the term “private” relates to Spanish language, while the term “public” is the kind of English language he speaks outside home. As he writes “… I wrongly imagined that English was intrinsically a public language and Spanish an intrinsically private one…” (513). In addition, Rodriguez’s reference to the English language as a gringo sound gives an impression of a child’s resentment towards said language. The term gringo in Spanish means los gringos which is a “derogatory term for English-speaking Americans” (512). When Rodriguez parents stopped communicating at home in Spanish, the laughter at home faded along with his private language. This further supports Rodriguez’s statement that “… as we learned more and more English, we shared fewer and fewer words with our parents” (515). Thus the end of a once full of laughter home, yet the beginning of Rodriguez’s mastery of the English language. Similar to Tan’s experience, the writer’s rebellious nature challenged her critics by proving that Asian’s skills are not limited to Math and Science. Thus, the decision behind to shift from pre-med to English major. As Tan writes, “I happen to be rebellious in nature and enjoy the challenge of disproving assumptions made about me” (510). Hence Tan’s strong conviction to resist the convention of
In “Se Habla Español,” the author, Tanya, talks about her personal experience with dealing with language issues. Tanya was born in Guatemala and moved to the U.S when she was only three years old. Tanya’s mother did not want her to speak Spanish, because they believed that when they moved to the U.S speaking only English would help her blend in. For so long Tanya believed that speaking Spanish went hand in hand with being poor and speaking only English made her feel superior. After many years she has tried to learn Spanish but has found it quite difficult because although that is her native language it was like trying to learning a whole new language for her. In “Mother Tongue,” Amy’s explains how she has come to the realization that she speaks more than one “English,” meaning that the way she speaks in front of a crowd is different than the way she speaks with her mother. The way Amy speaks with her mother is still English although it is not proper. Amy expresses how she does not really like the phrase “broken English,” because if something is broken it needs to be fixed and she does not feel that her mother’s English needs to be
Anzaldua grew up in the United States but spoke mostly Spanish, however, her essay discusses how the elements of language began to define her identity and culture. She was living in an English speaking environment, but was not White. She describes the difficulty of straddling the delicate changing language of Chicano Spanish. Chicano Spanish can even differ from state to state; these variations as well as and the whole Chicano language, is considered a lesser form of Spanish, which is where Anzaldua has a problem. The language a person speaks is a part...
Have you ever felt like you didn’t belong somewhere? Do you know what it feels like to be told you don’t belong in the place of your birth? People experience this quite frequently, because they may not be the stereotypical American citizen, and are told and convinced they don’t belong in the only place they see as home. In Gloria Anzaldúa’s “How to Tame a Wild Tongue”, Anzaldúa gives the reader an inside look at the struggles of an American citizen who experiences this in their life, due to their heritage. She uses rhetorical appeals to help get her messages across on the subliminal level and show her perspective’s importance. These rhetorical appeals deal with the emotion, logic and credibility of the statements made by the author. Anzaldúa
Torres, Hector Avalos. 2007. Conversations with Contemporary Chicana and Chicano Writers. U.S.: University of New Mexico press, 315-324.
of the native tongue is lost , certain holidays may not be celebrated the same , and American born generations feel that they might have lost their identity , making it hard to fit in either cultures . Was is significant about this book is the fact it’s like telling a story to someone about something that happened when they were kid . Anyone can relate because we all have stories from when we were kids . Alvarez presents this method of writing by making it so that it doesn’t feel like it’s a story about Latin Americans , when
As Rodriguez is looking back at the rise of his “public identity”, he realizes that “the loss implies the gain” (Rodriguez 35). He believes that losing a part of who you (such as your “mother tongue” is permitted since
At the beginning of the essay, Anzaldúa recounts a time when she was at the dentist. He told her, “We’re going to have to control your tongue” (33). Although he was referring to her physical tongue, Anzaldúa uses this example as a metaphor for language. The dentist, who is trying to cap her tooth, symbolizes the U.S. who is similarly seeking to restrict the rights of minority groups. Nevertheless, the tongue is preventing the dentist from doing his job. Likewise, there are several minority groups who refuse to abide to the laws of dominant cultures and are fighting back. Anzaldúa also touches on a personal story that happened at school. When she was younger, she was sent to the corner because apparently, she spoke back to her Anglo teacher. The author argues that she was unfairly scolded because she was only telling her teacher how to pronounce her name. Her teacher warned her, “If you want to be American, speak American. If you don’t like it, go back to Mexico where you belong.” This short story provides an understanding of what Anzaldúa’s life was like. It demonstrates how even at a young age, she was continually pressured because of where comes
Rodriguez highlights comfortable, soothing, and intimate sounds of his family language by saying, “Spanish seemed to me the language of home. It became the language of joyful return. A family member would say something to me and I would feel myself specially recognized. My parents would say something to me and I would feel embraced by the sounds of their words. Those sounds said: I am speaking with ease in Spanish. I am addressing you in words I never use with los gringos. I recognize you as someone special, close, like no one outside. You belong with us. In the family”. The private language is like an intimate secret code among the family. Despite the struggle with their family languages, the author understands that the private language being spoken has been a large part of their lives and has helped shaped their view of the
The contrast between the Mexican world versus the Anglo world has led Anzaldua to a new form of self and consciousness in which she calls the “New Mestiza” (one that recognizes and understands her duality of race). Anzaldua lives in a constant place of duality where she is on the opposite end of a border that is home to those that are considered “the queer, the troublesome, the mongrel and the mulato” (25). It is the inevitable and grueling clash of two very distinct cultures that produces the fear of the “unknown”; ultimately resulting in alienation and social hierarchy. Anzaldua, as an undocumented woman, is at the bottom of the hierarchy. Not only is she a woman that is openly queer, she is also carrying the burden of being “undocumented”. Women of the borderlands are forced to carry two degrading labels: their gender that makes them seem nothing more than a body and their “legal” status in this world. Many of these women only have two options due to their lack of English speaking abilities: either leave their homeland – or submit themselves to the constant objectification and oppression. According to Anzaldua, Mestizo culture was created by men because many of its traditions encourage women to become “subservient to males” (39). Although Coatlicue is a powerful Aztec figure, in a male-dominated society, she was still seen
In the essay, “How To Tame A Wild Tongue”, by Gloria Anzaldua and the essay, Mother Tongue, by Amy Tan, the ignorance shown by many people is highlighted. Amy Tan’s essay focuses on how some people look down on others who do not speak English without an accent. Anzaldua’s essay focuses on how people do not have a broad view of language and often look down upon others who do not speak the language that they speak. Both of the essays address language, but the broader topic that they acknowledge is more important. The essays both acknowledge how humans feel uncomfortable around people that are different from them, and often demean others. People demean others due to people wanting to look more powerful by giving their views correctness while discrediting
The struggle to find a place inside an un-welcoming America has forced the Latino to recreate one. The Latino feels out of place, torn from the womb inside of America's reality because she would rather use it than know it (Paz 226-227). In response, the Mexican women planted the seeds of home inside the corral*. These tended and potted plants became her burrow of solace and place of acceptance. In the comfort of the suns slices and underneath the orange scents, the women were free. Still the questions pounded in the rhythm of street side whispers. The outside stare thundered in pulses, you are different it said. Instead of listening she tried to instill within her children the pride of language, song, and culture. Her roots weave soul into the stubborn soil and strength grew with each blossom of the fig tree (Goldsmith).
Julia Alvarez was an example of how a Latina writer identified herself in a new culture outside of her comfort zone. She, as a Dominican Diaspora, had to reinvent herself as she migrated into a new scenario. Her assimilation into the United States culture allowed her to understand and relate to the reader’s needs and points of interests. After all the effort, Alvarez kept in mind that she could not comfort to all the reality that she lived in, so she re-reinvented herself all over again to process her thoughts and beliefs into her life. She put her perspective on her writing so that the new wave of readers, even if they did not understand, could relate in some way and appreciate the differences. The sole purpose of her writings was for everyone to change their perspective from “walk to the other side of the street in order to avoid sharing the same sidewalk” to “I do not know them, but I do not avoid them because I do not know them”. She instilled in her reader’s mind how ordinary events were viewed differently through other cultures’ eyes. Her story Snow was a great example of how she portrayed her technique.
She realized the value of her language when she lost it and now treasures it. The kind of Spanish she speaks is neither English nor Spanish, but both. It is overflowing with culture from Medieval Spain, France, Germany, etc., just from the origins of the words. It is her pride and a representation of herself, fighting and living. In conclusion, in addition to Lera Boroditsky’s article proving that the structure of language affects how we think, the articles by Eric Liu, Amy Tan, and Gloria Anzaldua show how language is a foundation for a person’s culture, pride, and self.