Tacit Experience And Perspective Essay

Tacit Experience and Perspective The management of knowledge within the context of organizational processes is a determining factor of its effectiveness and level of performance. Hislop (2013) stated, "One of the key distinctions in the knowledge management literature relates to epistemology" (p. 8). In an attempt to acquire an in-depth understanding of key aspects of knowledge management I will analyze a key organizational job position that possesses valuable experience and traits of fulfilling responsibilities. My analysis will include a description of the organization and position, a review of the perspectives and types of knowledge, as described by Hislop (2013), as they relate to the job position, and the challenges encountered in transferring

In the application of both perspectives knowledge is perceived in two types which include tacit or implicit knowledge and explicit or objective knowledge (Hislop, 2013). In regards to tacit knowledge Hisplop (2013) described it as, "...knowledge which is difficult to articulate in an explicit form, is regarded as more informal, more personal and individualized, less rigorous and highly subjective, being embedded within the cultural values and assumptions of those who posses and use it" (p. 18). On the other hand, explicit knowledge is described by Hislop (2013) as being, "...expressed in formal and systematic language and shared in the form of data, scientific formulae..." (p. 18-19). Both types of knowledge according to Hislop (2013) are utilized differently by both the objectivist and practice-based perspective. The objectivist prefers the use of explicit knowledge and claims that both types of knowledge are separated from one another and believes that tacit knowledge can be converted to satisfy its process of codifying information to make it more transferrable (Hislop, 2013). The practice-based perspective, in contrast, believes that both types of knowledge are inseparable and work together to develop in part explicit knowledge bust most of all a system of management that focuses on activities involving both the mind and body (Hislop, 2013). These differences will undoubtedly generate both problems in challenges in the application of information management in an organization. The lead teacher position, due to the districts educational philosophy of generating and following a rigid curriculum, will consequently experience challenges leading teachers of practice-based perspective in an environment that follows an objectivist perspective in