Synthesis Essay On Blue And Blue

Pink is a girl color and blue is a boy color, I'm quite sure we all have heard of this stereotypical and cliché statement before. I want you all to imagine standing in front of public restrooms. Imagine only to encounter that the female and male toilet doors have no indication to which is assigned to which gender. However, you do notice that one toilet door is pink and as you have probably guessed it, the other is blue. Now you being a female, which one would you enter? I think the answer is clear here. Even though there’s no words on the doors, the color-coding is enough to tell us which one we should enter.

It’s interesting to see what makes us think that the pink color is an indication of femininity and delicacy while the blue color denotes

During the 19th century, all babies and toddlers, regardless of sex were typically dressed in almost identical unisex all white clothing because pink and blue were not considered gender specific colors and were used interchangeably .It wasn’t until the late 1800s, that pink and blue started to be associated with sex, but there was still little agreement as to which symbolized which gender. It is interesting to note that pink and blue denoted different meanings than to what they do now. Blue was the color for girls as it was very delicate and dainty and pink which was seen as stronger and more assertive, was for boys. However this idea gradually changed over time. So with all this, how can we let society play with our perception of colors and lead us to judge or stereotype people due to the color which they like or prefer to clothe in? Where in fact not even society has had a clear idea of which color represents which gender. Therefore, any sensible person would think that it’s completely absurd to be wanting to follow this illogical concept, which hasn't even been around for a century. This was also during the time when manufacturers saw that there was more money to be made in producing sex specific clothing. For example if parents had a girl and then a boy they couldn't hand down the first child’s clothing to the second and would have to

One very discrete example, which demonstrates the power of pink and blue in defining the genders of children, is toys. Research by Elizabeth Sweet, a doctoral candidate in sociology at the University of California, has supported the belief that gender stereotyping of toys is getting worse over time. Writing in the New York Times last year, she said: ''We've made great strides toward gender equity over the past 50 years, but the world of toys looks a lot more like 1952 than 2012. 'During my research into the role of gender in Sears’s catalogue toy advertisements over the 20th century, I found that in 1975, very few toys were explicitly marketed according to gender, and nearly 70 percent showed no markings of gender whatsoever. ‘But by 1995, the gendered advertising of toys had crept back to mid-century levels, and it’s even more extreme today.'' In fact, finding a toy that is not marketed either explicitly or subtly for a specific gender, through the use of color has become incredibly