Swot Analysis Case

392 Words1 Page

Strengths: Travis greets the client in a polite tone. The call ends with the MB taking back the call to confirm with the underwriting team and the call ends politely. Inches: Verification- Travis does not verify the client with at least 3 pieces of ID. This is to ensure we are protecting the client's personal information and Identity. CRD- We should also provide the CRD to the client prior to verification for legal and compliance reasons. Effective notes- Travis added detailed coding, however, his notes lack the details of the actions that took place in the call. Moving forward let's be sure to include all information for accurate LJN in case it is needed for reference in the future. Word choice- technology poor light- ( 4:45) Travis presented our technology in a poor …show more content…

If the client reflects info that conflicts with our internal info, suggest using resources such as Quick Share etc. to share screens and confirm information. Empathy- throughout the call the client seemed confused and a bit agitated about the info he is looking for. There was not any empathy provided throughout the call to show the client our care and concern for any inconvenience caused. Actively listening- ( 3:42) (4:26) There were a couple instances where Travis seems distracted in the call and misses key information the client provides, resulting in the client repeating himself. We should remain focused and engaged in our call to guide the client through the process and acknowledge all info stated by the client. Clear, gump, and concise- Utilizing resources-Consider using resources to confirm the status of the document in question. In Xbert, tracking items, the Property disclosure confirms cleared by the underwriting team earlier in the day. This would avoid any unnecessary time spent locating the document and the client's

Open Document