Summary Of Mary Roach's Essay Don 'T Jump'

1103 Words3 Pages

A Barrier to Death
Dying is never lovely. Mary Roach, defines in her essay Don’t Jump, her craving to securely experience the sensations of dropping from a precipice, as if she wanted to end her life. Suggesting in the essay, “that jumping-off San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge would be a lovely way to go” (Roach, 2001). There are people that are desperate in life and choose this picturesque setting; the beauty of protruding boulders speckled within the grassy covered hills; the silhouette of San Francisco pasted against the horizon or the white capped blue Pacific waves to edge of Earth. If the scenery does not relax, the soothing repetition of the bay hammering the shore and the tower pylons has a hypnotic affect. Such beauty, yet there …show more content…

Interviewing people that have experienced the results of people leaping off the span provided the sad reality of those that seek to leave their agony. Often using morbid humor to make her point, she quoted Sgt. Lopez, “A lot of times, we pull bodies out with crabs hanging off them, speculating that crabs consider people a delicacy as much as people consider crabs” (Roach, 2001). The physics of how people perish is described in graphic detail to vulgar extremes. The majority of her writing is devoted to the descriptive recovery and unattractive nature of the jumper’s condition. Explaining how there are systems in place on the bridge to spot possible attempts to dive off the bridge Sgt. Lopez feels, “if they can get there before people jump there is a ninety-nine percent chance to stop them.” The only solution noted in the article is to put up fencing to keep people from jumping; however, she does not expand on the safety issue only to summarize with humor. Comparing the Bridge District’s reluctance to spoil the view by incorporating a barrier, to the spoiled view of a decomposed corpse (Roach, …show more content…

At one time, the city council considered a resolution to repel the jumpers, the installation of a net under the structure to capture the bodies before they could be broken. Approved in 1998, no financial resources were made available to further the protective apparatus. In 2008, a poll had half the surveyed reject a barrier feeling it would not prevent suicide and felt using tax money to prevent suicide was futile. However, to separate opposing lanes of traffic, the Authority spent $26.5 million for a center median to prevent head-on collisions. Since 1970, there were sixteen death cause by head-on collisions and 1129 known suicides (Gross, 2013), so the body pieces continue to be picked up. The cost of the first responders, medical examiners and the Coast Guard would seem to more than then the millions spent that would of help prevent sixteen head-on collision deaths. The distracted driver, the intoxicated driver appears to have more value than the suicidal

Open Document