Analysis Of The Bridge By Franz Kafka

1807 Words4 Pages

Franz Kafka’s, “The Bridge” is a short, three paragraph story that raises as many questions as it dramatically addresses. With relatively few words, Kafka speaks volumes elicited from the story’s setting, materiality, and the action that takes shape throughout. By examining the relationship between Kafka’s use of the literal and the figurative, namely a man who fashions himself in the likeness of a bridge, this paper explores several possible meanings imminent in the text with special attention to absurdity and its functions. The Bridge by Franz Kafka was a short story published posthumously in 1931 (bio.com). It is a three paragraph story about a bridge. That is grasping on to each side of a ravine. Having never had a visitor until the day …show more content…

It’s a bridge someone or some group of people had to build it. An undertaking that sounds like no easy task as it seems to be spanning a ravine of unknown depth. At the bottom of which lies an “icy trout stream”(Kafka 18) full of “sharp rocks”(Kafka 18). Built into now crumbling clay, a material that sounds neither strong or easy to build a bridge into. A bridge is not a person, it is a thing. A bridge does not hang there wondering each morning “was it the first, was it the thousandth?”(Kafka 18). This sounds like the thoughts of someone who’s days are devoid of joy or meaning. So much so that the days are indiscernible from one another. Just when this bridge or person may never fulfill pr find a purpose a lone patron is heard coming …show more content…

For this bridge its fall was inflicted by an unknown patron. One who’s identity or existence we never see verified. The record of the fall is short in the story described as only being for a moment. Then the bridge was finally introduced to “the sharp rocks which had always gazed up at me so peacefully from the rushing water”. Rocks gazing peacefully? This is almost as absurd as a bridge turning around. An action that the bridge itself cannot seem to believe it is doing. This attempt by the bridge was his final effort before his fall. I cannot even picture how a bridge would turn around and attempt to look on his back. The question that comes to my mind is how can a bridge see what’s on his back? If this book is trying to make us believe that this bridge is a human, or has human like qualities. Then how flexible a person is this bridge? Because I know very few people who can see whats on their back. Especially without turning so much that anything on their back would fall off. So is this bridge so inflexible that it breaks itself by turning around or is it trying to buck off its attacker unintentionally? This answer is never answered due to the story ending shortly thereafter this scene. With the short fall of the bridge onto the sharp rocks it had stared at for the entirety of its life. The events before and during the fall of the bridge was the main issue I had with my thesis that the bridge was

Open Document