Strategic Level Of Operation Plan

1223 Words3 Pages

The U.S. Army faced a new, prolonged challenge in the Philippines following the seizure of Manila in 1898. Based on Washington’s policy, the Army and Navy coordinated a basic long-term strategy that directed the Army to pacify the Filipinos and support the fortification of Luzon as an expeditionary staging area for the Navy. Four significant events shaped the region militarily over the next twenty years. The first was Russia’s two-fold defeat in 1905 at the hands of the Japanese. The second was the 1907 Japanese invasion scare, which reinforced the long-term belief that America and Japan would go to war in the Pacific. The third was the continuous change in Navy strategy due to technological advances and the rise of the Imperial Japanese …show more content…

When an operational plan created by a joint warfighting commander articulates a maneuver, each supporting command generates its own scheme of maneuver and/or movement to assist the operational commander in completing the assigned mission. The resulting aggregate capability requirement requires synchronization and prioritization. Done properly, these actions allow for a comprehensive understanding of feasibility. This can only occur after completing all …show more content…

In order to describe the strategic level of war, doctrine refers to national strategy, theater strategy, and strategic plan . The operational level receives the monikers contingency plan, campaign plan, operational plan, and supporting plan. These strategies and plans are not executable unless they are synchronized. It is remarkably hard to do this, as demonstrated by figure 1, which shows the number of military plans that must be synchronized to support either a combined sub-unified command or combined joint task force. Added to this is additional synchronization with interagency and coalition partners at the various echelons. How hard could it be to win a war? The answer, of course, is very hard. Strategic and operational level planning involves the blending of art and science to understand how means and ways can be variously combined to meet the desired end. Using the operational planning processes, each organization invariably produces its own plan with an associated list of requirements, including authorities and capabilities. Authorities include mission command relations, rules of engagement, deployment and employment guidance, mobilization authorities, access authorities for foreign locations, and the budget necessary to conduct operations. Capabilities describe tactical units, echelons of headquarters, and staff

Open Document