Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Imperialism in the spanish american war
Imperialism in the spanish american war
Essays on spanish/filipino american war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Imperialism in the spanish american war
The Philippine War of 1899, was opposed by many Americans and was fought for three years, resulting in tons of deaths and U.S taking over Philippine Island. As an annexation of Philippine was important for U.S economy, I believe that there were other ways to take over the Philippine Island rather than a War. There were several of reasons that led to Philippines- American War, but two of the main were the Philippine’s rejecting the Treaty of Paris and McKinley- Roosevelt belief in war. However War wasn’t something that was intended, but due to the denial of America by Philippine’s resulted in War. “When the Treaty of Paris provided for U.S ownership rather than independence, Filipinos felt betrayed” (Goldfield et al, 710). According to me, U.S could have very easily tackled the issue by attaching a document at the end of Treaty of Paris, which proposes the bicameral government under one branch controlled by two separate powers the Philippine’s and the U.S. “More than anyone, Roosevelt used the war to advance not only his political career but also the glory of national expansionism” …show more content…
(Nash 689). McKinley’s idea of War led to Treaty of Paris begin passed by congress, Anti-Imperialism amongst the folks of U.S and exposure and exaggeration by cartoonist. Where cartoonist on one side were definitely adding a spice to the Pictures, there is no denial in the fact that the Philippines- American war was as brutal as it could possibly be. The end results of Philippines- American was were extremely devastating, as tons of lives were lost.
“Before it ended in 1902, some 126,500 Americans troops served in the Philippines, 4,234 died there, and 2,800 more were wounded. The cost was $400 million.” (Nash 689). Those are just the number of U.S soldiers, as Philippines lost forty times more the U.S. The loss was extreme, but goal was achieved and U.S had one more Island to its name. During the ongoing War Open Door policy was issued in 1899 preventing China to be taken over by European Countries. Trade with in the Asia, mainly China was the reason behind U.S helping Philippines fight against Spain and annexation of Philippine Island through war. Imperialism, the hunger to trade internationally and forming the world’s strongest resulted in U.S annexation of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and Philippine Island under the Treaty of Paris of
1898. As war of Philippines was over in 1902, soon after Panama Canal was put into project and Cuba was taken over by U.S in 1909. However, this wasn’t the end of Wars and Imperialism, The World War is yet to take place.
The first reason the United States should have annexed the Philippines is because it is our duty to as a country to spread the values of democracy overseas. For example, as stated here in Albert J. Beveridge’s campaign speech he says, “ Do we owe no duty to the world?… it is ours to save for liberty and civilization (Doc B).” He is saying that it is our duty as a sovereign nation to help an uncivilized nation modernize, industrialize, . another example, is from William Mcki...
In my opinion The United States ordeal with Annexing the Philippines and the idea that we had of going into war with them was great mistake and should have been avoided. The Filipinos and Americans were deadlocked in war with each other. This all became a controversy with the two nations in 1898 when the Treaty of Paris between Spain and the United Stated ceded all seven thousand islands of the Philippine archipelago to the United States, for just a mere twenty-million dollars. Congress had approved the treaty with Spain, by February of 1899. Mckinley was on the verge of calling for the annexation of the Philippines which brought on a bloody two year struggle. In my opinion the United States was the cause of all of this because of three different reasons, for one our government would not...
United States of America. U.S. Department of State. Office of the Historian. The Philippine-American War, 1899-1902. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Mar. 2014
... Americans built roads, schools, bridges, and sewers. Filipino self- rule had gradually increased and finally declared their independence on July 4, 1946. However, compared to Cuba and Puerto Rico, American rule has a lesser impact on the Philippine economy. The United States invaded Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines not to gain wealth, but for the purpose of getting trades.
The United States should not annex the Philippine islands, the Philippines, already a country of their own should not be forced to adapt to American culture and civilization. Prior to the annexation of the Philippines, America had major conflict with Spain in order to free Cuba from their brutal tactics for dominance. Tension continued to rise, until President Mckinley decided to take action and go to war against Spanish forces to enable a more stable government as well as provide protection for the citizens of Cuba. After months of fighting, the Spanish admitted defeat and began discussing peace terms of the Treaty of Paris. In this treaty Cuba was guaranteed independence, also the Spanish were forced to give up Guam and Puerto Rico. They Spanish also complied to selling the Philippines to the U.S for 20 million. However, the Filipinos wanted independence, not just a change in who governed them, this desire led many Philippine citizens to break out, beginning the Philippine- American war, which lasted three years, and caused the death of over two hundred thousand American and Filipino citizens.
He instantly pulled back government support for American speculators abroad and forced Congress to give expanded (yet not finish) control of the Panama Canal to Panama. In 1916, he marked the Jones Act, which made the Philippines an authority U.S. region and guaranteed Filipinos freedom once they set up a steady government. Wilson did, be that as it may, send troops to Haiti, the Dominican Republic, and Cuba and obtained the U.S. Virgin Islands from Denmark in
There are many similarities and differences between the Philippine Insurrection of the late nineteenth century and the Vietnam War of the late twentieth century. Types of warfare and atrocities committed during both conflicts are comparable, while factors such as war objectives and motivations differ greatly. I personally feel that the United States had a better cause for fighting the Vietnam War, even though it was our first major military defeat. Despite the American loss, it was more worthwhile to fight in the Vietnam War than in the Philippine Insurrection because the United States had a more laudable reason for involvement. American involvement in the Philippine crisis represented a brave new step for the country because it had emerged from its former state of isolation. However, by the time the Vietnam War began, America felt obligated to participate simply because it was the most powerful nation in the world militarily and had much experience in warfare and foreign relations.
The United States had decided to grant its independence to the Philippines in the year of 1946. Along the way it had also liked the idea of the British removal from India, and it had even really wanted France to give up its control of Indochina.
The truth is I didn’t want the Philippines, and when they came to us, as a gift from the gods, I did not know what to do with them.… I sought counsel from all sides— Democrats as well as Republicans—but got little help. I thought first we would take only Manila; then Luzon; then other islands perhaps also. I walked the floor of the White House night after night until midnight; and I am not ashamed to tell you, gentlemen, that I went down on my knees and prayed Almighty God for light and guidance more than one night. And one night late it came to me this way… that we could not give them back to Spain… that we could not leave them to themselves— they were unfit for self-government… [and] that there was nothing left for us to do but to take them all, and to educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize and Christianize them, and by God’s grace do the very best we could by them.” (Thomas G. Paterson and Dennis
The aftermath of the Spanish-American war was very complicated and filled with issues that needed to be resolved. After Spain lost the Spanish-American war, Spain gave up its colony in the Philippines to the U.S. This brought up the issue of whether the United States of America should annex the Philippines. War between America and Spain was a war that decided something. The U.S should have annexed the Philippines because the Philippines was unable to self-govern, another country would annex the Philippines if the U.S. didn’t, and the fact that the U.S. could provide things that would, in America’s eyes, benefit the Philippines, like education and religion.
In 1898, the United States warred with Spain on two fronts; Cuba and the Philippines. This was under the pretext that the Spanish government was treating the natives of both island nations badly,and that the two nations did not deserve to be ruled unjustly. Of course, there were other reasons for the initiation of the war, but keeping with that, the United States ousted the Spanish in a short amount of time from both countries. Then, with the liberation of the countries, America had a choice of how to exert their influence upon those states; Cuba was shortly granted their independence, but the Philippines were another matter. In October of the same year the U.S. went to war, and they decided to annex the Philippines; gain control of the country and install an American Government upon it. Therefore U.S. should have annexed the Philippines because it was Manifest Destiny and, because of the strategic location that allows to strengthen themselves both economically and militarily.
The United States did what they had to do in order to show other countries that we were a strong independent country. We were no longer a weak country that was connected to Britain. For the American-Mexican War President James K. Polk had to do what he had to do. He wanted Texas as one of our states and so did Mexico. In order to annex Texas we had to go to war.
Relations between the United States and the Philippines has been pleasant yet tumultuous at times. Even before America set foot into the country, Filipinos had endured years of abuse at the hands of Spain. The Philippines was promised that if they became allies with America to defeat Spain during the Spanish-American War of 1898, they would finally be able to govern themselves. The signing of a peace treaty between the two fighting countries meant that the war was over. In order for the treaty to be valid, America had to pay Spain $20 million, which resulted in full control over the Philippines now. The Filipinos retaliated as a result of this because the opportunity of rulin...
The war in the Pacific started on December 7, 1941 when the Japanese launched a surprise attack on the United States naval base, Pearl Harbor. The war continued on until V-J Day on September 2, 1945, when the Japanese surrendered. One of the key factors of the Japanese surrender was the dropping of the atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. If the United States did not drop the atomic bomb, the war would have lasted for much longer. The atomic bomb attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki quickened the ending of the war, ultimately saving more lives than if the Japanese mainland was invaded.
There were several policies in place at the time, some which were put into place before the war, some during the war, and some after. The ratification of the annexation process was long and difficult. There were debates as to how to treat the Filipino people. One suggestion was to treat the Filipinos as dependents, and not citizens, like the Native Americans came to be treated. Many of the imperialists believed that the Filipinos were savages and harsh policies would give America control. The anti-imperialists were not exactly sure whether to treat them as peers or to set them free. I would treat them as equals, as normal people, as they are like everyone else. At the time they might not have been as technologically advanced as we were, and their government may have seemed primitive to ours. I think we should have worked with them to help create a government, rather than occupy and just take over.