Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of digital technology on society
Impact of technology in
Impact of technology in
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of digital technology on society
Many people worked for Eastman Kodak, including Steven Sasson -- inventor of the digital camera. According to James Estrin, writer at the New York Times, Sasson started working for Kodak in 1973 and was given the task of figuring out if the charged coupled device (C.C.D) was feckless or not; two years late he invented the process of modern day photography (para 1-3). Sassons discovery was unexpected because hardly anyone knew he was working on this due to the fact it was not thought to be a big project. Estrin also explained many photographers were unhappy with his discovery claiming it ruined their profession; nevertheless, that did not stop Sasson from showing his portable camera to all of his bosses bosses until the first customer bought …show more content…
The Digital Public Library of America states almost all camera stores, photo labs, and film companies have become obsolete due to all of the technology advancements that have occured over time (para 29). The need for physical prints has dramatically minimized due to the digital essence of file sharing, which has impacted photo processing businesses. The Digital Public Library of America also states although many universities still offer traditional photography programs, digital photography is still number one on the charts (para 30). Edding software such as photoshop allows anyone with computer access to alter their pictures to one's liking. Although one may think this would increase the demand for professional photographers, that is not the case. With all of the technology advancements taking place, many find hiring someone to take their picture a waste of money. The Chicago Sun-Times found it so unuseful they cut all twenty eight of their on staff photojournalist, replacing them with iPhone wielding reporters in 2013 (para 13). As technology continues to advance, the demand for professional photographers may dwindle, but the significance behind photography will never
Jerry Uelsmann has impacted society culturally and ethnically with his surreal engineering photography. His personal beliefs and surrealistic perspective defined his photography. He bases his creative process and how he engineers his photographs around his philosophy and morals. He used many techniques that challenged his will to work so extensively because of the complexity of his photographs, and paved the way for surrealistic photography in the present. Jerry Uelsmann’s photography surpasses the state of reality so much it looks perfectly photo shopped, but his photography took place decades before Photoshop. He is a photographer who pioneered the art of multi layered imagery years ahead of anyone else. He uses only his own negatives from the pictures that he shoots, and he says that he does this often without a specific composition in mind. Uelsmann was born in Detroit, Michigan on June 11th 1934. Jerry is best known for his in black and white images that he layered skillfully without the use of Photoshop. His photographs combine several negatives to create his landscapes that mix images of trees, rocks, water and human figures in new and sometimes unexpected ways. He has impacted society culturally and ethnically with his surreal engineering in photography. Through Jerry Uelsmann's inspiration and creative process he assembles elements of pictures together, rather than just taking a normal photograph to make a profound and thought provoking photography. His personal beliefs and surrealistic perspective defined his photography. He always based his creative process and how he engineers his photographs around his philosophy and morals. Jerry Uelsmann paved the way for surrealistic photography in the present, impacting society ...
Wes Kroninger is a photographer for his own photography studio Portraits By Wes and Wes Kroninger Photography. His studio is in uptown Westerville, Ohio where he has been working with salons and stylists for 5 years. He has been all over the country taking photos for clients and for himself. He has experience photographing advertising campaigns, competition entries and in-store collections for salons across the country and is comfortable working with stylist teams of all skill levels.
Consequences of Photography with the Rise of Camera Phones Susan Sontag argues in her piece On Photography written in 1977 that photography brought about a new era of mentality that “looks at the world as a set of potential photographs” (7). The advances in technology like the camera-phone, that made cameras both easily portable and easily affordable had unexpected consequences, and with even further technological developments such as camera phones, these consequences are heightened. Not only does the increase in camera accessibility cause an alienation or isolation from a photographer’s subjects, but this alienation is considerably more prevalent and damaging in situations like vacations where the photographer is supposed to be having fun. Karl Marx describes alienation in his chapter “Estranged Labor” in The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 as a loss of self which was heightened with capitalism. In capitalism, people started getting paid for their time and stopped making complete products.
Robert Draper, a professional journalist and nonfiction writer, as well as a contributor to The New York Times Magazine, once stated, “Photographers use their cameras as tools of exploration, passports to inner sanctums, instruments for change” (“Draper”). As we all know, digital single-lens reflex cameras, better known as DSLRs, are being replaced over time with a variety of various modern smartphone cameras as they are becoming the new standard of photographic convenience and affordability among ordinary, everyday camera users. However, the simple convenience of smartphones can also be a strong shortcoming when it comes to photography as it forces manufacturers to fabricate products that are capable of far less than a professional camera,
Both Niécpe’s and Daguerre’s cameras took pictures on metal plates. In the same year Daguerre made his camera, an Englishman by the name of William Henry Fox Talbot made the first camera that photographed pictures on paper. The camera printed a reverse picture onto a negative and chemicals were needed to produce the photo up right. In 1861, color film came along and pictures were produced with color instead of being just black and white. James Clerk Maxwell is credited with coming up with color film, after he took the same picture three times, using a different color ribbon....
(Jenny Carew 1981). This essay discusses three major points in relation to past, present and future of photography. The first point is how the history of photographs developed people’s own perception of the world. Next, it will explain the image as modern, how they are important
Leica invented the first still camera to use a 35mm film in 1925 while another German company introduced the first single-lens reflex camera in 1949. Nikon and Canon would come to make the interchangeable lens popular and the built-in light meter commonplace. The heart of digital devices as well as the roots of digital photography came to be at Bell Labs in 1969 when the development of the first charged-couple device (CCD) came about. The CCD is the piece that converts light to an electronic signal. By the time the mid-1980’s came around, several companies were working on digital cameras.
The first digital camera was invented in 1974 by a man named Steven Sasson, a research engineer who worked for Eastman Kodak. Sasson was asked by a supervisor to look at a charge-coupled device in order to see if it could be used as a sensor for a camera. It took Sasson about a year of researching before he discovered that an image captured by a camera could be converted into an electronic signal and stored onto digital memory (Bakker; Esser 45). The president of Kodak, Philip Faraci, said to the New York Times, “”The technology was half-baked, but it was a real breakthrough”” (New York Times 2). The first prototype converted light to numbers and stored them on a digital cassette tape....
People always want to keep the prefect moments in their lives. So they invented cameras that the earliest invention which can help people to do that. Nowadays cameras have become a part of people¡¯s lives. Most of families own at least one camera. Wherever there is a party, a picnic, a wedding or something else, we use a camera to save the memories. With the development of technology, there is a new kind of camera which becomes a fashion all over the word. It named digital camera which is short for DC. Digital cameras are different form the traditional cameras. The biggest differentiation between the two cameras are digital cameras do not need films whilst tradition camera need. Compare with tradition camera, digital camera has more advantages for ordinary consumer than disadvantages. But people use the tradition cameras for more than 150 years, will they easily to accept the new camera? How to motivate consumer to buy digital cameras? Can the marketers create such a need to them? For this article, I would discuss the need and motivation of consumers, and show the answer about the questions above.
If history is any example, then the acceptance of digital media art will be slow. Vincent Van Gogh was considered such a poor artist that he could not sell a painting in his lifetime. The Impressionists in general were laughed at and considered to be untalented artists and refused admission in the important galleries and exhibition of their times. Now these artworks sell for millions and are treasured in many museums. Photography has taken 150 years to achieve respectability in the fine art field. This art form faced many of the same problems as digital media art, ease of reproduction, use of new technology, and seeming lack of skill. With art, sometimes only time can tell what will be truly treasured by the next generations.
Photojournalism is a specific form of journalism that employs the use of images to form a news story that meaningfully contributes to the media. This allows a photographer to capture stills that tell the story of a moment in time. Photojournalism creates a transparency between the media and the people as it depicts an accurate representation where meaning can be misinterpreted through text. Photojournalism largely contributes to the way we understand the reality of a moment. Becker (1982) supports this concept as he compares photography to paintings. He says that paintings get their meaning from the painters, collectors, critics, and curators; therefore photographs get their meaning from the way people understand them and use them. Photojournalist’s
Kodak is the world’s foremost imaging innovator. George Eastman put the first simple camera into the hands of a world of consumers in 1888. In so doing, he made a cumbersome and complicated process easy to use and accessible to nearly everyone. Since that time, the Eastman Kodak Company has led the way with an abundance of new products and processes to make photography simpler, more useful and more enjoyable. With sales of $13.3 billion in 2006, the company is committed to a digitally oriented growth strategy focused on helping people better use meaningful images and information in their life and work. (Kodak, 2007)
Why is this topic of interest important? It has been suggested and viewed that print media is on the decline while digital media is on the rise - which leads to a possible assumption that digital media is a better medium and print may eventually be replaced someday. To address these conflicting views, the aid of relevant sources will help us find out the reasons why print media is on the decline and digital media on the rise, the advantages of print media as compared to digital media and the demographic differences between users of print and digital media respectively. All these questions will be answered in the following literature review.
Camera History.The first camera like devices can be seen as far back as Ancient Greece and China. This piece of early technology was called the Obscura, the invention of this was an important part in developing cameras and photography. A camera Obscura is a dark closed space that is shaped like a box with a hole on the other side of it. The light that comes through the tiny hole projects an image that meets the wall of the box. The image was then drawn by an artist; however, the image was projected upside down.
Photography has created an outlet for the masses to story tell. It has a way of speaking without words like most art forms and is a manner of expression in itself. To eradicate photography from humans would be equivalent to taking away a limb from humankind. Our society has grown an immense amount of dependency on it. Photography has become almost a daily menial task such as brushing your teeth; where we must take pictures of the things we deem important or equally unimportant, even more so with the invention of social media outlets such as Instagram and Snapchat, where photography is the main source of communication between people who use them. Susan Sontag offers the basis of what taking pictures can undertake in both our daily lives and moments that are not part of our daily lives, such as travel. Traveling to places where one is not accustomed can flare pent up anxiety. A way to subdue that anxiety could be through taking pictures, since it’s the only factor that we have total control over in a space where we don’t have much, or, any control of our surrounding environment. On the other hand, taking photos can also be a tool of power in the same sense as it allows for it to be a defense against anxiety. With the camera in our hands, we have the power to decide who, what, where, when, and why we take a picture. This in turn also gives the person who took the picture power over those who later analyze the photos, letting them decide the meaning of the photo individually, despite the intended or true meaning.