Steven Lukes Power: A Radical View

1053 Words3 Pages

Steven Lukes Power is seen as the ability to influence or can be seen to control the behavior of people. This power can either be distributed throughout a government or can be in the control of one person. Steven Lukes' book "Power: A Radical View" he acknowlegdes this as he argue that power is when you get someone to do something they would otherwise not normally do. He says that this can be exercised throught three main ways these are Power as decision making, Power as agenda setting and Power as thought control. Lukes' believed that Power in the form of decision-making also known as the open face of power, which is the ability to publicly make decisions was trust worthy as it gives trust in the government of that public as it shows …show more content…

This power involves the controling the context in which decisions are being made so you can then influence them decisions to either pass through a legistration or reject one. This power is seen as decisions being made behind closed doors where the public will not know who holds the power and do not know if that is there agenda. Due to in such contexts the power is not only held by elected officials but by the advisers and assistants who will be chosen who will try and push there own agenda as it be it through meeting which they set up to shape the agenda of the elected official. However it isn't always publicly elected officials who hold the power lobby groups such as the NRA have power in which they can use to set agendas or help out candidates who indorse them. This was seen in the 2010 midterm elections, where the NRA endorsed candidates in around about two-thirds of the congressional race which eighty percent of candidates won their seats, the NRA also rates these candidates through an A-F system for who they deam has a perfect record on gun rights which will aslo further there …show more content…

This has been seen through many way and why is rightfully also given the name as the "deceptive face of power" as it is there to change owns mind on a topic. This can be discrete or it can be place on the side of a bus. This power is usually use as a negative or fear inducing stratagy to get the public behind the idea of the party. This can be seen through slight nationalisation of Scotland in which the use of Scottish in front front of many services to make people more question why they are controlled by a government outside of there country, as well as give people the feeling that they are seen as a lower class and that the Scottish Parliment is the voice of them give them faith and increases the support towards the Scottish Parliment this is seen as more discrete compaired to other approches. For example by compairing this to the Brexit campagne where It claimed that "we send the EU £350 million a weak let's fund our NHS instead" which made people vote to leave as it would have most benifited the over all national health of the country which altered there dicision and made people believe that it would be true. With this also being on public transport it would have also ended up making people believe that this was true, further changing there view of the

Open Document