Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The concept of power
The three faces of power
Essays on theories of power
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The concept of power
Paradoxes of Power in Sociological Insight by Randall Collins
It may be said that the institution of power has always been a prevalent force in our
society. It is a large part of what holds society together; without it civilized society as we know it
would not exist. The functions of power range from keeping crime at bay to the more
commonplace aspects such as allowing patrons to be served in a restaurant. The notion of power
is almost invisible until further analyzed; it is something that we perceive as being simple
and therefore take for granted. Yet there are so many intricacies in regard to power that still
remain to be seen. In Chapter Three of Sociological Insight by Randall Collins, the author
establishes some valid points concerning power. He posits that power is something of a self-
contradiction, that it is often most effective when subtly exercised. Collins also delves into the
various forms that power may take, such as money and coercion, which are negated as valid forms
of power. Lastly, the importance of implicit principles and understandings is emphasized, also
illustrating that power is most firmly established in the realms of both certainty and uncertainty.
In accordance with the title of Chapter Three, Paradoxes of Power, Collins' main point is
that power is truly a contradiction; the word itself evokes images of monarchs and times long
gone by. But in the present day and an era marked by the rise of democracy, power has little to
do with such institutions; rather it something that is exercised on high levels as well as lower ones.
Although it is something not often thought about, power is everywhere. It is evident in the legal
...
... middle of paper ...
...ercion are proven to be
inefficient forms of power.
In analyzing the institution of power so closely, the author has brought to light a multiple
of viewpoints on power in its many forms. Perhaps he wishes to break down the components of
power in order for it to be seen in a simpler light and to emphasize the egalitarian nature of
humanity in spite of social classifications, by elucidating the fact that power is something that can
be learned.
What I have gathered from this analysis is mainly the duality of power. It is at times both
complex and startlingly basic, due to the fact that, with the exclusion of philosophers, it is not
something often meditated upon. I have come away from this reading with the knowledge that
power is not based solely upon always having the upper hand, but rather it is knowing when to
concede.
What is power to a human? As time has gone by, there have been many forms of control and influence in the world. Many strive to achieve total rule over a society or group of individuals. Yet the question still presents itself to the average man. Why does man desire power so greatly even though there is visible trouble that follows? Shelley’s Frankenstein, Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron”, and Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, whether through the situation or the character themselves, depict the evils and hardships due to an imbalance and poor management of power.
Power is held and exerted or ignored by those with the ability to act upon other people or cause an event. The scientific community held power over hospitals, scientists, and scientific progress because it can deem work valid, scientific, ethical, and otherwise. John Hopkins held power over its patients not only because they were under its care, but also because many could not pay for medical care. Individual doctors at Hopkins held power over their specific patients for the same reasons although they held more extensive powers over the specific patient. Henrietta held power over whether or not she received treatment. Zakariyya held power over the boy he murdered because he h...
Power simply can be defined as control over resources. This control allows for individuals to bring about change. The influence of power typically has a negative impact on individuals. It has even been said that “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Typically, as an individual gains power they tend to be less inhibited and act more based on their personal desires disregarding what is ethically right. Oftentimes, individuals lose sight of their morals in attempts to gain more power and exploit other people. Indeed, it is true that “with great power comes great responsibility” and whether an individual lets that responsibility corrupt them is a strong measure of their personal character (Ferguson and Peterson,
with power have the resources to influence the creation and termination of law, both on
The classical thinking believe that authority can be achieved through self-interest, fear and habit. However, this thinking has been moved away by
Raven, Bertram, and John French. Jr. "Legitimate Power, Coercive Power, and Observability in Social Influence ." Sociometry Vol. 21.No. 2 (1958): 83. Web. 2 Aug 2010. .
power as occurring in a situation where "A has power over B to the extent he can
They are not only its inert or consenting target; they are always also the elements of its articulation” (Foucault, “Two Lectures” 34). Power may take various forms, all of which are employed and exercised by individualsand unto individuals in the institutions of society. In all institutions, there is political and judicial power, as certain individuals claim the right to give orders, establish rules, and so forth as well as the right to punish and award. For example, in school, the professor not only teaches, but also dictates, evaluates, as well as punishes and rewards.
There are several sources of power, some of them are authority, reward, expertise, and coercion.
In the video Eric Liu spoke of the systems of power that society has structured. Eric defines power as the ability to make others do what you would have them do. He sees power as being found with family, at your workplace, and in relationships. He defines the six main sources of civic power as being Control of physical force, wealth to buy results and other power, State action (government) to have control over people and what they do. An example for this would be that in a democracy the citizens give government power through elections, and in contrast dictatorship expresses power through force. The fourth civic power is known as social norm, which means what others believe that is okay, and what is not okay. The fifth civic power is ideas meaning
The idea of power has changed since then as well, with power relying on many different aspects and not as a mercantilist view of the 16th 17th 18th and 19th century, and therefore could be weighed with different forms of exertion of power such as the modern day economy, or military, or even soft power politics.
in this purpose is a key to Mach’s view of power. Because it was written for the use of one man
Some theorists believe that ‘power is everywhere: not because it embraces everything, but because it comes from everywhere… power is not an institution, nor a structure, nor possession. It is the name we give to a complex strategic situation in a particular society. (Foucault, 1990: 93) This is because power is present in each individual and in every relationship. It is defined as the ability of a group to get another group to take some form of desired action, usually by consensual power and sometimes by force. (Holmes, Hughes &Julian, 2007) There have been a number of differing views on ‘power over’ the many years in which it has been studied. Theorist such as Anthony Gidden in his works on structuration theory attempts to integrate basic structural analyses and agency-centred traditions. According to this, people are free to act, but they must also use and replicate fundamental structures of power by and through their own actions. Power is wielded and maintained by how one ‘makes a difference’ and based on their decisions and actions, if one fails to exercise power, that is to ‘make a difference’ then power is lost. (Giddens: 1984: 14) However, more recent theorists have revisited older conceptions including the power one has over another and within the decision-making processes, and power, as the ability to set specific, wanted agendas. To put it simply, power is the ability to get others to do something they wouldn’t otherwise do. In the political arena, therefore, power is the ability to make or influence decisions that other people are bound by.
According to the paper presented, I believe that power is the most essential element for the human progress, since it’s about changing intentions to actions. In organization it’s about sharing information, about working together and running the company in the best interest of everyone. According to my learning, I believed that it changes nothing, no one can predict the result of a decision and we spend more time living with the consequence of our decision than making them. In turn we should focus on getting things done rather than thinking of the consequence.
Power is defined in the course study notes as the “ability of individuals or groups to get what they want despite the opposition”. Power is derived from a variety of sources including knowledge, experience and environmental uncertainties (Denhardt et al, 2001). It is also important to recognize that power is specific to each situation. Individuals or groups that may be entirely powerful in one situation may find themselves with little or no power in another. The county Registrar of Voters, who is my boss, is a perfect example. In running the local elections office, she can exercise the ultimate power. However, in a situation where she attempted to get the county selected for a desirable, statewide pilot project, she was powerless, completely at the mercy of the Secretary of State. Power is difficult to measure and even to recognize, yet it plays a major role in explaining authority. In organizations, power is most likely exercised in situations where “the stakes are high, resources are limited, and goals and processes are unclear” (Denhardt et al, 2001). The absence of power in organizations forces us to rely on soley hierarchical authority.