Statue Of Gudea Analysis

Around the world, people have been searching for and experimenting with different ways to express themselves. One of the most diverse ways takes place in the form of art. Art is comprised of many different categories and sub-categories, but all of them sending the same message: expression. As long as a piece is created from emotion, beliefs, and influence, it can be considered “art”. One of the forms of art that takes on a 3-dimensional affect is the sculpture. Sculptures are one of the earliest forms of art, right next to its 2-dimensional “cousin”, Drawings. Two specific sculptures that take place in the B.C. era are “Memi&Sabu” and “Statue of Gudea”. When comparing the two, one will find very few similarities. One of those similarities is the obvious: they are of actual people who once lived in the times they were carved. If looked at closely, it can be

Another similarity between the sculptures that they exude peace and positivity. All the facial expressions in the pieces are content and of positive nature. Using the “Statue of Gudea” as an example, the influence of serenity that the Neo-Sumerian culture used when producing works of art is visible, as compared to the Akkadian Period. One addition to the pieces that is often a constant staple in sculpture carving is inscriptions. Both the inscriptions serve as identifiers for what the pieces are. As far as differences between the two sculptures go, there is quite an abundance. Firstly, they are from different time periods. While the “Memi&Sabu” sculpture was carved in 2575-2465 B.C. (Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, 1948), the “Statue of Gudea” was crafted in 2150-2100 B.C. (Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, 1959). Place