Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of speech act
The function of speech act
Applying speech acts theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of speech act
1We employ different speech acts (viz. greeting, apology, request, complaint, invitation, compliment, and refusal) in our daily communication and most of the situations. Among the speech acts we utilize, apology is one of the most frequently employed speech acts. An apology is defined as “a speech act which is intended to provide support for the hearer who was actually or potentially malaffected by a violation” (Olshtain,1989:156–157). AB Some speech acts are face threatening acts (FTAs) because they are threats to the face of a speaker or hearer or impose constraints on the speaker’s or hearer’s freedom of action. D An apology is a face-saving act for the hearer and a face-threatening act for the speaker because he/she is inclined to humble him-/herself and admit responsibility. AB Edmondson, House, Kasper, and Stemmer (1984: 121) perceive apology as an …show more content…
These strategies minimize the degree of offence to the offended and establish rapport between the parties. Different scholars have proposed different apology strategy classifications which often overlap. G Trosborg (1987: 150-152) presents the following strategies: 1. minimizing the degree of offense either by insisting that the alleged injury is not very serious, or by discussion preconditions of the complaint. Finally, the offender may blame someone else for the offense; 2. acknowledgment of responsibility in which the offender accepts responsibility implicitly or explicitly with different levels of self-blame in ascending order of the degree with which the offender accepts the blame: implicit acknowledgment; explicit acknowledgment; expression of lack of intent; expression of self-deficiency; expression of embarrassment; and explicit acceptance of the blame; 3. explanation or account by the offender to alleviate his/her guilt by giving an implicit or explicit explanation or account of the
Accept a period of reflection where the incident is considered and a means of reparation is decided upon.
Stevens, Mark. (2000). Victim Impact Statements Considered in Sentencing. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 2(1), 3. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1071&context=bjcl
This is often done through the use of language to direct focus away from the perpetrator of assault; in addition to accrediting rape to the victim, attributions of rape blame may be related to variables such as alcohol consumption, verbal and non-verbal miscommunication of sexual signals, and resistance (or lack thereof) used at the time of a sexual assault. This has the effect of complicating sexual assault analyses and blurring issues surrounding assault. For example, alcohol complicates discussions of consent and censure in rape trials; alcohol consumption by the perpetrator has a pardoning effect. Intoxicated perpetrators are held less responsible for their actions than sober perpetrators (Abbey et al., 2004). In this sense, perpetrators of sexual assault are able to “blame [their assault] on the a-a-alcohol”. Conversely, women who are sexually assaulted after having consumed alcohol are assessed from a victim-blaming perspective – a perspective that suggests that the woman caused her rape by suggesting her consent through her alcohol consumption (leading the man on). In
….Where the conduct of the accused induces in the victim a well-founded apprehension of physical harm such as to make it a natural consequence that the victim would seek to escape and the victim was
McCarthy, A. (n.d.). 10 rules of negotiation. Negotiation Skills. Retrieved March 31, 2014, from http://www.negotiation-skills.org
Hocker & Wilmot, 2007, Poole, & Stutman, 2005 Folger and 2007 Cahn& Abigail. "Interpersonal Conflict and Conflict Management." Devito, Joseph A. The Interpersonal Communication Book. Boston: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon, 2009. 276.
Abigail, R. A., & Cahn, D. D. (2011). Managing conflict through communication. 4th Ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
For example, Meyerhoff describes the use of an honorific form of a word as a demonstration of respect by the speaker towards the person with whom they are speaking (85). In order to collect data, researchers may analyze audio recordings, observe social interactions, or review transcriptions. Meyerhoff provides the example of a trascribed exchange in Japanese in which a student and a professor both elect to use the honorific forms in their conversation. When speaking in Japanese, “speakers have to be very discerning: they have to be sensitive to the social significance of the relationships and settings they find themselves in and be able to appropriately draw on the conventions for use of honorifics in those settings” (85). Although this is the specific methodology in Japanese politeness, other languages may hold an identical
One important issue in studying communication is to learn how individuals manage to open conversations or how people may address one another in a given language (Aliakbari & Toni, 2008). Oyetade (1995) defines address terms as words or expressions used in interactive and face-to-face situations to designate the person being talked to. Address terms in different speech communities are worthy of study, address terms seem to be influenced by culture (Fitch, 1991; Morford, 1997).
This theory has been subject to many articles and studies in the communication and social departments. Indeed, studying this theory can help us understanding human relations in interpersonal communication. Each of us has been one day confronted to uncertainty, whereas in initial encounters, or moving to a new a new place, or beginning a new work.
Conflicts and disputes are one of the major aspects in society that need to be dealt with on a regular basis. When these conflicts and disputes arise in the workforce, at home, in an institute, or/and in public, there needs to be some form of resolution in order to resolve and maintain a peaceful environment. Conflicts are a part of a healthy relationship, however at times, these conflicts need to be resolved using a conflict resolution process. Although there are several processes that can be used to solve conflicts, mediation and advocacy are two of the most common conflict resolution processes that can be utilized to come to a harmonious conclusion or resolution. Even though mediation and advocacy may seem to fall under the same category, these two are individually and specifically used for certain problematic scenarios as they both uniquely utilize distinctive skills and steps.
Considered to be the most influential, Jakobson and Hymes' theory has always been used as the basis for future theories on the functions of language. Whilst linguists have sought to understand how, as speakers, people are able to produce an infinite number of sentences out of a finite set of rules, philosophers have tried to explain how an infinite number of sentences may reflect a finite set of functions. These theories based on language in use belong to the field of pragmatics and the most relevant one on this issue is the so-called 'Speech Act Theory', a proposal by Austin and Searle. These philosophers argued that, since the number of things people do with words is limited, people should be able to assign different functions to different
Victim blaming refers to the victim being held responsible for the acts committed against them. Much of victim blaming stems from the traditional ideologies of gender, where women are perceived as inferior to men. These underlying views contribute to sexual assault cases involving female victims and male perpetrators, where the fault lies with the victim. The recent case involving a Stanford student, Brock Turner, who sexually assaulted an unconscious woman, Emily Doe, brought about much public controversy. Though Brock had clear motives for his actions and there was physical proof that he was at fault, allegations against the victim were constantly made. In the trial statement the victim writes, “I was told he hired a powerful attorney, expert witnesses, private investigators who were going to try and find details about my personal
As men and women are socialized differently, females tend to express politeness more than men. One common facilitative device is ...
The researcher explore the important joint effects of components on the perception of the appropriateness of an account by demonstrating it in a different scenario. The first is asking for a pardon which may be a necessary element of apology. According to Goffman, appropriate apology consists of seven elements: the expression of concern for the victims suffering, the acknowledgment of the rule being violated, the approval of sanctions, the non approval of one’s own behavior, the dissociation from the misdeed, the affirmation of obeying the rule in the future, and the offer and compensation for the deed.