Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A reflection essay about forgiveness
A reflection essay about forgiveness
A reflection essay about forgiveness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A reflection essay about forgiveness
Forgiveness is the intentional and voluntary process by which a victim undergoes a change in feelings and attitude regarding an offense. It is also the discarding of negative emotions, such as revenge, with an increased ability to wish the offender well. In this study, the researcher explored how justification and apologies have to be phrased and framed to render them acceptable to the victims.
The researcher explore the important joint effects of components on the perception of the appropriateness of an account by demonstrating it in a different scenario. The first is asking for a pardon which may be a necessary element of apology. According to Goffman, appropriate apology consists of seven elements: the expression of concern for the victims suffering, the acknowledgment of the rule being violated, the approval of sanctions, the non approval of one’s own behavior, the dissociation from the misdeed, the affirmation of obeying the rule in the future, and the offer and compensation for the deed.
Second, expressing self-reproach and offering compensation may have main effects on forgiveness, but when provided together, they could have conditions such that the total effect is greater than the sum of the individual sum.
Third, asking for pardon without offering compensation may be interpreted by the victim as insincere. For example, when the child has done wrong to his parents, the child will apologize. For him to learn his lesson, he must undergo punishment, thus, he will not repeat his mistake. Darby Schlenker suggests that admitting fault, admitting damage, expressing remorse, asking pardon, and offering compensation are the five components significant for making an account appear sincere, convincing and effective.
The first speci...
... middle of paper ...
...rticipants feel that the harm-doer has not admitted fault explicitly, compensation is less likely to be recognized, hence producing a higher negative outcome. When the harm-doer as admitting damage the negative affect is less intense same as perceiving apology nor compensation.
Personality variables did not change, however, interaction effects were entered as additional predictors. The trait anger and interpersonal trust influences subjective account components. The researcher infer that the relationship of the victim to the harm-doer is clearly altered, especially when a harm-doer is a friend or a love one. It is said that the trust of the victim in the person who hurt him changes. The personality did not operate as a mediator of the objective account component. Rather, the effect of both variables on subjective account components were independent from each other.
Forgiveness is crucial for a clear conscience and peace of mind for the both of them. However, all of this is arguable by the fact that today’s experiences are incomparable to those of Hitler’s times. One cannot begin to place one in each other’s shoes and know exactly how to respond to the events happening. One can only guess how they would respond, but until they are in that moment, all plausible reasoning can change. Nevertheless, forgiveness continues to be an aspect of everyday life in every century.
The essay "Forgiveness," written by June Callwood, explores the concept of forgiving and how it influences people's lives for the better. Her work describes many components of forgiveness, such as how difficult it can be to come to terms with, why it is such a crucial part of humanity, and how it affects all people. Her essay aims to prove that forgiveness is the key to living peacefully and explains specific examples of people who have encountered extremely difficult situations in their lives- all of whom found it within themselves to forgive. To clearly portray this message in her writing, Callwood uses several strategies. She includes fear inducing statistics, makes many references to famous events and leaders, and uses a serious convincing tone, all of which are very effective.
Accept a period of reflection where the incident is considered and a means of reparation is decided upon.
Forgiveness and justice are very similar than we believe them to be. We believe that justice is
When one does wrong, the common reaction is to hide it and pretend as if nothing happened. Because of the human conscience it is difficult to completely forget about a wrongdoing. Through our conscience guilt is built up and eventually that guilt shatters enough barriers and in turn causes the doer to admit his/her wrong.
The best revenge is your success, happiness, and the triumph of not giving vindictive people any dominion over your peace of mind. Forgiveness refers to the actor not the act. Not to the offense but the woundedness of the offender. You’re not excusing the behavior or returning to it, but grasping how emotionally crippled he or she is, a huge stretch of compassion, but the path to freedom. Forgiveness does more for you than anyone else because it liberates you from negativity and lets you move forward. ”.
LeGuin, Ursula K. “Forgiveness Day.” Four Ways to Forgiveness. New York: HarperPaperbacks, 1995. Pp. 47-124.
Especially in political contexts, knowledge of basic facts is critical because often victims and the broader political community do now know who was responsible for the wrong suffered, nor the extent of violations committed. Acknowledgement refers to the official, public recognition of what happened. This is often needed to counter official denial of wrongdoing or responsibility for wrongdoing. The often unspoken, Freudian assumption is that suppressed traumas will inevitably re-emerge in destructive ways. The more explicit arguments are that the acknowledgement of wrongs and of victims helps heal psychic wounds (van Ness and Strong, 2002), enable re-establish normative standards for behavior , and reassert that the victims are indeed members of the moral or political community (Llewellyn and Howse,
Kelley’s (1998) analysis of forgiveness explains that there are three ways that individuals forgive: directly, indirectly, and conditionally. Direct forgiveness, i.e. “I forgive you,” is most often employed within a direct discussion about the transgression at hand. Indirect forgiveness occurs when the forgiver acts in such a way that implies forgiveness without explicitly sta...
"Ironically", Okimoto said, "people who refused to apologize ended up with boosted feelings of integrity." Even though the person may not want to apologize and correct his wrongdoings, it is the best thing to do and will make you feel better in the
Today, forgiveness is a slippery slope, and isolating the distinction between a pardon and forgiveness can be confusing, especially when the pardoning is public. Lately, forgiveness is doled out like candy in a parade. Though unearned and often underserved, it is given without any preemptive question or reasonable justification. Of course, there are those that might argue their forgiveness is in the spirit of their religion, their morals, and fairly enough, in the spirit of growth and healing; however, there are certain circumstances, such as those of the My Lai Massacre, where none of the above can justify forgiveness. In light of this, it was an egregious misjudgment and mistake by the United States Government to pardon the soldiers and officers
Public apologizes have been made over the years to make amends for historic injustice that was inflicted on victims of past wars and events. The purpose of these apologizes is to politically fix old wounds in history; however, some argues that public apologizes can sometimes create harm by re-victimizing or angering the victims and their descendants. Sandel though focused on another argument that states that people today cannot apologize and take responsibility, both financially and politically, for wrongdoings committed by their ancestors. This leads into the idea known as “moral individualism”, which states that people are only responsible for actions they voluntarily did as the actions of others are beyond their control. However, this lessens
Ristovski, A., & WERTHEIM, E. H. (2005). Investigation of compensation source, trait empathy, satisfaction with outcome and forgiveness in the criminal context. Australian Psychologist, 40(1), 63-69.
Apology opens the door to forgiveness by allowing us to have empathy for the wrongdoer.
Forgiveness is the act of releasing an offender of any wrong or hurt they may have caused you whether they deserve it or not. It is a decision to let go of resentment or vengeance toward a person or group of people. When we choose to forgive, we’re wiping the slate clean, cancelling a debt, or as I love to say, “Letting it go.” In the Bible, the Greek word for forgiveness literally means to “let it go.” This concept, “forgiveness,” is easier said than done. Majority of people find it very difficult to let go of offenses and hurts caused by others. I really do believe that most people desire to let it go, but we lack the knowledge of how to do it. As believers, we are instructed by God maintain an attitude of forgiveness.