Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sodium carbonate titration lab report
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sodium carbonate titration lab report
carbonate was weighed accurately and dissolved in distilled water in a 250 mL volumetric flask. The solution was then made up to the mark with distilled water and mixed thoroughly. Titration Procedure A burette was filled with the standard sodium carbonate solution. Using a pipette, a measured volume of hydrochloric acid was transferred into a conical flask. A few drops of methyl orange indicator were added to the hydrochloric acid solution. The burette was then slowly titrated with the sodium carbonate solution until the endpoint was reached, which was indicated by a colour change from pink to yellow. The volume of sodium carbonate solution used was recorded. This process was repeated three times to obtain an average volume of sodium carbonate solution used. RESULTS The average volume of sodium carbonate solution used was 24.5 mL. CALCULATIONS The concentration of hydrochloric acid was calculated using the formula: Concentration of HCl = Concentration of Na2CO3 x Volume of Na2CO3 / Volume of HCl The concentration of sodium carbonate was 0.1 M. The volume of sodium carbonate used was 24.5 mL. The volume of hydrochloric acid used was 25 mL. Therefore, the concentration of hydrochloric acid was 0.098 M. CONCLUSION The concentration of hydrochloric acid was determined to be 0.098 M using the process
This produces a 0.1 M difference from the expected value of 1.0 M. The discrepancy between the expected and actual values could potentially be caused by a few errors or misconducts. In this case, the use of solid sodium carbonate could contribute to an error because of its hygroscopic nature, which means it absorbs moisture from its surroundings, increasing its weight and affecting the calculations. Additionally, the volume of hydrochloric acid used to neutralize the sodium carbonate could be incorrect due to the possibility of overshooting, where a drop of hydrochloric acid accidentally drips into the sodium hydroxide after the endpoint has already been achieved. The result could also be changed due to contamination of the beaker or flask because of a failure to thoroughly rinse them. Therefore, older excess solutions could potentially mix with the hydrochloric acid or sodium carbonate, changing the volume, concentration, or product.
Random errors reflect a low precision through high scatter. Increasing the sample size of the number of tablets used will produce more data that can be graphed, and from which a more reliable and representative line of best fit could be produced, ultimately minimising random errors. Additionally, increasing the number of trials for each number of reacting Alka Seltzer tablets would minimise random errors by helping to produce a more precise average change in mass. Modifying the method can also help minimise the effect of random errors, by obtaining more reliable results. For example, instead of cutting the Alka Seltzer tablets in half, whole Alka Seltzer tablets could have been used, and the amount of reacting HCl could have been increased to account for the increase in the number of tablets used for each ample. In doing this, the mass of the reacting Alka Seltzer tablets will be more consistent for each trial, and the state of subdivision of the tablets could be truly kept
This lab contains two different procedures to titrating vinegar. One procedure uses phenolphthalein while the other uses a pH meter. Bothe procedures can be found on “An Analysis of a Household Acid: Titrating Vinegar” by the Department of Chemistry at APSU.
In this experiment, there were several objectives. First, this lab was designed to determine the difference, if any, between the densities of Coke and Diet Coke. It was designed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of several lab equipment measurements. This lab was also designed to be an introduction to the LabQuest Data and the Logger Pro data analysis database. Random, systematic, and gross errors are errors made during experiments that can have significant effects to the results. Random errors do not really have a specific cause, but still causes a few of the measurements to either be a little high or a little low. Systematic errors occur when there are limitations or mistakes on lab equipment or lab procedures. These kinds of errors cause measurements to be either be always high or always low. The last kind of error is gross errors. Gross errors occur when machines or equipment fail completely. However, gross errors usually occur due to a personal mistake. For this experiment, the number of significant figures is very important and depends on the equipment being used. When using the volumetric pipette and burette, the measurements are rounded to the hundredth place while in a graduated cylinder, it is rounded to the tenth place.
We were then to make a base solution of 0.7 M NaOH. In order to standardize
Apparatus: * 1 measuring cylinder * 1 test tube * 1 stop clock * A large gelatine cube containing indicator and NaOH * Hydrochloric acid ranging from 1-3 molars * A scalpel Diagram: Method: * Take the large gelatine cube and cut into 15 equal pieces * Place on piece of the cube into the test tube * Measure out 10mls of HCl in the measuring cylinder * Pour the HCl into the test tube with the gelatine cube and start the clock * Time how long it takes for the pink colour inside the gelatine cube to completely disappear * You will also notice that the cube dissolves slightly * Record your results and repeat this same process 3 times for each molar of acid: § 1 molar § 1.5 molar § 2 molar
The amount of hydrochloric acid. 3. The concentration of the hydrochloric acid. 4. The surface area of the calcium carbonate.
One possible source of experimental error could be not having a solid measurement of magnesium hydroxide nor citric acid. This is because we were told to measure out between 5.6g-5.8g for magnesium hydroxide and 14g-21g for citric acid. If accuracy measures how closely a measured value is to the accepted value and or true value, then accuracy may not have been an aspect that was achieved in this lab. Therefore, not having a solid precise measurement and accurate measurement was another source of experimental error.
Compared to the 0.5 M hydrochloric acid that was less concentrated, the more concentrated 2 M hydrochloric acid c...
The same procedure was done using 10ml of CV and 20ml of sodium hydroxide, both separately diluted to 50ml and added in a large beaker. The absorbance was recorded. In the last trial, 10ml of CV, 10ml of NaOH were diluted to 50ml. Before adding the two mixtures, 1ml of soap was added to the NaOH solution and then poured into a large beaker, along with the CV. Absorbance was recorded and the materials
Firstly, we need to keep the chemical at a constant concentration. So, in this experiment we have chosen to keep hydrochloric acid at a constant concentration (5cm3). We could have, however, used Sodium Thiosulphate as a constant, but we had chosen to use Hydrochloric acid. Next, we must make sure that the solution is kept at a constant volume throughout the experiment. If the volume is different, then it could give different results if it was at a constant volume.
second test tube also add 6 mL of 0.1M HCl. Make a solution of 0.165
6. I then rinsed out the beaker and glass rod into the flask to make
Investigating How the Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid Affects the Rate of Reaction with Calcium Carbonate
In this experiment three different equations were used and they are the Stoichiometry of Titration Reaction, Converting mL to L, and Calculating the Molarity of NaOH and HCl (Lab Guide pg. 142 and 143).
There is also the potential of human error within this experiment for example finding the meniscus is important to get an accurate amount using the graduated pipettes and burettes. There is a possibility that at one point in the experiment a chemical was measured inaccurately affecting the results. To resolve this, the experiment should have been repeated three times.