Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of religion as a social institution
The role of religion in societies
The relationship between social and religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of religion as a social institution
Social psychology provides several explanations for the way people view economic inequality and how they react to the large disparities between the rich and the poor. One of the most prominent theories on economic inequality is the social dominance theory. The social dominance theory as explained by Felicia Pratto is a theory of intergroup relations that focuses on the maintenance of group-based social hierarchies. According to the social dominance theory, it does not matter what the form of government is, belief systems or the economic and social arrangements, societies organize based on group hierarchies. Group-based social hierarchies favor dominant groups in society over subordinate groups, leaving those in dominant groups with positive …show more content…
Among these legitimising myths falls two subcategories; they are hierarchy enhancing and hierarchy attenuating. A hierarchy enhancing myth refers to ideas such as racism, sexism, stereotypes and Manifest Destiny and typically leads to great levels of group-based inequalities. Whereas the hierarchy-attenuating myth refers to political doctrines such as feminism, communism, socialism and social democracy, which tend to lead to greater group-based equality. Hierarchy enhancing is also used when explaining institutional discrimination. Institutional discrimination explains inequality because institutions have more funds and resources. Institutions also have a larger reach, discrimination of one institution leads to discrimination throughout generations of that institution and institutions have their own internal norms. Due to hierarchy-enhancing, institutions are influenced and tend to favor the more affluent groups over the subordinate groups. Individual discrimination is also a part of the social dominance theory, because people who fall within the more affluent groups have more resources to allocate to individuals than those of the lower more subordinate classes therefore those who are more affluent tend to have more power, leading to a great increase
Many minority groups describe racism and other forms of discrimination as being more than just prejudiced towards people based on certain characteristics. Prejudice plays a large role in what is considered to be racism, but it also consists of having a dominant position in society and power to institute and take advantage of their racism. This dominant group of people have the most power, the greatest privileges, and what’s considered to be the highest social status. They use their power to provide themselves with (easier) access to resources like housing, education, jobs, food, health, legal protection, and et cetera. On the other hand, the subordinate group of people are singled out for unequal treatment and are regarded as “objects” of collective discrimination. They are provided with inferior education, food, jobs, healthcare and et cetera.
The Standard Oil Company is primarily an example of the dominance theory. This is because the Standard Oil Company ultimately abused its power essentially every step of the way to becoming a
Next, Institutional or systemic racism refers to the laws, policies, practices, rules and procedures that operate within organisations, societal structures and the broader community to the advantage of the dominant group or groups and to the detriment and disadvantage of other groups. Institutional racism may be intentional or unintentional. Jim Crowe is a great example of institutional racism. Jim Crow laws were the name of the racist caste system put in place to segregate African Americans, Hispanics and any ethnic minority. Theses laws made it so non whites could not integrate with minorities. These laws applied to hospitals, buses, toilets and drinking fountains and restaurants. For example Buses: All passenger stations in this state operated
The book “Defining Contested Concepts” does a swell job of explaining that race, class, gender, and sexuality are systems of oppression and are often contested within our society. The author, Lynn Weber (2010) argues that oppression through these titles exist within our every day interactions and that bigger powers in our political, economic and ideological make it possible for greater divisions between groups of people. These powers make the rules that give some people more privilege than others. Weber describes that there are four patterns of social relationships that are advocates oppression. These segregations are all controlled by the bigger powers, being characteristics that give affected individuals an unfair disadvantage to various interrelated aspects in their lives.
Manza, Jeff and Michael Sauder. 2009. Inequality and Society: Social Science Perspectives on Social Stratification. New York: Norton.
There are two groups of people, those that belong to the dominant group and those that belong to the subordinate group. Placement of this group can either be temporary or permanent depending on the social context. Temporary Inequality mainly takes into consideration status or power, defined as the relationship of dominance with age or profession. The superior in this case has the quality to impart on the lesser party. The lesser party however retains equal worth as the superior party and equality is developed between both parties. While Permanent Inequality is ALL about status and power. In this group there is firm difference between the worth of the dominant group and the subordinate groups. Dominants groups play their part by influencing and promoting negative associations with the subordinates. Dominant label subordinates as ineffective or incapable as a way to justify barring opportunities for all people. In some cases subordinates will respond to this with internalized oppression. In a system like this subordinates often develop skills and adapt to the ways of the dominant groups, often learning more about the dominant class than vice versa. Even though, many experts in the fields of “subordinate groups” derive from the dominant groups.
In American, there is a big problem that is racial discrimination. Because the long-standing institutionalized discrimination results in this problem. So what is institutionalized discrimination? How has discrimination become institutionalized for various ethnic subpopulations in the United States?
Because of their simultaneity in people's lives we advocate using the approach of a "matrix of domination" to analyze race, class, and gender as different but interrelated axes of social structure. A matrix of domination posits multiple, interlocking levels of domination that stem from the societal configuration of race, class,and gender relations. This structural pattern affects individual consciousness, group interaction, and group access to institutional power and privileges (Collins 1990).
Society is constantly undergoing change as a result of competition over scarce resources. According to conflict theory, inequality exists because those that have more control have a disproportionate share of society’s resources and actively defend their advantages. This would be considered as the upper class and the lower class. For example, when working at a clothing store, one will immediately notice the inequality between a sales associate and the head manager. A sales associate has to overcome many obstacles for a low salary. For example, a sales associate has to help everyone in the store for long periods of time and late at night, while struggling with many other different tasks. The head manager can sit in the back of the store, and get paid twice as much as the hard-working sales associate. This is a perfect comparison to society. This exploitation of the lower class by the upper class demonstrates how the upper class has more control and can use their control to their
The Sociological Explanations for Class Inequality There is much debate in sociology about whether class is still important. Many argue that class is no longer important as an individual's identity and life chances are based more status and cultural factors such as lifestyle, values, intelligence, education and the like, the post-modernists state that class has ceased to be the prime determinant of identity and suggest that societies are now organised around consumption rather than production, consequently people now identify themselves in terms of what they consume rather than in terms of social-class position. Class identity has therefore fragmented into numerous separate and individualised identities. Others argue that class is still a central influence on people's lives, that it affects their life chances (health, education, voting, social mobility etc.), they argue that class inequality exists and that such inequalities are widening rather than narrowing. Early theories such as Functionalist theory argue that inequality is functional for society since it makes sure that those who show the most potential talent are encouraged to develop this talent through higher education and training, with the promise of higher incomes when they qualify (deferred gratification).
Institutional Discrimination is a systematic discrimination carried out by social institutions that affects all members of a group who come into contact with it. There are structural disadvantage for the group based on their membership, and the discrimination that is embedded in the policies, rules, traditions, and beliefs. This applies to Freedom Summer by public institutions, like schools, government offices, churches, and more, discriminate against the African American population. The institutions would not allow African Americans the same rights to that institution like the Caucasians had. The acts of discrimination were based on the laws and beliefs that African Americans were the inferiority and that they did not deserve the same rights and privileges to those institutions as the Caucasians. Institutional discrimination was difficult to change easily because the Caucasians did not believe that African Americans should have the right to those institutions, like they had. The laws and policies would not change because the only people that had the power to change them where Caucasians, no African American had the
Institutional racism are those accepted, established, evident, respected forces, social arrangements, institutions, structures, policies, precedents and systems of social relations that operate are manipulated in such a way as to allow, support individual acts of racism. It is also to deprive certain racially identified categories within a society a chance to share, have equal access to, or have equal opportunity to acquire those things, material and nonmaterial, that are defined as desirable and necessary for rising in a hierarchical class society while that society is dependent, in part, upon that group they deprive for their labor and loyalty. Institutional racism is more subtle, less visible, and less identifiable, but no less destructive to human life and human dignity than individual acts of racism. Institutional racism deprives a racially identified group, usually defined as generally inferior to the defining dominant group, equal access to education, medical care, law, politics, housing, etc.1 Racism by domination of bigot whites has silenced a non-dominant group like African Americans in the past and continues to do so today with other non-dominant groups through institutionalized racism that suffers the hearts and minds of those targeted. There are three types of racism.
The conditions blacks are left in lead them to make the white prejudice even stronger and this cycle is what keeps the inequality consistent. The other one of this is that “employees have a taste for discrimination”. The third major theory is the structural discrimination and with this inequality is caused by the disadvantage in the social structure. The author also puts forth his own theory, which is internal colonialism. It says that the dominant group exploits the subordinate group for a gain.
A major limitation that has cost numerous groups of people their basic rights, injustice, and even their lives remains a constant struggle to contain. Discrimination, a pestilence since the beginning of society, is the root of prejudice, preconceptions, and power disparities. To simplify the myriad that is discrimination, two types are constructed: de facto and de jure. De facto discrimination involves segregation in cultural, social, and economic factors. It tends to be very subtle and is engrained in societal structures.
It is noticed that rational choice theory is a neo-classical economic plan that gives a hypothetical clarification for how people make choices when confronted with decisions. Moreover, this theory contends that an individual decides how an individual will act by adjusting the expenses and advantages of their choices. Due to its elegant clarification, the RCT has been broadly connected to the investigation of individual, social, and monetary practices in numerous settings. Knapp and Ferrante (2012) stated that adopted a rational choice viewpoint in his financial way to deal with wrongdoing and contended that a criminal augments their expected benefit from an illegal movement in excess of the anticipated expense of discipline.