Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONISM essay
Strengths and weaknesses of social constructionism theory
Strengths and weaknesses of social constructionism theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONISM essay
Social constructionism is how we, as a society construct the world between language and ourselves. Most things are not taken as being in existence until agreed by society. Social constructionism is not concerned about how things exist in any such materialistic form but how we construct the using words and how we apply meanings to certain things. For example, in the material world it is about objects, such as bricks and books and in the social and psychological world it is about how we apply meanings to things such as love or personality. Identities are also constructed in a way of how we describe ourselves and tell the world who we are. The idea of the self can be considered a social construct too. Our identity is the creation of social interactions with other people and our reactions to the expectations within society. Identities only appear or emerge in relation to one another because without each other they don’t have any meaning. Most of the time the things we experience in this world are just constructs, we as a society have opinions about everything and we experience the world through that objective. Social constructionism is a theory that knowledge and many aspects of the world around us are not real in any of themselves and only exist …show more content…
Key points of social constructionism theories and the groups that are included
Present day social constructionist theories originate back to the works of Immanuel Kant Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790). Kant disputed that in order to have an existence of a world that was independent of human thinking, humans should not state or believe that the world was created by them. Kant stated that the world is without structure and is not divided into things and facts. Structure is imposed on the world by perceiving it and thinking of it in specific ways, as also and by the adoption of particular sets of beliefs, (rather than instead of others) about it (Kant, 2001).
The Social Constructionist
However, limitations have been identified while using social constructivism. “The theory of constructivism has been criticized for the idea that there is no one truth because all truths are equally valid. Constructivism has been considered to be somewhat at odds with the concept of the self as it is typically understood in psychology. Traditionally, psychology has focused on the individual, often minimizing the role of context and culture, but constructivism looks at the context in which the self exists and considers the self to be fluid and changing”
On a general level, structuralism holds that both individuals and the realities they share are signified and constructed by a series of cultural influences which create meaning. The self is said to be a construct of its environment and selves in combination project meaning onto their experienced reality; a reality which in turn becomes reflective of the shared consciousness. This symbiotic relationship between the formulation of a reality and the nature of a collective allow meaning to be interpreted based on the system of constructed codes which informs it.
...he practice of spirituality while maintaining the well being of surrounding factors. Therefore, contributing to the ideology that culture is a tool for social construction.
Social constructivism is defined as the perspective that focuses on people's collective efforts to impose meaning on the world (1). The experiences a person goes through on a daily basis helps shape there perspectives. There are several benefits with social constructivism along with a few disadvantages. The main benefits being that it helps students learn and enjoy more when they are involved rather than sitting behind a desk and just listening
Social learning theory is the theory that people learn from other people. That people will learn by what they see, imitate, and model after. For example, if a person who sees drug dealers their entire life will more than likely be a drug dealer themselves. Labeling theory differs in that people are labeled or stereotyped as a deviant person and therefore engage
Social Process theories are the process of interaction between individuals and society for their explanatory power. In other words a theory in which individuals feel as if society is not helping them leave helpful lives. Some of the theories within Social Process are Social Learning theory, Social Control theory, and Labeling theory. Social Learning theory focuses on what an individual learns from observing others in society. Social Control theory focuses on the bond between people that will shape how that individual will act. Labeling theory is when society gives labels to criminals that may causes them to act like criminals even when they may not be criminals.
When considering the theories sociology presents us, it is important to keep an open mind and allow ourselves to question and think about our own lives and ideas regarding society. Therefore, making assumptions is a key reason why we should study social theory because it also allows for us to question existing ideas made by sociologists, such as Marx, Durkheim, or Weber. For example, Karl Marx has long been questioned on his work with capitalism and his most famous work, The Manifesto of the Communist Party. Marx is a sociologist that is iconic for the symbolism that is associated with his name; however, many of his work’s points allows for us to keep an open mind and question how his work is related to today’s society or how his predictions are disproven or true. In questioning these existing ideas and theories, we can then question our own thinking and find justifications to support or abandon these
Social constructionism is the way one’s reality is shaped through one’s experience and interactions with others, and how one perceives others will experience the interaction with oneself. There are two way that reality is socially constructed, the first is through the looking-glass self coined by Cooley. The looking-glass self describes the process of how one thinks about how others perceive oneself, so one will start to act in a way that fit other’s perception of oneself and taking on that identity. An example of this, is when an employee thinks that his boss believes that he is a hard worker, so the employee will start believing that he is a hard workers, and to maintain this perception the employee will work harder than everyone else. Another
The question ‘who am I?’ raises speculations about who we are as human beings and why we behave the way we do. This is of great interest to social psychologists. One particular theory about this social identity is that it is not fixed or innate but that it is something that changes over time and is constructed through our social interactions with other people. This essay will explicate the idea of socially constructed identities and consider the evidence for and against this view with examples of research studies from both social constructionism (Phoenix, 2007) and Social Identity Theory (SIT) (Turner and Brown, 1978).
...d not develop into the social beings that we are intended and in fact that society demands us to be. While social structures do affect us, they are not the main “building blocks” required to develop us as socially functional individual identities.
In conclusion conceptual relativism sets out to explain the world in term of the human mind to construct realities, and is concerned with truth and knowledge and radical Social constructionism is concerned with the idea that a variety of phenomena’s are socially constructed. This is then linked with the idea of radical anti-realism in relation to reality and the validity of science. Both are definitely problematic for any claim that the social sciences produce reliable knowledge for if knowledge is only meaningful to one group how can that have the same meanings to another group each individual sees the world through their own glasses so each and every individual holds a different opinion and no one opinion can be correct. How can any methods of research be correct if there is no real truth?
Sociocultural relativism: it entails that anthropologist should study the cultural phenomena using the etic perspective; where a sociocultural system such as the community’s behaviour, ideas, and customs is studied within their own context.
Socio-Cultural Theory. The socio-cultural theory is a concept by experts that looks at the essential influences that humanity makes to individual development. It stresses the collaboration between developing individuals and the ethnicity in which they exists. It indicates that human learning is largely a societal process.
Constructivism is a defined, when referring to the learner, as a "receptive act that involves construction of new meaning by learners within the context of their current knowledge, previous experience, and social environment" (Bloom; Perlmutter & Burrell, 1999). Also, real life experiences and previous knowledge are the stepping stones to a constructivism, learning atmosphere. (Spigner-Littles & Anderson, 1999). Constructivism involves the learner being responsible for learning the material and, not necessarily, the teacher (Ely; Foley; Freeman & Scheel, 1995). When learning occurs, the goals, values, and beliefs of the individuals need to be linked to the new data. Also, in constructivism, the person, who is taking in the knowledge, can somehow filter, amend, and reformat the information that he or she feels is important to the schema (Spigner-Littles & Anderson, 1999). A constructivist learner uses the creative approach to apply their own meaning to a topic using the social and cognitive circumstances around themselves (Bloom; Perlmutter & Burrell, 1999). A short and sweet summary of constructivism is "how one attains, develops, and uses cognitive processes" (Airasian & Walsh, 1997).