Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of diversity on work force
Any contridiction for social identity theory
Importance of understanding workforce diversity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of diversity on work force
2.4 Reviews of Relevant Theories
In this section, this study focuses on the following theories: social categorization theory, social identity theory and similarity-attraction theory and person-organization (P-O) values fit model to provide a better understating of workforce diversity and employees commitment.
2.4 Social Categorization Theory
Social categorization theory developed by Turner (1978) describes the categorization of people based on salient attributes like gender, ethnicity or age, resulting in stereotyping on the basis of these differences. Social categorization theory posits that similarities and dissimilarities of demographic can lead formation of different group with resulting effects on member of in-group favourably themselves
…show more content…
The theory is concerned with the existence of multiple identities, the variability of the degree to which people identify with a social group and the role of the social context in social identification (Van Dick, van Knippenberg, Hägele, Guillaume, & Brodbeck, 2008). This theory indicated group members are motivated to maintain their social identities when they evaluate and discovered favorable similar characteristics. The quests for positive distinctiveness make social identity theory to propose that Individuals tend to develop a lot of identities as they move through the stages of their lives (Cennamo & Gardner, 2008). Individuals tend to define themselves in terms of their gender, religion, ethnicity, age, background or profession and “put on” different identities in different circumstances (Sim, etael, 2014). In line with this thinking, Ogbo, Kifordu and Wilfred (2014) observe that in Nigeria, by virtue of its complex web of politically salient identities and history of chronic and seemingly intractable conflicts and instability, competing groups tend to adopt exclusionary, winner-take-all strategies ,with persons having crisscrossing and recursive identities of which the ethnic, religious, regional and sub-ethnic (communal) appear to be the most salient. Thus, members of a group can decide to identify themselves as ‘religious’ rather than ‘ethnic’, as individuals and groups may do from time to time, depending on the level and scope of conflict or uncertainty. Strong group identification can predict whether discriminatory behaviour will or will not occur within a work setting particularly with regard to diversity. Edewor and Aluko (2007) opined that ethno-linguistic and regional identities remain strong in Nigeria as private sector bureaucracies
They then use those components as a framework to analyze the specific mechanisms that are causing this change. In this framework they include typology of categories, which is the agreed upon boundaries that divide society by race, and as the means to measure the growing heterogeneity in this category they use survey data’s to analyze the shift in typology over time. The survey data’s show which racial categories individuals identify with while filling out these surveys, and by analyzing these data’s the authors were able to find out that over time people started to check multiple boxes/categories while identifying with their race. Secondly, the authors used classification of individuals, which is grouping people based on shared attributes. This is when individuals become part of a group by having shared or similar attributes that other members of the group identify with. The authors turned to science in order to identify the changes in this category. It was seen that over time the genetic makeup of individuals in different groups started to change, this can be due to reasons like interatrial marriages which allow the offspring’s to identify with multiple racial & ethnic categories. Then the authors use the relative position of groups, which is the social hierarchy of groups
In conclusion, society shapes our perspective on people which classifies them into various social groups. Each defined by different characteristics that can be physical, ideological or ethnical. This leads to a discrimination of them for their difference traits. For this reason in the novel social groups are represented in particular ways so the audience can reflect over stereotypical issues.
In the Social Identity Theory(SIT), TT, looked at inter groups relations from an identity perspective. They claimed, layered on top, beside and underneath inter group conflict is identity issues. Therefore, group identity becomes a psychological engine that allows us to understand how group conflict emerges. In this essay I will focus on 3 concepts SIT suggests. The first social comparison and distinctiveness are concepts which give insights about person’s psychology in his group’s affect on it. For gay people, it is obvious that they are not in a helathy place with these 2 concepts. After I talk about instability which is a cognitive alternative that shows gays that their relative position in the society can be changed. Later, I talk about 5 stage model which incorporates macro and micro to explain intergroup relations. I
Some of the strengths of the social identity theory are that; throughout the years it has supported many empirical studies, it has also demonstrated the social categorization in intergroup behaviors, allowed us to differentiate between social and personal identities and has provide explanations for other areas of psychology (conformity). A weaknesses of the Social identity theory is that its application is restricted in the sense that it has very low ecological validity. Another weakness is that SIT favors situational factors rather than dispositional is not supported by evidence. The social Identity theory can be used to how to explain how we form our social and personal identities in the terms of in and out groups. SIT can also be used to explain why there is conflict between humans and different societies.
Some suggest that the self-categorization theory that is imbedded within the Social Identity Theory is invalid. In the 1970s, empirical research was conducted to prove self-categorization theory, however, most fell up short. Apparently, many researchers couldn’t provide a consistent correlation between ingroup identification and ingroup bias; this also meant the self-categorization theory was inconsistent with the Social Identity Theory (Hornsey, 2008). However, others argue that the self-categorization theory is too broad and powerful to be proven false (Hogg & Williams
Nigeria is a constitutional republic in West Africa. The majority of its citizens are Muslim (50.5%) and Christians (48.2%), the rest belongs to other smaller local religions. Because of this major diversity in the religious viewpoints many of the citizens in the Nigeria does not identify themselves as people
Stereotyping is a form of pre judgement that is as prevalent in today's society as it was 2000 years ago. It is a social attitude that has stood the test of time and received much attention by social psychologists and philosophers alike. Many approaches to, or theories of stereotyping have thus been raised. This essay evaluates the cognitive approach that categorisation is an essential cognitive process that inevitably leads to stereotyping. Hamilton (1979) calls this a 'depressing dilemma'.
What are the different categories of stereotype do people belong their selves in? What are the possible factors that cause prejudices among the different groups? And what is the possible implication of having stereotypes in our society. The researcher also included in their study the profile of the respondents to determine what possible terms can affect the way a person is categorized to a group. In addition to this, they would also like to distinguish if belonging to a certain category can affect the students, either academically, socially or
The impact of diversity in the workplace is contingent upon several factors. Across companies diversified workforces are becoming increasingly common. To successfully manage a diverse workforce, organizations are ensuring that employees understand how their values and stereotypes influence their behavior toward others of different gender, ethnic, racial, or religious backgrounds; are gaining an appreciation of cultural differences among themselves; and behaviors that isolate or intimidate minorities are being improved (Noe et al., 2010, pg. 302).
According to Baron, Byrne & Suls in their book Attitudes: Evaluating the social world. (1989) they defined the term Social Psychology as “the scientific field that seeks to understand the nature and causes of individual behavior in social situations”. (p. 6). There are many concepts of social perception, two of these that will be looked at in this essay are Implicit Personality Theory and stereotypes. Implicit personality theory describes the beliefs, biases and assumptions, that an individual uses when he or she forms impressions on a stranger based on limited information. The way we form impressions and the different conclusions we make about other people based upon our individual impressions is also part of this theory. One of the first people to investigate how people form impressions was Solomon Asch in the 1940’s in his experiment ‘Forming Impressions of Personality' he was interested in how people form impressions and if certain traits affected peoples impressions. A good example of Implicit personality theory is if someone who is considered unpredictable they may be considered dangerous. The second Concept of Social Psychology that will be considered is stereotypes. Cardwell (1996) described stereotypes as “...A fixed, over generalized belief about a particular group or class of people.” may have beliefs and thoughts on different social groups and individual people and how they should act, and believe that all people in that group conform and have the same characteristics as the rest. By using stereotypes, it helps us simplify how we think of the social world as having a stereotype reduces our thinking process when we meet new people. An example of stereotyping is saying that all French people wear berets and have garlic a...
Person-Organization fit theories play an important role when organizations want to attract new employees. Person-Organization fit, abbreviated as P-O fit, is a popular theory, however its origin is unclear. “Models of P–O fit have grown increasingly popular as explanations of organization attraction and choice during the last decade (Kristof, 1996, as cited in Roberson, Collins & Oreg, 2005, p. 324)”.
Labeling theory was introduced by Howard Becker “to explain why certain people are viewed as deviant and others engaging in the same behavior are not” (18). In addition, labeling theory can explain some stereotypes based on race and ethnicity. Stereotypes are unreliable, exaggerated generalizations about all members of a group that do not take individual differences into account (416). Stereotypes of ethnic or racial minority groups are usually negative and can label the whole group as such. There are two scenarios to view how stereotypes in labeling theory affect different groups.
The Expression of In-group Bias within Artificial Groups There is a widespread understanding that humans show bias towards members of their own group over members of other groups in a variety of ways. Ample research has been conducted on this phenomenon through the lens of social identity theory. First developed by Henri Tajfel during the 1970s (as cited in Hogg, 2006), social identity theory describes phenomena such as prejudice, discrimination, intergroup behaviour, group categorization and group polarization. Wetherell (1987) describes group polarization as being an important influence on group behaviour as well as a significant factor leading to segregation between groups. From the perspective of social identity theory, in-group bias is
Social Categorization Humans are very efficient creatures and we use many tools to compress, utilize, and retain information. One of the tools that we use is termed social categorization. Social categorization describes a kind organization used by people to remember social interactions. By thinking of people as members of a group rather than as individuals one can simplify and recall information quickly. As social creatures, humans come in contact with many people of different colors, shapes, sizes, and genders so this categorization, to some degree, is useful.
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary (n.d.) defines diversity as “the condition of having or being composed of differing elements; especially, the inclusion of different types of people (as people of different races or cultures) in a group or organization”. In general, diversity is often only related with differences in race and gender. In actuality, numerous elements can determine diversification in the workplace. Elements such as skills, abilities, experience, values, age, and education could be part of a diverse footprint in an organization. Other important attributes related to diversity include disabilities, religion, sexual orientation, and marital status (Guillame et al., 2013). The adoption of diversity in the workplace has the potential to increase organizational effectiveness in many ways. Organizations that practice diversity tend to increase their capacity to innovate and make better decisions.