Smokeless Tobacco Essay

1229 Words3 Pages

Smokeless tobacco saves lives
When it comes to some people 's opinion about tobacco they just think it is all terrible; however, many doctors have proven that it is not the case with smokeless tobacco. There are people in the world who say smokeless tobacco is awful because it causes mouth cancer, tooth loss, and gum disease because they have listened to the anti-tobacco corporations and the incorrect warning labels. There are also doctors and businesses in several countries that have proven that it does not cause any of these medical problems. Instead of people assuming that they should cut out all tobacco products, they should try to educate themselves in the benefits of chewing tobacco. In the end people will find that smokeless tobacco …show more content…

Many people in this country have listened to the anti-tobacco corporations saying for years that all tobacco products cause mouth cancer, while the corporations are correct in saying smoking causes mouth cancer because it is in fact the leading driver of mouth cancer, they are incorrect in saying smokeless tobacco causes mouth cancer. According to Brad Rodu, a renowned oral pathologist who has studied the benefits of smokeless tobacco over smoking for twenty years, “The risk of mouth cancer among smokeless tobacco users is extremely low – certainly lower than the risk of smoking-related diseases among smokers.” Dr. Rodu says in his interview with the CEO and founder of Mud Jug, Darcy Compton, that smoking actually causes ninety percent of mouth cancer, after that is drinking alcohol, HIV, even eating an apple and chewing tobacco. In fact, according to Dr. Rodu, chewing tobacco’s risks for mouth cancer are so low that they cannot be distinguished from that of a person who does not do any of these harmful products. While doctors have found that smokeless tobacco can cause leukoplakia, a mucous membrane disorder characterized by white patches, especially on the cheek and tongue, they still find that smokeless tobacco is ninety-eight percent safer than smoking. According to Carl V. Phillips, “oral leukoplakia occurs commonly in smokeless tobacco users, but it primarily represents irritation …show more content…

According to Dr. Rodu, “all of the misinformation about dipping and chewing is from a study done in 1981 about powdered dry snuff.” If the anti-tobacco corporations are going to be giving modern day people information about why smokeless tobacco is bad for them, they need to be giving out information from recent studies on actual smokeless tobacco users. Swedish Match, a Swedish company based in Stockholm that makes snus, moist snuff, and chewing tobacco, wants to have the warning label read, “This product is not a safe alternative to smoking” changed to read that, although smokeless tobacco is not the safest option, it is a safer alternative to smoking. Unfortunately corporations are not allowed promote any tobacco products since that is illegal, they should be able point out that smokeless tobacco is less harmful than smoking. The users of smokeless tobacco along with all of the people who are strongly against chewing tobacco can see from the research that Dr. Rodu and research that has been done in Sweden that the warning labels on smokeless tobacco products have no scientific evidence to back them

More about Smokeless Tobacco Essay

Open Document