Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on the power of forgiveness
An essay about forgiveness
Essay on the enigma of forgiveness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the book, The Sunflower by Simon Wiesenthal a Holocaust survivor, talks about his personal experience with a Nazi soldier named Karl who ask for his forgiveness on behalf of the crimes which he did to other Jewish people. And when Edward H. Flannery goes to read the Symposium, the second part of The Sunflower. Flannery reads his response to Mr. Wiesenthal's question “What would you have done in my place?” As Flannery readed over some of other people’s responses, but what caught his attention the most was Matthieu Ricard’s understanding and compassionate response to Mr. Wiesenthal's question. Flannery was a Roman Catholic priest living near Providence, Rhode Island. Also, he served as a member of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops’ …show more content…
Ricard, Your response to Simon Wiesenthal's book “The Sunflower” has intrigued me. Because we both decided to forgive Karl if we were in Mr. Wiesenthal’s situation. Even though our religions are different; you are a Buddhist and I am a Roman Catholic, both of us have agreed upon forgiving Karl because of our beliefs and religion. I can understand why Simon has chosen to stay silent and leave Karl when he was asked to forgive him on behalf of the crimes he has done to other jewish people. What caught my attention the most was when you said “ the only good thing about evil, is that it can be purified”. What my teachings have taught me is: one must give forgiveness to those who are sincerely repentant. I can somewhat understand what you are trying to say; is that if one is truly sorry for their crimes then one can be forgiven. So, I can agree upon your Buddhist saying. I also agree that forgiveness is not the end, but the beginning for healing of the victim and perpetrator. Because Simon writes about the bystanders who watch and did not do anything, he also writes, “Was it not just as wicked for people to look on quietly and without protest at human being enduring such shocking humiliation?” Also, is it not the same as watching the dying Nazi who is asking for mercy before his final moments on Earth? Would it not also fall under Simon’s description of …show more content…
Your opinion about forgiving can turn negative feelings into to positive ones which I agree. Forgiveness can surely help the victim and perpetrator in the process of healing just like you said in the book, “To grant forgiveness to someone who has truly changed is not a way of condoning or forgetting his or her past crimes, but of acknowledging whom he or she has become”. I agree because if one forgives someone does not mean that person is going to forget their crimes, but acknowledge what has become of them and how they will act in future based on their experience. So to get to the point of Mr. Wiesenthal question, “What would you have done in my place?” I do hope that I would forgive Karl and as a religious man I would have told him to ask for God’s forgiveness. Furthermore, to pray for his soul and the victims of his inhumane crimes. Here I will be saying my goodbyes to you Matthieu, for I feel this will be the end of our conversation, but hopefully in the near future we will talk in person about our views of the world. With respect I am truly grateful for your response to my letter and for sharing your view on what you thought about this book with me.
He should not have forgiven him because, “One soldier got up from the bench and looked at us as if we were animals in a zoo” (Wiesenthal 20). “Rectifying a misdeed is a matter to be settled between the perpetrator and this victim” (Wiesenthal 54). This shows only a small portion of what the Jewish people were treated as during this time. They were treated like animals, yet they are completely human. Also, an approximate eleven million people were killed during the Holocaust. Six million were Polish citizens, three million were Polish Jews, and another three million were Polish Christians. A single person who was not affected by the soldiers decisions cannot represent the eleven million people who were affected. In order to achieve actual “forgiveness” he would need to speak to every single person who was
In the symposium section, Abraham Joshua Heschel quoted, “No one can forgive crimes committed against other people. It is therefore preposterous to assume that anybody alive can extend forgiveness for the suffering of any one of the six million people who perished.” (171). Simon Wiesenthal would possibly never forgive the SS officer because he doesn’t represents to those who suffer and died by the SS officers because he is just one jewish person out of many different jews that died. At that point, Simon Wiesenthal does not represent the rest of the jews and other Holocaust
In Simon Wiesenthal’s The Sunflower, he recounts his incidence of meeting a dying Nazi soldier who tells Simon that he was responsible for the death of his family. Upon telling Simon the details, Karl asks for his forgiveness for what he helped accomplish. Simon leaves Karl without giving him an answer. This paper will argue that, even though Karl admits to killing Simon’s family in the house, Simon is morally forbidden to forgive Karl because Karl does not seem to show genuine remorse for his committed crime and it is not up to Simon to be able to forgive Karl for his sins. This stand will be supported by the meaning of forgiveness, evidence from the memoir, quotes from the published responses to Simon’s moral question, and arguments from Thomas Brudholm, Charles Griswold, and Trudy Govier. The possibly raised objection, for this particular modified situation, of forgiveness being necessary to move on from Desmond Tutu will be countered with the logic of needing to eventually find an end somewhere.
I think he felt that if he got your forgiveness then he could die in peace for all the bad he had done. A lot of Jewish people had died due to what Hitler ordered everyone in Germany army to do. Albert Speer was a high-ranking Nazi member and he was also Hitler’s minister and even though he knew he was going to jail no matter what was said at the Nuremberg trials he had confessed to all the things he had done. According to Speer “My moral guilt is not subject to the statute of limitations, it cannot be erased in my lifetime” (245). In making this comment, Speer knew that even though he was punished with twenty years of imprisonment that they only punished his legal guilt. Speer was haunted by the things he had done and he knew that he did not deserve anyone’s forgiveness. Even Speer, Hitler’s minister, knew that no one in the German army deserved anyone’s sympathy or
middle of paper ... ... Works Cited “About Simon Wiesenthal.” – Simon Wiesenthal Center. N.p., n.d. Web.
That doubt plagued Wiesel, causing him to abandon his faith and walk away from it. However, that nameless “neighbor” he encountered not only walked away, but followed a different path, a path where the man intending to slaughter the Jewish people was the sole figure he believed in.
Forgiveness is to stop feeling angry, to stop blaming someone for the way they made a person feel, and stop feeling victims of whatever wickedness was directed towards them. Is forgiveness necessary? Can everyone be forgiven despite the circumstances? If forgiveness depends on the situation, then is it necessary at all? Does forgiveness allow someone to continue their life in peace? Is forgiving someone who causes physical pain to someone, as a pose to forgiving someone who murdered a member of the family the same? If someone can forgive one of these acts so easily can the other be forgiven just as easy? Forgiveness allows for someone to come to terms with what they have experienced. In the case of murder forgiveness is necessary because it allows for someone to be at peace with themselves knowing they no longer have to live with hatred. It also allows someone to begin a new life with new gained experience and different perspectives on life. Forgiveness is necessary from a moral perspective because it allows someone to get rid of hatred and find peace within him or herself to move on with their lives.
When human lives are endangered, when human dignity is in jeopardy, national borders and sensitivities become irrelevant.” (Moore) While living in brutal conditions, Wiesel did everything he could for himself and others. He prayed almost four times a day for the ending of the holocaust. Fighting through starvation, Wiesel was never selfish and continuously worked to help other Jews escape. While helping others, Wiesel was still a young man with hope to escape himself and tell his stories to the world.
Forgiving someone is a way to release us from the pain they have brought us. Justice can just be
In 1999, he was invited to speak at the Millennium Lectures, in front of the president, first lady, and other important governmental figures,. In his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”, he uses rhetorical devices to get emotional responses and to connect with the audience. He wants to create awareness of the dangers of indifference and show how there needs to be change. His speech eloquently calls out the government for their lack of response during the Holocaust, and warns against continued disregard for the struggles of others. He sees indifference as being the ally of the enemy, and without compassion there is no hope for the victims.
It is a means of self-liberation and self-empowerment” (About forgiveness – Candles). This is a quote from Eva Kor. Forgiving those perpetrators involved in the Holocaust is a highly debated topic. However, Kor saw it as a necessity for herself to be liberated from the pain. Kor stated that, “I forgave the Nazis not because they deserved it but because I deserved it” (Forgiving the Nazis). Another quote from Kor explains the complex nature of forgiveness, “The day I forgave the Nazis, privately I forgave my parents whom I hated all my life for not having saved me from Auschwitz. Children expect their parents to protect them; mine couldn’t. And then I forgave myself for hating my parents” (Forgiving the Nazis). The public display of forgiveness allowed Kor to remove hate and negativity that accumulated throughout her life. This will allow people to be liberated in a healthy and meaningful way, like Kor was. There are physical health benefits of forgiving. After granting forgiveness people have lower blood pressure, sleep better, need fewer medications, and overall, feel better physically (John Hopkins). The physical and emotional health benefits that forgiveness offers can change a survivor’s life for the
I thought angrily. How do You compare to this stricken mass gathered to affirm to You their faith, their anger, their defiance? What does Your grandeur mean, Master of the Universe, in the face of all this cowardice, this decay, and this misery? Why do go on troubling these poor people’s wounded minds, their ailing bodies? … Blessed be God’s name? Why, but why would I bless Him? Every fiber in me rebelled. … But look at these men whom You have betrayed, allowing them to be tortured, slaughtered, gassed, and burned, what do they do? The pray before You! They praise Your name! … I was the accuser, God the accused. My eyes had opened and I was alone, terribly alone in a world without God, without man.” (Wiesel
Wiesel’s speech, persuasive in nature, was designed to educate his audience as to the violence and killing of innocent people across the globe. Wiesel spoke of acts that had taken place throughout his lifetime, from his youth, up through present day atrocities. His focu...
Due to the fact, that for me it's really hard to answer Wiesenthal's question, because I believe that the answer to this question is a case of religion and morality where some people may argue in a religious way as Edward H. Flannery "Jesus answer to the question of how many times one must forgive. Should it be "seven times"? Speaking out of his Jewish traditions, his answer was "seventy times seven times", a metaphorical way of saying "always'"(Flannery 137). in making this comment, Flannery argues in a Christianity way, that absolution is required when ask on deathbed, that's mean that anyone has to forgive anyone even if he doesn't want to do it. I could agree with Flannery, if Karl knew the religion of Christianity and if he believed in Jesus he deserved was forgiven. However, we don't know the intensions of Karl, because Wiesenthal didn't say anything to Karl, which leads to reflect
Forgiveness is the act of releasing an offender of any wrong or hurt they may have caused you whether they deserve it or not. It is a decision to let go of resentment or vengeance toward a person or group of people. When we choose to forgive, we’re wiping the slate clean, cancelling a debt, or as I love to say, “Letting it go.” In the Bible, the Greek word for forgiveness literally means to “let it go.” This concept, “forgiveness,” is easier said than done. Majority of people find it very difficult to let go of offenses and hurts caused by others. I really do believe that most people desire to let it go, but we lack the knowledge of how to do it. As believers, we are instructed by God maintain an attitude of forgiveness.