A range of different themes are explored of the poems “Who’s for the Game’ by Jessie Pope and ‘Dulce et Decorum Est’ by Wilfred Owen. Some ideas explored within the poems include war being a way of showing love for one’s country, vulnerability to attack and the death of young men. In each respective poem, these ideas are analysed using stylistic devices and language techniques to portray differing perspectives on similar ideologies towards war. Both Pope and Owen attempt to create persuasive pieces through using a range of techniques such as similes, metaphors, personification and a variation of other poetic and persuasive techniques.
The idea that war is a way of showing love for one’s country is portrayed heavily in ‘Who’s for the Game?”, and this idea is directly opposed in Dulce et Decorum Est. However, different techniques are used to support each
…show more content…
respective theme. Jessie Pope uses the structure of the poem of an iambic pentameter to create lyrical features. This helps to create a pleasant rhythm that supports this idea through creating a child-like sounding lullaby that create associations with love and trust. Pope also uses personification to create the idea that England is “looking and calling for [them].” This creates a sense of patriotism that by going to war, not only are the men helping their country, but showing love to ‘her’ also. (Line 16). In contrast, Wilfred Owen creates a strong idea that is in juxtaposition to the previous poem. Owen uses language to announce his idea that it is ‘the old lie; Dolce et decorum est Pro patria mori.” (Line 27-28) This shows that Wilfred Owen is opposed to the idea that it is sweet and honourable to die for one’s country through directly stating it. This creates a harsh and immediately noticeable contrast to the propaganda of ‘Who’s for the Game?’. Another perspective on war portrayed by Wilfred Owen is that soldiers are vulnerable to attack.
Owen uses strong imagery such as similes to portray this. Owen shows the realistic vulnerability of soldiers “bent double, like old beggars under sacks” (Line 1), vividly conveying the fact that soldiers become so weary and injured that they no longer have the ability to be aware of their surroundings and thus are incredibly vulnerable to attack, their surroundings and sickness. This is further supported by paradox, used in “men march(ing) asleep” (Line 5). This shows the pure exhaustion that soldiers awake are now no better off than if they were asleep and unaware. In ‘Who’s for the Game?” this idea is contradicted through metaphors. Pope uses an extended metaphor of games to create an energetic appeal to war. War is depicted as men eagerly “toe(ing) the line for the signal to ‘Go!’” (Line 5). This creates the image in the audience minds that there will always be a sense of alertness and excited anticipation during even the hard days that is differing to Owen’s perspective that war is exhausting and breeds
vulnerability. A theme illustrated throughout ‘Dulce et Decorum Est’ is that young men will die. This idea is formed through the use of visual and aural imagery. Owen shows that “under a green sea, [he] saw him drowning.” (Line 14), this creates a strong mental depiction of the horrific scene of young men and comrades dying. Visual imager is also used throughout the final stanza and speaks of the torment of “incurable sores on innocent tongues” (Line 24). This line illustrates the fact that the men dying are young and consequently innocent, and powerfully portraying the unnecessary wastage of life who wanted for “some desperate glory” (line 26). Jessie Pope, however ignores the possibility of death and has the perspective that war “won’t be a picnic –not much–” (Line 7). This serves to convince the audience that war will be easy and that soldiers will always return with fantastical stories. This is further upheld when using rhetorical questions to ask “who would much rather come back with a crutch…?” (Line 9) this creates the belief that men may come back injured, but they will come back. By showing this, Pope manipulates the audience into agreeing that war is likely to not harm them, and thus holds the perspective that men will not die at war. In this regard, Owen and Pope have opposing perspectives that are portrayed using differing stylistic techniques. In conclusion, both Wilfred Owen and Jessie Pope have conveyed strong perspective towards war in their respective poems. Jessie Pope has been mediocrely successful in influencing reader’s perspectives towards her belief that war is a way of showing love to ones country through the use of various stylistic techniques such as imagery and rhythm. In comparison, Wilfred Owen has been extremely successful in portraying his perspective of the futility and horrors of war through his use of language and poetic techniques including similes, metaphors and imagery. Wilfred Owen’s poem has a more serious tone than Pope’s which aided in the persuasiveness of ‘Dulce et Decorum Est’.
Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen and Seaman, 1941 by Molly Holden both present different interpretations or views on war. These different views will have a variety of impact on the reader. The two poems also have several recognizable similarities, which connects them both together. There are many factors to be considered when comparing the similarities and differences between these poems, such as perspective, imagery, time period, etc. These, and many more, will be looked at and analysed in this essay.
Also it is comparing the war to a game, which is a euphemism as well as a metaphor. It is a euphemism because war is a very serious, dangerous matter; whereas a game is something that people enjoy and never get seriously injured in. By using this euphemism, Jessie Pope - the poet – lessens the severity of war, and makes her readers’ think of it as enjoyable, and something that they want to do.
In contrast, ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ gives us the complete opposite. It takes away the lie that describes the war as a place of pleasure and vividness. When in reality it is a...
The Poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” attempts to make war seem as repulsive as possible. The author’s goal is to discourage people from joining the war or any future conflicts by shattering the romantic image people have of the fighting. The setting of this poem helps
On the first read-through of Wilfred Owen’s Dulce et Decorum Est it seems to just be a poem describing a soldiers experience in World War I, but there is much more to the story than that. Through the use of several literary techniques, Owen is able to vividly describe the speaker’s experiences and at the same time make them relatable to the people reading the poem. He also is able to criticize the people who he thinks are at least partly responsible for “tricking” a younger, more gullible him into the situation in the first place.
Do you want to participate in a game called war? This is the question 'Who’s for the game' is written by Jessie Pope focusses on, war in the form of games. This piece is written during the first World War in 1916 and was originally published in the daily mail. The daily mail is a tabloid newspaper aimed at blue coloured workers. Jessie pope was pro-war and quite jingoistic. the poem wants the men to participate in the war and to make sure this happens, pope compares the war to a game to make them more excited. this is one of the reasons this poem is persuasive by forcing the men to join the war. Other significant elements that will be focussed on are the tone, the literary devices used and the rhyme scheme.
Wilfred Owen’s “Dulce et Decorum Est” and E. E Cummings’, “next to of course god america i” are poems that critique patriotic propaganda. Both poems use words and images to effectively depict the influence that patriotic propaganda has on war. “Dulce et Decorum Est” uses descriptive words to create realistic images of the horrors soldiers are faced with during combat, whereas “next to of course god america i” uses sarcasm to inform readers that the abuse of propaganda can be used to manipulate others. The attitudes they convey are quite similar; both suggest that propaganda is a lie; it is not sweet and fitting to die for one’s country.
Comparing two war poems written by Wilfred Owen: Dulce et decorum Est. and Anthem for Doomed Youth. In this essay I will be comparing two war poems written by Wilfred Owen: ‘Dulce et decorum Est’ and ‘Anthem for Doomed Youth’. By Comparing the two I will be able to distinguish the fact that Wilfred Owen is very anti-propaganda and that's why he feels so strongly about this. The two poems have many similarities but also a fair amount of differences, which I will be discussing in this essay.
The simple definition of war is a state of armed competition, conflict, or hostility between different nations or groups; however war differs drastically in the eyes of naive children or experienced soldiers. Whether one is a young boy or a soldier, war is never as easy to understand as the definition. comprehend. There will inevitably be an event or circumstance where one is befuddled by the horror of war. For a young boy, it may occur when war first breaks out in his country, such as in “Song of Becoming.” Yet, in “Dulce et Decorum Est” it took a man dying in front of a soldier's face for the soldier to realize how awful war truly is. Both “Song of Becoming” and “Dulce et Decorum Est” are poems about people experiencing the monstrosity of war for the first time. One is told from the perspective of young boys who were stripped of their joyful innocence and forced to experience war first hand. The other is from the perspective of a soldier, reflecting on the death of one of his fellow soldiers and realizing that there is nothing he can do to save him. While “Song of Becoming” and “Dulce et Decorum Est” both focus on the theme of the loss of innocence, “Song of Becoming” illustrates how war affects the lives of young boys, whereas “Dulce et Decorum Est” depicts the affect on an experienced soldier.
Owen as a young soldier held the same romantic view on war as majority of the other naive soldiers who thought that war would be an exciting adventure. The documentary extract illustrates how markedly Owen’s perspective of the war changed, as noted in a letter to his mother while he was still in the front lines: “But extra for me, there is the universal perversion of ugliness, the distortion of the dead ... that is what saps the soldierly spirit.” In ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’, Owen’s change of heart is evident through the irony of the poem title and the ending line “The old Lie; Dulce et Decorum est, Pro patria mori.”, an allusion to the Roman axiom made famous by Horace, which translates to “The old Lie; It is sweet and right to die for your country.”. The line depicts Owen’s realisation that the horrific nature of war through human conflict is not sweet and right at all, rather, it is appalling and “bitter as the cud” as death is always present on the battlefield. Additionally, Owen indirectly responds to Jessie Pope’s poetry, a pro-war poetess, through the reference “My friend, you would not tell with such high zest… The old lie…”, further highlighting his changed perspective towards the war which has been influenced
It is evident that the socio-cultural context in which Wilfred Owen operated had a powerful impact upon his poetic motivation and the messages he conveyed through his work. Before exploring Wilfred Owen’s work we first must understand the society that Wilfred Owen lived in, to be able to really understand appreciate his poems and their impact on society. At the time in which he operated, Britain’s public opinion on warfare and conflicts were astonishingly positive, especially in the early stages of WW1. These false perception on war led the vast majority of male citizens to perceive war recruitment as an opportunity to set off on ‘terrific adventures’ and earn immense amounts of honour for their families and nation. Government propaganda meant that soldiers believed that they were gathering fame and fortune in the name of Great Britain. This cruel and false perception of warfare which in turn led to a steady rate of volunteers for the war and included Wilfred Owen himself. The men who did not go and fight for their nations were perceived by society as cowards as
In ‘Anthem of Doomed Youth’ Owen shows another version of the suffering- the mourning of the dead soldiers. When Owen asks “What passing-bells for these who die as cattle?”, his rhetorical question compares the soldiers to cattle as they die and suffer undignified. Owen uses this extended metaphor to confront us with the truth, that there are too many fatalities in war. As such, the soldier’s deaths are compared to livestock, to emphasise their poor treatment and question our perspective about soldiers dying with honour. With an overwhelming death toll of over 9 million during WWI, Owen depicts how the soldier’s die with the repetition of “Only the...” to emphasise the sounds of war that kills soldiers in the alliteration ‘rifles’ rapid rattle.’ Owen also illustrates the conditions that the soldiers died in and how they were not given a proper funeral in the cumulation ‘no prayers nor bells,/ nor any voice of mourning.’ Owen painfully reminds us that we have become complacent with the deaths of soldiers, seeing them as a necessary sacrifice during human conflict. Thus, Owen shows us what we have overlooked about war, that is, that it brings endless death and long-lasting grief to the surviving soldiers and the people around
Wilfred Owen’s poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” makes the reader acutely aware of the impact of war. The speaker’s experiences with war are vivid and terrible. Through the themes of the poem, his language choices, and contrasting the pleasant title preceding the disturbing content of the poem, he brings attention to his views on war while during the midst of one himself. Owen uses symbolism in form and language to illustrate the horrors the speaker and his comrades go through; and the way he describes the soldiers, as though they are distorted and damaged, parallels how the speaker’s mind is violated and haunted by war.
How Wilfred Owen Uses Language and Imagery in His Poetry to Communicate his Attitudes of War
History is an important to today’s modern society because it shows the attitudes and culture of that society and shows patterns of society that can teach us how to avoid such things as genocide and war. The piece that will be adapted in this essay is Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen which will be adapted into a movie. There will have to be some changes to the poem to the length of the plot and setting up the beginning of the story. The movie will also have to keep with the overall theme of the story that war is grim and the effect that war has on soldiers. With an adaptation to a new medium, aspects of the poem could be lost or strengthen. The visuals would be strengthened because the poem has descriptive imagery and the movie would be able to stress the imagery. But with a change to a movie the overall message could be lost because of the way that people would perceive the movie, if they just watch to see World War one in action then they will miss the message about war. The reason why this piece is interesting to adapt because of the message that Wilfred Owen had that war is horrible and the façade of the leaders of war.