War is a drastic measure taken when disagreements and conflicts occur and happens all over the world, each executed in a different style. In “The Red Badge of Courage” war was perceived one way while “American Sniper” was an entirely different experience. While the goals were similar, the way in which they were achieve greatly varied. Both accounts portrayed the commonalities and differences of each war through displaying different fighting techniques, having both through the eyes of war heroes, and showing the emotions of the different soldiers and how war made them suffer.
Although both men were soldiers, Henry Fleming from “The Red Badge of Courage” and Chris Kyle from the film “American Sniper” saw very different styles of fighting during
…show more content…
their time in the military. Henry fought during the civil war when war tactics were less innovative and more native while Chris experienced a guerrilla warfare type combat in the Iraq war. Chris says, “Savage, despicable evil. That's what we were fighting in Iraq. That's why a lot of people, myself included, called the enemy savages. There really was no other way to describe what we encountered there.”(American Sniper). Every war is dangerous and unpredictable no matter how it is fought or who is involved. This is proven to be true after learning about the causalities and injuries accounted for in both wars. The protagonist in each story were considered to be war heroes and fought desperately for their country.
Having the stories told through the eyes of the two men helped see what war was like and the traumas faced in each. It also helped to understand what made both men great soldiers and how they exceled in battle. Chris stood out because he was a skillful sniper who could rid of the enemy quickly and accurately. Henry fought as best he could and was not afraid to risk his life for his country at least in his later battles especially proven when he dropped his weapon to carry the American flag, which confirmed his bravery. “Within him, as he hurled himself forward, was born a love, a despairing fondness for this flag which was near him. It was a creation of beauty and invulnerability. It was a goddess, radiant, that bended its form with an imperious gesture to him. It was a woman, red and white, hating and loving, that called him with the voice of his hopes. Because no harm could come to it he endowed it with power. He kept near, as if it could be a saver of lives, and an imploring cry went from his mind.”(Crane …show more content…
81). Even though both men were outstanding soldiers, they faced extreme inner and outer conflicts with themselves and others.
Henry encounters his conflicts more in the beginning of the novel when he is afraid to die and continuously runs from battle. “He had fled, he told himself, because annihilation approached. He had done a good part in saving himself, who was a little piece of the army. He had considered the time, he said, to be one in which it was the duty of every little piece to rescue itself if possible.”(Crane 33). He wants a wound to show his courage that he clearly does not have and it takes time before he becomes selfless and fights with great honor. Chris’s main conflict was having to always leave his family while he was in Iraq and not being there for his wife and children. He wants both and cannot decide between his two commitments and eventually others begin to decide for him. The struggles both men faced greatly impacted both their lives forcing them to deal with these issues directly and
alone. Although these men fought with pride and dignity, they also experienced many conflicts that had a larger impact on them then war itself. Fighting in battle and risking your life for your country is a great commitment that can change a person and their life forever. The emotions and challenges that these men go through especially when they are striving to succeed is almost unbearable. Both stories relate to one another because they share so many similarities throughout the told experiences and showed the vulnerability of these men during this time and how they each coped with their lifestyles.
Henry is worried about how he will do in this first battle. He isn't. sure if he will run or not, and he is scared that he might. He doesn't. want to look like a fool and run, but he is also scared of getting killed.
The hero of The Red Badge of Courage, which was written by Stephen Crane in the late 1800s, was a young private named Henry Fleming, who was fighting for the North in the American Civil War. Like Pip, in Great Expectations, Henry was a commoner. He was new to the Army and few people knew his name. The main difference between Henry and the earlier heroes is that Henry was not born with leadership qualities or traits like bravery. In fact, in the first battle he fought, he proved himself to be a coward by running from it.
In The Red Badge of Courage, Henry Fleming was drawn to enlist by his boyhood dreams. His highly romanticized notion of war was eclectic, borrowing from various classical and medieval sources. Nevertheless, his exalted, almost deified, conception of the life of a soldier at rest and in combat began to deflate before the even the ink had dried on his enlistment signature. Soon the army ceased to possess any personal characteristics Henry had once envisioned, becoming an unthinking, dispas...
In conclusion, the Sniper is, interestingly, a complete contradiction in himself. He is both experienced and amateur, cold and emotional, lusting after war and hating it, self-assured and vulnerable, and logical and mad. This stark paradox may create much of the inner conflict that goes on within the Sniper, and also reflects the outer conflict of the Irish war- a war where both sides are essentially opposing parts of the same whole.
In the Red Badge of Courage, the protagonist Henry, is a young boy who yearns to be a Great War hero, even though he has never experienced war himself. Anxious for battle, Henry wonders if he truly is courageous, and stories of soldiers running make him uncomfortable. He struggles with his fantasies of courage and glory, and the truth that he is about to experience. He ends up running away in his second battle. Henry is somewhat nave, he dreams of glory, but doesn't think much of the duty that follows.
He struggled to fight and ran away. He felt ashamed of himself and wanted to change. He saw what JIm did and how he put all his effort and life into this war. Henry destroyed his guilt and lead his regiment into victory. He changed from cowardice and fear to courage, humility, and wisdom. My emotional response was motivational because Henry was afraid and his fear almost consumed him but, he rose up and developed the courage to be victorious.
At the beginning of the novel Henry is disappointed of war; he had far greater expectations of war. He wants one thing out of this experience, Glory, and he would go to any extreme to fulfill it. In battle Henry acts impulsively and is easily manipulated, he flees from battle at the sight of others running. When he realizes his cowardice he rationalizes without end to why he ran. He justifies that nature also flees at the sight of fear when he scares a squirrel to runoff. Henry acts shallow and vain when he manipulates his friend, Wilson; he uses the letters Wilson gave him as leverage if Wilson finds out Henry's "crimes". His pride is restored when he finds out that he doesn't get caught. He is constantly comparing himself to others, and doesn't judge himself by the same standards as he does others. I think Henry is envious of his friends. The only thing the tattered man wanted is warm pea soup and a warm bed, but he wants to survive to be there for his children. I think Henry admires the tattered man's selflessness and courage, he never really complained abo...
Henry’s motivation for being at war surely differs from Tim’s motivation for being at war. Henry’s thoughts give us insight into his motives as to serving in war; he doesn’t value the moral reasons for serving in the war. Instead, Henry is very motivated to acquire a praiseworthy reputation as a war hero. In order to boost his own self-esteem when running away from the battle, Henry actually criticizes and mocks those who decided to stay. Returning to camp, Henry lies about how he got the wound that he has. Henry continuously acts pompous, and acts as if he is entitled to praise for his war heroism. Later, though, Henry redeems himself when he is deeply involved in a battle, and explains that he no longer is seeking praise for his war efforts. He is then, ironically, praised for being one of the best in the regiment. Throughout the novel, we see Henry’s growth and how he actually learns from his mistakes. Tim O’Brien received a full scholarship to study at Harvard, when receiving a draft notice that he was selected to serve in the army. He, in contrast to Henry, decided to go to war because he didn’t want to seem weak in deciding to do otherwise considering that others such as Rat Kiley, Azar, Kiowa, and Sanders have already spent some time in Vietnam. He also is influenced to participate in the war because he believes that in doing so, he will be helping his family and
In the first part of the novel, Henry is a youth that is very inexperienced. His motives were impure. He was a very selfish and self-serving character. He enters the war not for the basis of serving his country, but for the attainment of glory and prestige. Henry wants to be a hero. This represents the natural human characteristic of selfishness. Humans have a want and a need to satisfy themselves. This was Henry's main motive throughout the first part of the novel. On more than one occasion Henry is resolved to that natural selfishness of human beings. After Henry realizes that the attainment of glory and heroism has a price on it. That price is by wounds or worse yet, death. Henry then becomes self-serving in the fact that he wants to survive for himself, not the Union army. There is many a time when Henry wants to justify his natural fear of death. He is at a point where he is questioning deserting the battle; in order to justify this, he asks Jim, the tall soldier, if he would run. Jim declared that he'd thought about it. Surely, thought Henry, if his companion ran, it would be alright if he himself ran. During the battle, when Henry actually did take flight, he justified this selfish deed—selfish in the fact that it did not help his regiment hold the Rebs—by natural instinct. He proclaimed to himself that if a squirrel took flight when a rock was thrown at it, it was alright that he ran when his life was on the line.
In the Historical fiction, “The Red Badge of Courage”, written by Stephen Crane; a young man try’s to find courage in himself in the time of war. After watching your commander die in war, would you stay and fight or return home and be a coward? Enlisting Himself into war Henry, to be more than the common man to prove worthyness and bravery. With the sergeant dead will Henry lead his men to victory, or withdraw his men in war. Not being the only are faced with the decision Jim and Wilson Henry’s platoons will have the same decision.
Bloom, Harold, ed. Modern Critical Interpretations: Stephan Crane's The Red Badge of Courage. New Yourk: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987.
The difficult association between the occurrence of war and storytelling is told through the eyes of Tim O’Brien; he explains that a true war story has a supreme adherence to offensiveness that provides a sense of pride and courage commonly found in storytelling. “The thing about a story is that you dream it as you tell it, hoping that others might then dream along with you, and in this way memory and im...
At the beginning, Henry Fleming has an undeveloped identity because his inexperience limits his understanding of heroism, manhood, and courage. For example, on the way to war, “The regiment was fed and caressed at station after station until the youth [Henry] had believed that he must be a hero” (Crane 13). Since he has yet to fight in war, Henry believes a hero is defined by what others think of him and not what he actually does. The most heroic thing he has done so far is enlist, but even that was with ulterior motives; he assumes fighting in the war will bring him glory, yet another object of others’ opinions. At this point, what he thinks of himself is much less important than how the public perceives him. As a result of not understanding
Henry's final step in maturation was finally made through the sacrifice of his companions, and their pressuring him to lead the charge. The reaction of one soldier to another is the basis of war, as camaraderie is the methodology by which wars are won. Henry gave witness to the horrors of war, the atrocities of battle, the deaths of his friends, and later a life of victory. The ultimate transformation in Henry's character leading to a mature temperament was found by finding himself in the confusion of war and companionship.
113-117. Modern Critical Interpretations: Stephan Crane's The Red Badge of Courage. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987. Cody, Edwin H. Stephen Crane. Revised Edition.