Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the history of musical theatre
Essays on the history of musical theatre
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The famous Australian director that is Baz Luhrmann has a modern cinematic eye, therefore always evolving, keeping up with the modern generation and most importantly writing for the modern generation. “The Great Gatsby” and “Strictly Ballroom” depicts the constant changing and conforming along with the development of music and fashion. “Strictly Ballroom’ and “The Great Gatsby” are best known for their eclectic music and intricate, yet extravagant clothing. Luhrmann ensures that both clothing and music are constantly developing. In “Strictly Ballroom” the first scene is a dance competition surrounded by dazzlingly colourful outfits to show the tone of this scene. Similarly to the glitter stemmed costumes at Gatsby’s first party that Nick Carraway is invited to. These two scenes corroborate as they give the audience an idea of how spectacular and out there Lurhmann’s films are. His costumes are the epitome of “go big or go home” Baz certainly goes big in both films always making sure that he delivers that immoderate and free-spending types of props and costumes throughout. …show more content…
“Strictly Ballroom” and “The Great Gatsby” are both a form of entertainment to both the characters and the audience.
Luhrmann has chosen to allow the audience to become more involved in every aspect of the film. Going from the Grand Prix Pacific’s where we are the audience watching Scott and Fran dance with their exuberant dance moves, them being a form of entertainment to being taken inside of Gatsby’s parties which offers us a chance in which we peer more into the lives of characters and feel as though we, ourselves are more present than at a dance competition in ‘Strictly Ballroom.” Baz has gone over and above in the past years to ensure the modern audience are locked onto the
screen. The music throughout Luhrmann’s films is also one that is highly prominent and which portrays Luhrmann’s evolution explicitly. Jay Z played a role within the production of music in ‘‘The Great Gatsby”, displaying the African American jazz in order to bring the “modern’ aspect into play mixing with the Jazz that Fitzgerald had written in his book during his time. Music is also an important way in which you are consumed into the movie experiencing a taste of what the story line is about as well as the characters. In Strictly Ballroom the music played very much fits in with almost, all scenes. For example, where Scott and Fran were dancing in front of the coco cola sign along with the song ‘Time After Time” shows that they are on their way to becoming dance partners, portrayed by the lyrics of the song. Luhrmann has evolved in this manner always ensuring that the music grows with each character as well as being fitting with the film and the time frame in which it was made. The large amount of simultaneously bright and beautiful costumes, over the top and energetic tone and kaleidoscope editing from the Grand Prix Pacific’s in Strictly Ballroom to Gatsby luxurious parties both show exuberant choreography and garish costumes. Luhrmann went so far as in his evolution to tackle a more contemporary cinematic technique showing ‘The Great Gatsby’ in 3D. This is a way of enhancing a more powerful connection with the modern audience which is a development on from “Strictly Ballroom” Despite the fact that Baz Luhrmann is a modernist he never makes things more modern, in a sense that it takes the meaning out of it, he purely makes sure that all references made are accessible to a contemporary audience in which he directs his films. Through this, his evolution is portrayed in a way that is incessant and interminable.
All stories have the same blueprint structure with the same type of ending whether it be good triumphs over evil, rags to riches, the voyage and the return, tragedy, or rebirth. The thing that sets these stories apart is the message they intend to in our minds. “ The power of a story to shift and show itself to anew is part of what attracts people to it, at different ages, in different moods, with different concerns” (Auxier 7). These messages are given by the characters in the story that all have their own reasoning but in the end have one meaning behind it. Some messages give specified personal messages rather than a broad stated such as the stories The Wizard of Oz and The Great Gatsby. Blinded by the ignorance of desires, the characters
F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel, “The Great Gatsby”, and Baz Luhrmann’s film, “The Great Gatsby”, both have similarities and contrasts between the two of them. The Great Gatsby is a novel and film taken place in the 1920s filled with wild parties, mysterious people, The American Dream, and most of all, love. There are several things that can be compared between the novel and film; such as the characters and the setting. There are also contrasts between the two as well; which is mainly involving the character Nick.
It is a given that every piece of work that people read will contain all sorts of characters. Those characters can range from villains, victims, or venerables. Two pieces of work that easily portray those types of characters is in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel, The Great Gatsby, and in Arthur Miller’s tragedy, The Crucible. It is revealed to the readers that Mr. Wilson in The Great Gatsby takes the role of the victim because of the how he was lied too and deceived throughout the entirety of the novel, and in the end died from it. Also, in The Great Gatsby, Daisy Buchanan is almost an undercover villain. It is not revealed to most, but by speculating on her actions she does some things that prove her to be a villain. Lastly, in The Crucible Giles Corey comes off as a venerable,
The Great Gatsby has various parallels to Of Mice And Men. The central characters in both books are dreamers. They desire to achieve a certain goal. During these times people longed for what is recognized as the American dream. Gatsby wanted to be rich and live with the love of his life. Lennie and George wished for a ranch where they could live the way they fancied.
The Great Gatsby, directed by Baz Luhrmann, as Nick Caraway, a character, narrates. In the movie, Nick is there as a bystander, simply going along with the swift movements made by his mentor, Jay Gatsby. Woody Allen directs A Midnight in Paris, which is about Gil Wilson and his journey to the golden age, or the 1920’s, alongside Scott Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway, and Gertrude Stein. Allen’s movie portrays an altered character development through parallels in comparison to The Great Gatsby. Wilson’s actions parallel Caraway and Gatsby, opposite to Wilson’s journey, Nick and Gatsby is never led to the full comprehension of nostalgia.
Novels are very unique things to read. They contain so much detail and information it’s almost hard to comprehend. Sometimes these unique novels are translated into movies and while most movies disappoint the reader by not capturing the complete essence of the novel, I felt that The Great Gatsby did not disappoint. Sure, there are some differences between the two but not enough to make the movie a complete disappointment. In this essay, I will begin by comparing the two together, the two being the novel and movie, then I will gradually move in the contrast of this essay.
In One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (1975) The character McMurphy as played by Jack Nicholson, McMurphy’s is a criminal who is troubled and keeps being defiant. Instead of pleading guilty, McMurphy pleads insanity and then lands inside a mental hospital. Murphy reasons that being imprisoned within the hospital will be just as bad as being locked up in prison until he starts enjoying being within by messing around with other staff and patients. In the staff, McMurphy continuously irritates Nurse Ratched. You can see how it builds up to a control problem between the inmates and staff. Nurse Ratched is seen as the “institution” and it is McMurphy’s whole goal to rebel against that institution that she makes herself out to be.The other inmates view McMurphy like he is god. He gives the inmates reason to
I believe that Jay Gatsby and Othello’s inability to face the truth lead to their tragic consequences, but in real life I believe it is not the case. The Great Gatsby and ‘Othello’ are both stories beautifully constructed by William Shakespeare and F. Scott Fitzgerald. I believe that the refusal to face the truth for Gatsby and Othello, was definitely an element used by the authors to construct them as tragic protagonists.
Imagine. You are sitting in complete silence, even the nearby crickets won't dare to let out even the slightest of croaks. You stare down at your cluttered, dimly lit desk. Your hand grasps your pen, and the other rubs back and forth across your temple in angst. Your eyes pass over each paper, containing each incomplete thought, and your mind floods with memories of your past. Trapped by writer’s block, you are all alone with only your experiences, surroundings, and philosophy aiding you in the fall that is the dark reality of alcoholism and depression. For renowned authors F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway, these influences all played a crucial role in identifying their style techniques, as well as determining similarities and differences
Antagonists often offer a powerful contribution to various pieces of literature. Stanley Kowalski, in “A Streetcar Named Desire” by Tennessee Williams, and Tom Buchanan, in “The Great Gatsby”, both act as valid and powerful antagonists in their respective texts. These two characters share the need to find out the truth about the protagonists of the novels. They both are considered dominant, violent and strong men. They share the trait of honesty, but lack a sense of morality. Although there are evident differences regarding the social class of these two characters, they rightfully serve as similar characters. Both authors used very similar character traits to prove that despite the domineering and abusive mannerisms-characteristics of these
In both Frankenstein and The Great Gatsby, the protagonists fall into a life of despair and pain because of their unwavering obsession with their respective subjects. Jay Gatsby is infatuated with a rich married girl named Daisy, whom he only knew for a short time before he went to fight in the war. Upon his return, Gatsby does everything in his power to draw Daisy back in and achieve his ultimate goal of having her as his own despite the many obstacles in his way. His persistence does not come without a price, however. Victor Frankenstein is obsessed with becoming a legend and hero in the scientific world. He believes that he is a greater being than the rest of humankind and that he has immense power. Because of his deep desire to meet his full potential, he pushes the boundaries of his own morals and integrity. The consequences of his irresponsibility are bloody and heartbreaking. While Frankenstein’s infatuation stems from his narcissism and Gatsby’s from his idealism, both character’s egotism and superficiality contribute greatly to their uncontrollable, downward spiral into an obsession; their respective
The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, and Pride and Prejudice, by Jane Austen, display the customs and beliefs of past society. Both novels project the idea of wealth and high-class but also accentuate the search for love. Fitzgerald emphasizes the harm in devoting one’s life to achieving wealth for the one he loves, as Gatsby believes in order to win over Daisy he must acquire a great deal of money. Austen displays the importance of love over looks and money. She details the happiness Elizabeth is able to receive once she marries the guy who has similar wit and sarcasm. Although the novels were written a century apart, Pride and Prejudice and The Great Gatsby encompass similar ideologies, along with people and beliefs, of the time.
Fences and The Great Gatsby both have many characters that plays a significant role in the story. Both stories also have characters in the story that has changed due to the past or are changing throughout the story. There were many character changes in The Great Gatsby and Fences. For example, Troy leaving his family as a kid due to his father kicking him out the house at the age fourteen. This was a major change for Troy, because this act made Troy treat his family an unusual way people would usually treat their love ones. Troy is the protagonist in the book Fences. Troy is the father of Lyons and Cory, and husband of Rose. Switching to some examples from the Great Gatsby is when Daisy loved Gatsby during the war, then started to love someone
... movie stars like royalty or mythical gods and goddesses, viewing the drama between great archetypal characters in a personal psychic realm. By considering the statements made and their societal impact from a Marxist perspective, Benjamin’s method is highly effective, as it does not simply consider art in terms of pure aesthetics anymore, but considers art’s place in a society capable of mechanically reproducing and endlessly duplicating film, photography, and digital art. His qualm with losing the aura and mystique of an original work is negated by the cult of movie stars, the adoration of fame, the incorporation of soundtracks which embody a particular time period, cinematographic allusions, and time-capsule-like qualities of a film such as Basquiat, a 90s tribute to the 80s, produced both as a part of and resulting from the art movements and trends it addresses.
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald and The Glass Menagerie by Tennessee Williams share and explore themes and techniques of imprisonment, by both mental and physical means. To explore imprisonment, both writers use characters and narration techniques to express themes of illusion and reality by characterisation, the American Dream in symbolism, and entrapment by responsibility through narration structure. While both authors express a story, Tennessee Williams uses play direction, while F. Scott Fitzgerald uses novel structure to convey the ideas of imprisonment.