Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Truman capotes in cold blood rhetorical analysis
Truman capotes in cold blood rhetorical analysis
Truman capotes in cold blood rhetorical analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Truman capotes in cold blood rhetorical analysis
Throughout his nonfiction novel In Cold Blood, Truman Capote continuously contrasts the kindheartedness and innocence of the Clutters to the malicious, manipulative demeanor of Dick Hickock and Perry Smith to emphasize the cold, cruel nature of their crime. By harshly interrupting peaceful, endearing images of Nancy Clutter baking a pie with descriptions of Dick and Perry planning the town darling’s very murder, Capote consistently juxtaposes good and evil. His tactic descriptions of the seemingly discordant yet parallel occurrences in different settings and employment of strong imagery and pathos throughout the novel prove effective in not only developing characterization and appealing to the reader’s emotions but building the contrast between good and evil that …show more content…
would prove critical in determining the innocence and moral character of Hickock and Smith later on in the novel. Capote employs vivid imagery and powerful detail in the first passage to assert the innocence of Nancy Clutter and thus juxtapose her purity with Hickock and Smith’s guile and deceptive nature. Images of teddy bears strewn across the pink and white room that would not much later be splattered with her own blood emphasize Nancy’s chaste, childlike innocence. Furthermore, descriptions of countless photographs and memories enforce Capote’s characterization of Nancy as well-loved and personable and thus emphasize the grief felt by her loved ones even months after her death. Capote’s imagery and carefully-selected details also emphasize Nancy’s amiable normalcy; despite her notoriety as an almost unusually generous, good-natured model student, descriptions of lake vacations and picnics allow the reader to relate to her charming, amiable character. Her room is orderly and organized, illustrating the uncompromising control she had of her incredibly busy life until it was snatched away from her. In addition, the details and imagery add nsight into her daily life and habitual nightly routine, thus further developing her character. Capote’s use of pathos in establishing “town darling” Nancy Clutter as a driven, kindhearted all-A student who only allowed herself to be “selfish and vain” during the midnight hours starkly contrasts Hickock’s carnal impulses of lust, greed, and self-indulgence and appeals to the reader’s emotions.
By immediately introducing her as a completely normal and remarkably kind-hearted girl, the reader is later on more affected by her brutal death than if she had been introduced in another light. The description of her lifestyle also emphasizes the sudden unexpectedness of the murders; no one expected a brutal murder in Holcomb, let alone the brutal murder of a girl like Nancy Clutter of all people. The seemingly insignificant details surrounding her handwriting and her developing maturity also make the reader sympathize with Nancy as she was murdered in the middle of her teenage years, right as she was beginning to understand herself and think about her future; her diary, meant to be read in the distant future, symbolized the future she’d never have. The image of Nancy setting out the dress she would eventually be buried in evokes sympathy in the reader as well and emphasizes the lost potential in Nancy’s
life. The passage is one of the most descriptive regarding the members of the Clutter family and one of the last before the novel shifts absolute focus on their murders and a tone of fatalism is established. Though Nancy Clutter isn’t exactly considered a major character in the novel, she plays an important role in contrasting Hickock and Smith and appealing to the reader’s emotions. She is vital to achieving Capote’s purpose of making the reader understand that the Clutters were, in fact, killed “in cold blood.”
In Cold Blood is the true story of a multiple murder that rocked the small town of Holcomb, Kansas and neighboring communities in 1959. It begins by introducing the reader to an ideal, all-American family, the Clutters; Herb (the father), Bonnie (the mother), Nancy (the teenage daughter), and Kenyon (the teenage son). The Clutters were prominent members of their community who gained admiration and respect for their neighborly demeanors.
Throughout the first part of In Cold Blood, “The Last to See Them Alive,” the reader can find extensive descriptions of the characters and setting. Much of the first forty pages is Capote giving elaborate descriptions of the Clutters and of the Holcomb area. For example, Capote gives us insight on Nancy’s personality when one of the
Most people believe that everyone gets what they deserve. That all bad actions deserve consequences. To many, that is what the so-called “justice” system is for. Criminals are supposed to be punished by the law, but is it always fair to the criminals? What if one of those criminals had an awful life growing up and just was unable to stay out of trouble? It is just this question that Truman Capote addresses in his book, In Cold Blood. Throughout the book, Capote creates sympathy for Perry Smith while claiming the justice system is flawed in the way it punishes the wrong people.
Richard Mulcaster, a British instructor of English, once wrote, “Nature makes the boy toward, nurture sees him forward.” Mulcaster recognizes that both genetic and environmental factors determine the type of a person one becomes. Truman Capote’s nonfiction novel, In Cold Blood gives the reader an opportunity to see prime examples of how nature and nurture influence one’s character. Capote’s novel, In Cold Blood introduces the reader to two men; Richard Eugene Hickock known as Dick throughout the novel, and Perry Edward Smith whose lives of crime are almost identical; although both Perry and Richard come from very humble backgrounds, their childhood particularly their family life, has very little in common. It is not until later in their lives that we begin to see similarities between the two men. Despite their differences, Perry’s upbringing and Dick’s genetic disposition allow both men to share a disregard for life, which becomes apparent on the night they gruesomely burglarized and murdered four innocent members of the Clutter family.
This passage when Capote begins to introduce Perry more in depth. From his childhood to later on in his life. Perry’s way of life as a child was a tough one, in which his mother put him in a “catholic orphanage. The one where the Black Widows were always at me. Hitting me. Because of wetting the bed…They hated me, too.” Capote’s use of short sentence syntax creates the effect of emphasizing the horrible and dramatic conditions Perry had to live with. Also, the nuns of the orphanage are described as “Black Widows,” a metaphor, to make it seem like it was truly terrible. The color black associates with death and when metaphorically used to describe a nun, it creates sympathy for Perry. Later in the passage, capote creates a short narrative of Perry’s experience in war. “Perry, one balmy evening in wartime 1945…” The storytelling helps understand more about Perry in the way he thinks and acts. The atmosphere of this passage is a sad mood. It talks about the terrible childhood and early life of Perry. It is clear that no one ever cared for Perry and it affected him dramatically.
In the novel, In Cold Blood, Truman Capote sculpts a plot that leaves the reader with a dark, tingling sensation of suspense despite the reader’s foreknowledge of events. He electrifies the passage using precise imagery, selective perspective/point of view, and cold-blooded foreshadowing.
and at one point, had a gun pointed to his head. Also there appears to be
Truman Capote showcases his very distinct style of writing in his true crime novel, In Cold Blood. Capote intentionally frames ruthless murderer Perry Smith as a relatable, well-intentioned human throughout the whole novel, and employs various rhetorical devices to show us that Perry is not just a stone cold killer. Specifically, Capote uses diction comprised of complex words, interviews conducted by Capote personally in which he interacted with the suspects and their loved ones, and sentence structure that came off as very to the point, in order to illustrate Perry’s dynamic and unique personality, opposed to the one dimensional heartless murderer many made him out to be.
The detailed account of the killers’ childhoods makes the reader sympathize with the Clutter family’s killers Smith and Hickock. Should they reserve the death penalty? Did Truman Capote take a stand on the death penalty? By giving the reader a detailed account of Perry Smith’s and Dick Hickock’s childhood, Capote sets up the reader for a nurture vs. nature debate on the death penalty. The question then becomes, do the effects (if any) caused by environment in childhood make for a trained killer or a natural born one?
Truman Capote finds different ways to humanize the killers throughout his novel In Cold Blood. He begins this novel by explaining the town of Holcomb and the Clutter family. He makes them an honest, loving, wholesome family that play a central role in the town. They play a prominent role in everyone’s lives to create better well-being and opportunity. Capote ends his beginning explanation of the plot by saying, “The suffering. The horror. They were dead. A whole family. Gentle, kindly people, people I knew --- murdered. You had to believe it, because it was really true” (Capote 66). Despite their kindness to the town, someone had the mental drive to murder them. Only a monster could do such a thing --- a mindless beast. However,
The film Capote, based on the how the writer of “In Cold Blood” did his research to write his book, a masterpiece of literature, has portrayed Capote’s behavior during his research vividly. Capote’s behavior during the years Perry waits on death row in order to get personal testimony of the night of killings is a controversial topic. Some argue that what Capote did was absolutely necessary for an ambitious writer to create such a master piece while other argue that human ethics is more important than the creation of an ideal “non-fiction noble” and the paths he took to get there are morally ambiguous. Even though he gave the world a milestone in literature, his behaviors seem unethical because he lied, pretended to be a friend of an accused murderer who was in a death row, and did not have any empathy to him.
In Truman Capote’s non-fiction novel In Cold Blood, the Clutter family’s murderers, Perry Smith and Dick Hickock, are exposed like never before. The novel allows the reader to experience an intimate understanding of the murderer’s pasts, thoughts, and feelings. It goes into great detail of Smith and Hickock’s pasts which helps to explain the path of life they were walking leading up to the murder’s, as well as the thought’s that were running through their minds after the killings.
In the nonfiction novel, “In Cold Blood” by Truman Capote, the author tells a story of the murderers and victims of a slaughter case in Holcomb, Kansas. Instead of writing a book on the murder case as a crime report, the author decides to write about the people. The people we learn about are the killers, Dick and Perry, and the murdered family, the Clutters. The author describes how each family was and makes the portrayals of Dick and Perry’s family different from the Clutters.The portrayal of the Clutters and of Dick and Perry’s families, was used to describe what the American Dream was for each character. In the beginning we learn about what type of family the Clutters were and how they represented the American Dream for the people of Holcomb.
Capote's structure in In Cold Blood is a subject that deserves discussion. The book is told from two alternating perspectives, that of the Clutter family who are the victims, and that of the two murderers, Dick Hickock and Perry Smith. The different perspectives allow the reader to relive both sides of the story; Capote presents them without bias. Capote masterfully utilizes the third person omniscient point of view to express the two perspectives. The non-chronological sequencing of some events emphasizes key scenes.
Nance indicates that “In Cold Blood” was written as a “genuine enlargement of Truman’s artistic scope; a vindication of his own imagination” in an article called, “The Words of Truman Capote”. Nance also criticizes that Perry Smith resembles protagonists from alternative stories and that there are also sufferers and dreamers in, “In Cold Blood”. Nance explains that Truman’s most influential deviation is the “brain explosion” in which he reaches out at the father figure. He increases his criticism by adding that “In Cold Blood” is to some extent a, “return to Capote’s childhood and a real-life confirmation of his earliest imaginative creations, it’s technique, artistic and ideological presuppositions are the most predictable consequences that he began to capture in the second phase of his career.” William says that “In Cold Blood” was not a tragic drama but instead a meditation on reality.