In Cold Blood Rhetorical Analysis

700 Words2 Pages

Truman Capote showcases his very distinct style of writing in his true crime novel, In Cold Blood. Capote intentionally frames ruthless murderer Perry Smith as a relatable, well-intentioned human throughout the whole novel, and employs various rhetorical devices to show us that Perry is not just a stone cold killer. Specifically, Capote uses diction comprised of complex words, interviews conducted by Capote personally in which he interacted with the suspects and their loved ones, and sentence structure that came off as very to the point, in order to illustrate Perry’s dynamic and unique personality, opposed to the one dimensional heartless murderer many made him out to be.
As In Cold Blood progresses, Capote slowly seems to discover the truth behind the murders and realize who Perry truly is. At first, Capote is debating whether or not Perry is the cold blooded killer everyone makes him out to be, or if his life choices were simply a product of his upbringing. Various quotes from Perry’s account of the killings show him both questioning himself and wanting to find a weapon. Capote’s description of Perry (for example, “He rubs his legs; the handcuffs rattle”) shows how nervous Perry is, and makes it seem as though he is having a hard …show more content…

He tries to show his readers that Perry was a killer brought about by his environment and upbringing. Whether that justifies Perry’s action or if the justice system should have lessened his sentence is what Capote leaves to the reader. Dick who was born with his need to kill, was a complete sociopath by nature. Using interviews from Dewey specifically brings about a perspective which is purely objective, and his use of complex and literal diction makes for a more emotionally detached novel. The short and concise syntax makes it seem as though Capote is confused and unable to make his own decision on Perry. All of these various things bring about the novel which is In Cold

Open Document