Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Truman Capote put-to-words a captivating tale of two monsters who committed four murders in cold blood. However, despite their atrocities, Capote still managed to sway his readers into a mood of compassion. Although, his tone may have transformed several times throughout the book, his overall purpose never altered.
Truman began the novel with a chapter of exposition. His main purpose of this segment was to describe the victims, which he did by writing in an ominous tone. This tone acting primarily as a foreshadowing of what the reader knew would come. Capote was heightening the suspense. The readers knew the Clutters would die, but the family lived blissfully oblivious of what was yet to come. Capote often executed this ominous tone by stating that it would be Mr. Clutters last day, or Nancy's last pie etc. This only heighted the anticipation, the tension, and of course the expectation of what was yet to come. Finally, nearing the end of the chapter, Capote continues with the ominous tone by switching viewpoints between the victims and the murders. As the actual murder grew closer, the viewpoints switched more rapidly. This gave the readers an almost simultaneous, birds-eye view of the Clutters' fate. Over all, this ominous tone definitely slanted in support for the victims. A reader could only find himself loathing the murderers who committed this monstrous crime. However, this loathing changes as the tone changes.
Capote transitions next into a reflective and somewhat didactic tone in the second chapter. The author begins to give the reader a more in-depth understanding of every character's situation and opinion. This chapter has a sequence of interviews with the townspeople which better illustrates the public ...
... middle of paper ...
...n who obviously showed no signs of knowing it themselves. Moreover, this was perhaps his primary purpose.
As stated, Capote frequently delved into the lives of the cold-blooded killers. He made it a point to illustrate all of the hardships that each of them chronically faced. In the beginning of the novel, Capote used his ominous tone to stir up hate toward the killers. However, by the end, his tone was completely solemn, somber, and even sorrowful. This might be to serve an underlying purpose. Perhaps Capote himself truly opposed the death penalty? Although Capote stressed so vehemently the horrors of the Clutters' cold-blooded murders, Capote was trying to convey that their murders were not the only ones committed in cold blood. He was stating that the death penalty was also a form of cold-blooded killing, one that served no other purpose besides revenge.
Capote’s structure throughout the entire book created an excellent backbone to tell the two alternating perspectives of the book that is of the victims; the clutter family and the murders; Dick Hickock and Perry Smith. This allowed Capote to not have a bias towards the accounts being told. The pattern of victims then the murderers causes an attractive puzzle where the reader collects an amount of information leading to the climax of the actual slaughter. He actually contin...
And finally, as the story concludes, you feel through Capote's careful presentation of the facts, that we are participants of the trial ourselves. We experience the witnesses testimony only when the jurors and spectators do so themselves. Having the author reserve vital information so that we learn only what the community learns, when they learn it, offers the opportunity for us to experience genuine emotions as the events unfold.
In the novel In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, the author skillfully orders information and articulates his word choice in order to successfully tell the story. Capote chooses to include certain events before others to show the reader the development of the case caused a change in the overall feelings of characters such as Alvin Dewey. Alvin, the detective who desperately searched for the Clutter killers reads, “on the first page of the Kansas City Star, a headline he had long awaited: Die On Rope For Bloody Crime,” which portrays to the reader that he was relieved after months to know that they were sentenced to death. (337) By including the word choice “he had long awaited” the reader may assume that he is pleased by this outcome. (337) However,
Imagine staring at a breathtaking landscape, where it feels like time could go on forever. Now, imagine being late for an important event where it feels like the clock will not stop ticking and the numbers move with every glance. With the sentiments of these two emotions in mind, Capote exemplifies both of the essences of these situations throughout In Cold Blood through his use of syntax. He can take the reader through his long and drawn-out syntax to describe settings or characters extensively, creating a timeless and descriptive scene; however, he also creates a change of pace at the climactic moments of the book by modifying his sentences to become shorter. Therefore, the syntax that Truman Capote uses throughout In Cold Blood is used to change the tone and pace of the story to help elevate the significance of the plot.
In this story he gives the murderers their own sense of self and showed how they choose to deal with their lives. This also lets readers know that each person was different and that neither of them truly knew how to “be normal”, as most people would say, and live their own lives without causing trouble. Pushing the reader to form an opinion, biased or not, with the information that was given about each character by Capote. Capote through this all, did a great job of bringing the murderers to life for his reader and sharing the stories of each person that may not have been said by the media or anything else that gives people information about the world that is around them. Giving these characters lives and experiences were great parts to the story and is what ultimately gave the book its
Truman Capote understood that using the right words and the right time can persuade readers to not only think as you think, but also make the audiences think deeper into the meanings of the words put in front of them. Using various rhetoric devices Capote sparked insight into Holcomb just by describing simple landmark buildings and the surroundings of the town. In one page the audience can completely grasp the concepts and emotions of the village.
Capote uses different voices to tell the story, creating an intimacy between the readers and the murders, the readers and the victims, and all the other players in this event—townspeople, investigators, friends of the family. This intimacy lead...
Truman Capote finds different ways to humanize the killers throughout his novel In Cold Blood. He begins this novel by explaining the town of Holcomb and the Clutter family. He makes them an honest, loving, wholesome family that play a central role in the town. They play a prominent role in everyone’s lives to create better well-being and opportunity. Capote ends his beginning explanation of the plot by saying, “The suffering. The horror. They were dead. A whole family. Gentle, kindly people, people I knew --- murdered. You had to believe it, because it was really true” (Capote 66). Despite their kindness to the town, someone had the mental drive to murder them. Only a monster could do such a thing --- a mindless beast. However,
He lied to Perry Smith and the police for his benefits. He lied to police because he said he would writing about how the murder had impacted the community, but he was writing about how the Clutter family was killed. Capote bribed a prison warren to attain access to Perry, a man involved in the Clutter family murder case. Moreover, Capote was writing a book with getting substantial information from the two men who were accused of brutal murder of an entire family at night, but he was hiding the title from the two killers. He wanted to make them believe that his writing was about their unjust trail. In a program, he said about the title of his book was “In Cold Blood” however when Perry asked him about it, he answered that he had to come up with the title and he gave it as a title, but that was not the real title. It seems clear that Capote’s behavior was questionable on how he attained access to Perry and how he lied to h...
In Truman Capote’s non-fiction novel In Cold Blood, the Clutter family’s murderers, Perry Smith and Dick Hickock, are exposed like never before. The novel allows the reader to experience an intimate understanding of the murderer’s pasts, thoughts, and feelings. It goes into great detail of Smith and Hickock’s pasts which helps to explain the path of life they were walking leading up to the murder’s, as well as the thought’s that were running through their minds after the killings.
Capote's structure in In Cold Blood is a subject that deserves discussion. The book is told from two alternating perspectives, that of the Clutter family who are the victims, and that of the two murderers, Dick Hickock and Perry Smith. The different perspectives allow the reader to relive both sides of the story; Capote presents them without bias. Capote masterfully utilizes the third person omniscient point of view to express the two perspectives. The non-chronological sequencing of some events emphasizes key scenes.
When he characterized the characters in the book some of his descriptions were not similar to the real historical records that existed. For example in the book the author wrote that Perry Smith “was tattooed on his right biceps” (pg. 32) while in records it says that his left hand was tattooed. This mistakes made people to claim that Capote was not the professional journalist and claimed that “he never remembered what the actual percentage of recall he had” (Jack Shafer). However, by claiming this fact people failed to take into account that the Capote used literary language in his writing that created the book to look almost like a novel. Capote included many literary elements in the novel that made it to accomplish a goal of New Journalism. For example, one of the literary elements that author used in the book is the foreshadowing. The foreshadowing helped the reader to get the clues about what will happen in the future of the book and kept them attractive to the story. Capote describes Herbert Clutter's day he says "Then touching the brim of his cap, he headed for home and the day's work, unaware that it would be his last"(pg. 13). This foreshadowing the characters last day in life and make the reader to be interesting what will happen later on. This helped the novel to look like the “masterpiece”
Not everything is always what it seems, looks to be the central idea throughout the novel. Capote constantly repeats people saying, such as the teacher of one of the victims, "Feeling wouldn't run half so high if this had happened to anyone except the Clutters." (pg. 197) Even the trial for prosecuting the murders wasn’t what it seemed- with the phycological evaluations of the murderers left out. Though this was at times frustrating to witness, it deepened my interest for wanting to know more, and
I do not think In Cold Blood is just journalism. I agree that this book is a creative work. Capote considers his work as a nonfiction novel which is a style of writing based on true story with additional dramatic techniques. I have read the real case that was written by the police department ("Clutter Family Murders."). It is so similar to In Cold Blood, that I even thought it was a summary of the book. It is apparent that Capote added some additional stories especially the part when Dick and Perry are planned to be executed. This addition was meant to tell the readers the hypocrisy of death penalty but other than that I thought Capote got easy credit for just re-writing the real crime. Obviously, the book concentrates a lot on the neighbors
Subject: This narrative novel retold the murders of the Clutter family conducted by Richard “Dick” Hickock and Perry Smith. The author retold these events as a non-fiction novel as new and creative way of expressing journalism. Throughout the first chapter, Capote kept mentioning the irony of the Clutter family not knowing that they were going to be killed despite how obvious it is. Later on, the novel