Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethics within frankenstein
Morality within frankenstein
Morality within frankenstein
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Tragedy has caused many drastic actions in fiction and nonfiction works. In Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the misfortune originates in the making of the creation and extends to all of its victims. Matthew Shepard’s untimely death affects the whole town of Laramie in The Laramie Project by Moises Kaufman. These tragedies have complicated the character’s lives with arguments, remorse, and shame. Both The Laramie Project and Frankenstein exemplify how tragedy causes guilt and controversy. In The Laramie Project, Russell Henderson and Aaron McKinney both commit a crime, but Russell Henderson has a guilty conscience. During the trial for Matthew Shepard’s murder Henderson says: There is not a moment that goes by that I don’t see what happened …show more content…
He explains his knowledge of his wrong doings, in effect to one day receive forgiveness from the town of Laramie and the Shepard family. Whereas in Frankenstein, the guilt does not prevail in the defendant, it exists in a false accusation. The court puts Justine Moritz on trial for the murder of William Frankenstein, but Victor Frankenstein knows his creation held responsibility. He says, I passed a night of unmingled wretchedness. In the morning I went to the court; my lips and throat were parched. I dared not ask the fatal question; but I was known, and the officer guessed the cause of my visit....I cannot pretend to describe what I felt. I had before experienced sensations of horror; and I have endeavoured to bestow upon them adequate expressions, but words cannot convey an idea of the heart sickening despair that I then endured. (Shelley 76) As Frankenstein returns to the court, the guilt burdens him because the court condemns Justine for a crime she does not commit. The tragedy of William’s death brings the burden of constant …show more content…
The death penalty has a very controversial stance in the world, and this applies to Laramie as well; Murray: Part of me wants McKinney to get it. But I’m not very proud of that. I was on and off, off and on. I can’t say what I would do... I’m too personally involved. Ula: How can I protest if the Shepards want McKinney dead? I just can’t interfere with that. But on a personal level, I knew Aaron in grade school. We never called him Aaron. He was called A.J...How can we put A.J. McKinney- how can we put A.J. McKinney to death?. (Kaufman 79-80) Whether or not Aaron McKinney should receive the death penalty for the murder of Matthew Shepard diverges in the Laramie Project. Marge Murray and Zubaida Ula display the dispute over McKinney’s fate. Controversy in Frankenstein on the other hand, involves Victor’s thoughts. He knows his creation caused so much harm and to make the same mistake twice would end badly. Upon returning to Geneva he says, Day after day, week after week, passed away on my return to Geneva; and I could not collect the courage to recommence my work. I feared the vengeance of the disappointed fiend, yet I was unable to overcome my repugnance to the task which was enjoined me”. (Shelley
Frankenstein is the story of an eccentric scientist whose masterful creation, a monster composed of sown together appendages of dead bodies, escapes and is now loose in the country. In Frankenstein, Mary Shelly’s diction enhances fear-provoking imagery in order to induce apprehension and suspense on the reader. Throughout this horrifying account, the reader is almost ‘told’ how to feel – generally a feeling of uneasiness or fright. The author’s diction makes the images throughout the story more vivid and dramatic, so dramatic that it can almost make you shudder.
Ever since the beginning of Frankenstein’s tragic narrative, his story has been filled with distortions. When happy, the world seems imbued with a mystical glow and when depressed, darkness threatens to conquer everything and everyone. However, as the story progresses, it becomes apparent that was not just the narrator who had a various distorted outlooks on the world, but other primary characters as well, including, but not limited to, Frankenstein’s monster and Frankenstein’s dear friend Henry Clerval.
Next, let’s look at the most crucial piece of evidence in this case: the locket. The family heirloom that William took with him on the night of his homicide that somehow ended up on the person of Justine Moritz. Once again, the defense has neglected to account for this. With this evidence alone, you, the jury, should convict Justine Moritz for the tragic murder of William Frankenstein. How could the locket have been in the possession of the defendant unless she had taken it from the corpse of William? And, if she had taken it from the corpse of William, she must have been the one to cause his death.
Critic Northrop Frye says, “Tragic heroes tower as the highest points in their human landscape that they seem the inevitable conductors of the power about them, the great trees more likely to be struck by lightning than a clump of grass. Conductors may of course be instruments as well as victims of the divine lightning”. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein greatly exhibits the theme of the consequence of knowledge and irresponsibility among others through its tragic hero, Victor Frankenstein. Northrop Frye’s quote is certainly true when looking at Frankenstein’s situation. Victor is a victim of his divine lightning, and ultimately causes much trouble for himself; however, Victor also serves as the tragic hero in the lives of the monster, his family, and his friends.
The novel’s protagonist, Victor Frankenstein, emphasizes the importance of having an identity by exemplifying the dissatisfaction that accompanies contorted character-to-character relations. What makes his relationships particularly perverse however, is Victor himself as a person and family member. Often, male “participants in a moral conflict,” such as Victor, “may invoke ‘justice’ and insist on theoretical objectivity” to avoid taking responsibility for their actions, c...
Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, has captured people’s attention since it was first written. People often wonder how much of Mary Shelley’s life is documented in her novel. From the theme of parental abandonment, to the theme of life and death in the novel, literary scholars have been able to find similarities between Frankenstein and Shelley’s life. The Journal of Religion and Health, the Journal of Analytical Psychology, and the Modern Psychoanalysis discuss the different connections between Shelley’s life and Frankenstein. Badalamenti, the author of “ Why did Mary Shelley Write Frankenstein?” in the Journal of Religion and Health, primarily discusses the connection between Victor
After learning about the life of Mary Shelley, I have grown to appreciate the novel, Frankenstein, even more since the first time I read it. She led a life nearly, as tragic as the monster she created through her writing. Mary seems to pull some of her own life experiences in Victor’s background, as in both mothers died during or after childbirth. Learning about Mary’s personal losses, I have gained a better appreciation of her as an author and a woman of the 17th century. She had association with some the most influential minds of that
Tragedy shows no discrimination and often strikes down on those undeserving of such turmoil. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, a creature more repulsive than one can imagine is brought to life by a young scientist. Although this creature is horrifying in sight, he is gentle by nature. Unfortunately, the softer side of the creature is repeatedly overlooked and the so called “monster” is driven to a breaking point. Even though the Creature committed many crimes, Mary Shelley’s Creature was the tragic hero of this story because of his efforts rescue the life of a young girl and helping destitute cottagers.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a nineteenth century literary work that delves into the world of science and the plausible outcomes of morally insensitive technological research. Although the novel brings to the forefront several issues about knowledge and sublime nature, the novel mostly explores the psychological and physical journey of two complex characters. While each character exhibits several interesting traits that range from passive and contemplative to rash and impulsive, their most attractive quality is their monstrosity. Their monstrosities, however, differ in the way each of the character’s act and respond to their environment. Throughout Frankenstein, one assumes that Frankenstein’s creation is the true monster. While the creation’s actions are indeed monstrous, one must also realize that his creator, Victor Frankenstein is also a villain. His inconsiderate and selfish acts as well as his passion for science result in the death of his friend and family members and ultimately in his own demise.
The creator of the monster, Victor Frankenstein is a man full of knowledge and has a strong passion for science. He pushes the boundary of science and creates a monster. Knowledge can be a threat when used for evil purposes. Though Victor did not intend for the being to be evil, society’s judgement on the monster greatly affects him. As a result he develops hatred for his creator as well as all man-kind. Victor’s anguish for the loss of his family facilitates his plan for revenge to the monster whom is the murderer. While traveling on Robert Walton’s ship he and Victor continue their pursuit of the monster. As Victor’s death nears he says, “…or must I die, and he yet live? If I do, swear to me Walton, that he shall not escape, that you will seek him and satisfy my vengeance in his death…Yet, when I am dead if he should appear, if the ministers of vengeance should conduct him to you, swear that he shall not live-swear that he shall not triumph over my accumulated woes and survive to add to the list of his dark crimes” (pg.199). Victor grieves the death of William, Justine, Clerval, Elizabeth and his father. Throughout the novel he experiences the five stages of grief, denial/ isolation, anger, bargaining, depression and finally acceptance. Victor denies ...
"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer (Blackstone)." This quote explains how a proper court case is viewed, but what if there was a confession? In Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, that’s exactly what happens to Justine; some planted evidence and then a false confession. In her book, it forces us to complete the role of God in a struggle of justice. Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein expresses the belief that religious knowledge will overcome the courts system, regardless of evidence. The one theme of knowledge in Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein is people believe religious knowledge will overcome the court knowledge. This theme of knowledge is demonstrated by the court case of William,
Victor Frankenstein, the monster’s creator, is the victim of his own pride. An ego unchecked is a dangerous thing. But in truth, it really just shows Victor’s humanity. He is privileged, educated, talented, loved, adored, but he is not perfect. His flaw is his own ego and pride. Without doubt, this is the result of a childhood where he was overindulged. Overindulged to the extent he was given a little girl “Elizabeth” as a “present”, whom he considered from childhood “mine only” (Shelley 21). Little wonder the twenty year old Victor would think he could create, control and command life. But Victor as with any indulged child did not take the time to learn much from his parents about parenting and fath...
After hearing the monster’s side of the story Frankenstein started to show some compassion for the being and agreed to it’s desire for a mate. Now that Frankenstein has learned the full story of his creation he feels the need to take responsibility for it now with the line, “did [he] not as his maker owe him all portions of happiness” (Shelley 125), less the monster start to attack humanity out of
Frankenstein ran away from his “beautiful” living obsession and was struck by great grief, “ … the commencement of a nervous fever which confined me for several months.” (47) Frankenstein kept encountering his creation which reminded him of the horrors he created and death tolls steadily rose, causing him to mentally self-destruct, “I was seized by remorse and the sense of guilt, which hurried me away to a hell of intense tortures such as no language can describe.” (77) Thoughts about suicide often raced through Frankenstein's mind, showing self-destruction on his mental state, “ often, I say, I was tempted to plunge into the silent lake, that the waters might close over me and my calamities forever.”
Victor Frankenstein was an obsessed scientist that was changing from a normal guy in college that hangs out with his friends but as he started to study the creation of life he becomes more morbid than mad. He studied everything about life and took in everything that his professors taught him. He took himself from his family and friends and stayed locked away plaining and creating which made his behavior change. Victor behavior was more obsessed with creating life which made him look like a mad scientist. He wasn’t mad at he was just fascinated with creating a living monster.