Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mary shelleys frankenstein and religion
Mary shelleys frankenstein and religion
Mary shelleys frankenstein and religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mary shelleys frankenstein and religion
Knowledge of Religion and Frankenstein
"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer (Blackstone)." This quote explains how a proper court case is viewed, but what if there was a confession? In Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, that’s exactly what happens to Justine; some planted evidence and then a false confession. In her book, it forces us to complete the role of God in a struggle of justice. Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein expresses the belief that religious knowledge will overcome the courts system, regardless of evidence. The one theme of knowledge in Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein is people believe religious knowledge will overcome the court knowledge. This theme of knowledge is demonstrated by the court case of William,
This relates to the overall theme that people believe in a religious knowledge over the knowledge of the court. In Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein it states, “’God knows,’ she said, ‘how entirely I am innocent. But I do not pretend that my protestations should acquit me: I rest my innocence on a plain and simple explanation of the facts which have been adduced against me; and I hope the character I have always borne will incline my judges to a favourable interpretation, where any circumstance appears doubtful or suspicious.’(Shelly, 104)" The first part of this quote suggests who the true judge of Justine is. God has ultimate power over Justine and her future. It also suggests that God’s knowledge will overcome the evidence of the court. Religious knowledge is valued over the courts knowledge. Justine is extremely religious and believes that a correct jury conviction will come because she believes God will allow the correct thing to happen. She holds that God’s knowledge will overcome any court evidence and knowledge. The theme that people believe that a religious knowledge is superior to the court system is connected to Justine’s conversation with Elizabeth because she believes God, innocence, and good moral standing will overcome the court evidence and allow her a
Elizabeth, upset, expresses the values of religion, and how she believes God’s knowledge will overcome the courts guilty verdict. In Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein Elizabeth says, "’Oh, Justine!’ said she, ‘why did you rob me of my last consolation? I relied on your innocence; and although I was then very wretched, I was not so miserable as I am now.’[…] ‘Rise, my poor girl,’ said Elizabeth, ‘why do you kneel, if you are innocent? I am not one of your enemies; I believed you guiltless, notwithstanding every evidence, until I heard that you had yourself declared your guilt. That report, you say, is false; and be assured, dear Justine, that nothing can shake my confidence in you for a moment, but your own confession.’ (Shelly, 107)" This quote discusses the value of forgiveness in this society, as well as the value of God by Elizabeth. By falsely admitting to the crime, Justine has made Elizabeth look stupid in front of her peers, yet it is not even a question for Elizabeth to forgive her. It also explores an idea that innocence in God’s eye is better than such in the courts eyes. Elizabeth is incredibly caring for people, specifically Justine, although she was devastated by Justine’s confession to William’s murder. Religious knowledge is more valuable than a jury’s verdict and that value is connected to Elizabeth’s feelings on Justine because Elizabeth does not believe in the guilty verdict by
Being such a narrative, when I was reading about the details of Kate’s attacks I was actually scared. It gave a sense of spookiness to the book that I hoped for. I remember visiting the city of Salem, and the same chills I had walking through the town was relived while reading the book. However one difference about this book compared to the historical teachings of Salem was that in Kate’s trail it was less of a he said she said event and more on the cold hard facts. In GodBeer testimony, he examines much of what Jonathan Selleck notes on how to determine a witch is guilty because he knew how serious of an offense it truly was. I sometimes found myself wondering if this was a fictional story because of how elaborate it was or however, when he used experts from documents such as the petition for Elizabeth Clawson. The last two chapters is much about the trial process than I expected, which helped me to understand this book as a narrative with much historical
Both syntax and diction were largely presented as Polly Baker threw rhetorical questions of why she was being punished legally if it was only supposed to be a religious punishment. Even including that God, himself, helped make her children, even though it was a crime to have children without being married, and her children nicknamed, “Bastard Children.” When all put together “The Speech of Miss Polly Baker” creates a passionate tone that is fighting against the injustice of the judicial system at that
A basic sense of honesty is another of Mary Warren’s traits. In Act I she goes to Salem to convince Abigail to tell the truth about what really happened in the woods. When the witchcraft scare gets out of hand, Mary joins Abigail and the other girls in falsely accusing women of being witches. These false accusations are motivated by hysteria. There is evidence that Mary really believes that the women in court are bewitching her. She tells the judge that she thought she saw spirits. The other girls were screaming, and before she knew it, Mary was screaming with them. When she realizes that there are no spirits, Mary is willing to be truthful. After Elizabeth Proctor’s name is brought up in court, Mary Warren defends her against the accusation. At the end of Act II, the reader hopes that the basic sense of honesty will remain strong enough to allow Mary to testify on behalf of the accused women in Act III.
There are many ways to decide what makes a man guilty. In an ethical sense, there is more to guilt than just committing the crime. In Charles Brockden Browns’ Wieland, the reader is presented with a moral dilemma: is Theodore Wieland guilty of murdering his wife and children, even though he claims that the command came from God, or is Carwin guilty because of his history of using persuasive voices, even though his role in the Wieland family’s murder is questionable? To answer these questions, one must consider what determines guilt, such as responsibility, motives, consequences, and the act itself. No matter which view is taken on what determines a man’s guilt, it can be concluded that Wieland bears the fault in the murder of Catharine Wieland and her children.
Justine, too, is an ‘idealised figure’, described during the trial as having a countenance which, ‘always engaging, was rendered, by the solemnity of her feelings, exquisitely beautiful.’ She is the archetypal innocent, being beautiful, weak and entirely accepting of her fate to the point of martyrdom.
Next, let’s look at the most crucial piece of evidence in this case: the locket. The family heirloom that William took with him on the night of his homicide that somehow ended up on the person of Justine Moritz. Once again, the defense has neglected to account for this. With this evidence alone, you, the jury, should convict Justine Moritz for the tragic murder of William Frankenstein. How could the locket have been in the possession of the defendant unless she had taken it from the corpse of William? And, if she had taken it from the corpse of William, she must have been the one to cause his death.
In "Frankenstein" by Mary Shelley, Victor Frankenstein creates a monster that brings chaos and deaths to Victor Frankenstein's family and friends for revenge. This is one example of how too much knowledge can be dangerous. In addition to Frankenstein, the classical novel, "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Hyde." exemplifies why too much knowledge can cause chaos. In the novel, Dr. Jekyll creates salt in his laboratory that changes his physical appearance. Thus makes an alter ego named Hyde who murders citizens of England for pleasure. This changes Dr. Jekyll since he keeps switching appearances until one day, he changes to Hyde permanently. These examples show that the misuse of knowledge is dangerous. From bringing misery to Frankenstein to changing into a murderous alter ego, humans cannot handle too much
As Frankenstein returns to the court, the guilt burdens him because the court condemns Justine for a crime she does not commit. The tragedy of William’s death brings the burden of constant
...or Frankenstein, does not live up to his role model. He lacks compassion for his creation (perhaps a reflection on the lack of belief in a benevolent deity in which Mary was raised), and shirks his moral responsibility by refusing to disclose his experiments to the community around him." (Madigan 3)
Many punishments for crimes are often given to innocent people. In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelly, there are several instances in which the punishment is given to an innocent person. Justine, a maid at the Frankenstein residence, was killed for a crime she did not commit. Felix, a character the Monster encounter, was exiled from his country, for helping an innocent man escape from jail. Lastly Victor himself was jailed for a murder, which he did not commit.
At the beginning of life, humans are exposed to the outside world with an open and blank mind. A newborn has no knowledge, no concerns or worries and it only seeks to fulfill its main necessities. Surrounded by the outside world one lives through many experiences where knowledge is accepted. Encountering other human beings reflects upon one's perception and brings about ones self decisions. Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, written in 1816, demonstrates through characters that an obsessive desire for more knowledge may ruin ones life.
The fact that Frankenstein’s monster kills out of revenge and anger is a form evil but one can understand and to a certain extent sympathise with his inability to reason right from wrong. Many examples of this inability are shown, for example, the creature strangles Frankenstein’s innocent young brother because he cannot under...
Sayres, William G. “Compounding the Crime: Ingratitude and the Murder Conviction of Justine Moritz in Frankenstein.” Sayres, "Compounding the Crime", knarf.english.upenn.edu/Articles/sayres.html.
...Frankenstein and the creature. The situations that each character experience are lessons about how seeking prohibited intelligence comes with extreme consequences. Frankenstein is a Gothic novel which means it involves the supernatural; however, because it contains religious qualities it is more appealing to the common people’s idea of knowledge. Mary Shelley achieves her goal of informing the audience that man should not seek or possess the level of knowledge that God acquires. One should learn from the situations present in the novel because life comes with an enormous amount of knowledge; going after the unknown is an act of rebellion against God.
Besides selfishness, Frankenstein includes many other themes. The popular phrase "Knowledge is Power" is taken to great extents in this novel, proving that too much knowledge is ultimately powerless. In the beginning of the novel, Victor was just innocently studying. However, his thirst for knowledge turned into a dangerous obsession. When Frankenstein stumbles on the ideas of life and death, his massive curiosity started the track to his later downfall. Victor craved the knowledge and power beyond human capabilities, he craved to achieve greatness, thus starting his monster creation. The knowledge that Victor wanted was that of knowing how to create life. Victor spent a great amount of time gathering old body parts and attempting to bring something dead back to life. But really what gains can Victor achieve from this? Why is he going through all this trouble? Knowledge is a dangerous thing to play with. Because