Should The Apollo 11 Conspiracy

479 Words1 Page

The Apollo 11 mission was an important event for the United States and the world. Astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong climbed down the ladder of the lunar module and onto the surface of the moon. The Apollo 11 moon landing, a topic that brings up a lot of debates between those who believe it happened and those who believe it did not happen. It has been half a century since the magnificent Apollo 11 moon landing, yet many people still do not believe it happened. Conspiracy theories about events dating back to the 1970s are, in fact, more popular than ever. A common theory is that film director Stanley Kubrick helped NASA fake the historic footage of its six successful moon landings. However, with video, you can see they used the Apollo …show more content…

Winds blowing along the sand dunes, rain in the forest, or plant and animal activity will eliminate the evidence of your tracks over time. Also, if we walked on the Moon, we would expect our footprints to remain there. Without winds, rains, snows, glaciers, rockslides, or any other means of moving and rearranging the particles on the Moon's surface, any footprints should remain for an endless length of time. Finally, over 8,000 photos documenting our trip. Conspiracy theorists argue that the lack of stars in the Apollo 11 mission photographs prove that the event was staged. NASA could not have faked the full wonder of the lunar sky, and so they simply chose not to include any stars at all. On the other hand, most Apollo 11 deniers believe that the shadows in the moon landing photos prove the images were faked. The image has been taken as proof by conspiracy theorists that the Moon landings were faked. Surely if the Sun were the only light source, then the shadows should be parallel? Does this not prove that the whole scene was mocked up in a studio, with multiple light sources creating different shadow

Open Document