In the world of collegiate sports, the daunting problematic topic is whether students should receive compensation from schools to play. While heavy arguments exist for both sides of the debate, it is clear that students cannot get paid to play. Student-athletes must remember they are students primarily than athletes. With schools being paid for by colleges, there is no reason for extra money to be given to the new college students. Though many people believe paying student-athletes to play should be implemented, it will taint student decisions in recruiting, student education is free, and history shows it's illegal and should continue to have punishments. First and foremost, students should not be paid to play because they are students first …show more content…
According to the National Collegiate Athletic Association, more than 180,000 student-athletes receive around $3.6 billion in athletic scholarships in Divisions I and II each year. For those who receive sports scholarships, the funds can play a major role in helping families pay for college. This number is an extreme example of college athletes not being under-compensated but rather making a lot of money every year. Student-athletes must remember that other students are not receiving the same benefits as they are simply because they don't play the sport the others do. If those stats from the NCAA are accurate, this means that students that play sports are averaging $20,000 in academics per year. Minimum wage full-time jobs pay annual salaries of $16,500. Thus, they are getting a full-time job salary to go to school and play sports. Meanwhile, Mason Butts, a UCLA Masters degree grad in finance and education, found that “63% of all undergraduates receive at least one grant or scholarship. Students often must pay for the rest of their education.” (Butts, 2021 para 4). With this stat found, it indicates that there are still 37% of college students that aren’t getting a cent. Meanwhile, the student-athletes are getting full scholarships or even partial scholarships to play and are disregarding education. Regardless of what …show more content…
Peter Jacobs, a collegiate news reporter, found and stated, “Collegiate student-athletes may spend more than 40 hours a week practicing, leaving little time to keep up with academic commitments, according to a recent lawsuit against the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.” (Jacobs, 2015 para. 1). The adage of the adage. This statement shows that students practice and play their sports for longer than a full-time job, thus indicating the necessity there is for some reward for their dedication. Nonetheless, the direct reward is playing for a collegiate school and getting free tuition and boarding in the process. Peter Jacobs also had an interview with Robert Orr, a lawyer from the University of North Carolina, stating, “If these young men and women are going to come in and put in 30, 40, 50 hours, the least we can give them is a set of circumstances academically that allows them to benefit educationally from what they have put into the athletics context," (Jacobs 2015, para. 8). The syllable of the syllable. His statement is a crucial argument showcasing the dedication student-athletes put in for their schools and do not get a cash reward. However, as mentioned previously, the student-athletes are there to be students first and then athletes. It matters more on how they are doing in
always been a debate on whether college athletes should be paid in addition to their tuition. Many may believe that the athletes deserve this extra pay, but I certainly disagree. I think that college athletes should not get special treatment because of their athletic abilities. I also believe that it would be unfair to students that do not have the ability to participate in athletics. College athletes should not get paid because only certain players play, some colleges can not afford to pay athletes
Why should athletes not be paid? I’m going to tell you why the college athletes should not be paid to play sports. You should care about this topic because it is a problem that colleges face and if you want to play sports in college you might want to be paid for them as well but you get to choose whether to play sports or not. The college students should get the pride of playing the sport than the money. In college it is time to learn, if a student wants to become a pro athlete or an architect for
with sports is, should student athletes be be paid a salary? Some people believe that they should be paid and others would completely disagree. Even though they technically are being paid, they really are not. The only type of way the athletes would be paid is through financial aid or if they have a job. Only their education is being paid by the school. Although some people believe that they should be paid, it would not be a good idea at all. So college athletes should not be paid at all because
Student athletes should get paid by their schools because they generate revenue for various organizations, spend hours practicing and playing their sport, and risk their body of getting injured. Female and male college athletes should get paid from their schools. The female and the male athletes not only go to class, but they also both participate in a school activity that takes away time from their ability to earn an income from a regular job. While some people think college athletes should get
Should College Athletes Get Paid? One of the biggest controversies in the sports world is if student athletes should be paid on salary. Some believe that they should be paid and others would love to beg to differ. Student athletes are paid in many ways through scholarships and tuition grants that cover their room and board and meal plans. With this, only their education is being paid for by the school. After a lot of research, it would not be smart to put college athletes on salary. College athletes
made illegal by the NCAA for any student athlete to receive any type of reward for their performance. In the last five years there has been a heated debate on whether the NCCA should start paying college athletes. People responded to this situation with mixed views and opinions. The first reason that people have shown views against pay for play is because scholarships pay for college athlete’s school either fully or partially. Secondly people believe pay for play would create jealousy and hypocrisy
in school to be able to play a sport. College athletes do not have time for a job with school also the time they put in for the sport they play. What are the effects of paying college athletes? Body The NCAA stands for National Collegiate Athletic Association.
passion comes from everyone trying to prove themselves to be good enough to play at the next level and start to get paid for it. now once they start get paid they would feel like they do not have to play as hard because they are already getting paid to play and there is no need for them to go pro. Now that do not mean that the athletes will not work as hard because they could, but it is less likely. If a they are getting paid to compete it takes the passion out of the game and the player are no longer
If student-athletes should be paid to play does that mean high school and pee-wee athletes should be cashing in on checks too? No, but because of the maturity level difference and circumstances of the situation there has been a debate for years on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Paying these athletes would get them not only ready for professional careers, but also provides a needed income for them on little or not on a scholarship. It would help eliminate from cheating, and or “throwing
Should college athletes be paid? That’s the million dollar question. Throughout the past decade more and more people are complaining about college athletes not getting paid. This has become a major issue in the NCAA and around the country. Now, because of all the complaining, college athletes are close to getting paid. This has been debated and fought over through recent years. The NCAA president doesn’t like the idea of this either. Taking away athletes' amateur status would be the "end of college
There are more than 420 thousand student athletes in the NCAA. They all play a lot of different sports football,basketball,soccer. The athletes play a lot of different sports and some of them go to the professional and some do not . The average Football Bowl Subdivision Player is paid 137,357 per year, and the men's basketball player gets paid 289,031per year. The players earns just $23,204 in scholarship money to go to there college that is not enough to pay for all there needs. That will barely
The argument whether a student-athlete should be paid to play or not be paid is one that spans the ages. College sports are considered to be of amateur status by the NCAA. Therefore they believe student-athletes should not receive a pay check to participate in a sport. However on the other end of the spectrum, many critics believe that student-athletes should receive pay for play because not only are they participating in a sport, they are entertaining the spectators. They believe that if performers
College Athletes Should athletes in college be paid for playing sports or are the scholarships that they get enough? College players at D1 schools get $200,000 to $300,000 worth of scholarships for schooling and everything else they need a full ride is a full ride everything is paid for. Why would they need extra money if they are already getting 200,000 to 300,000 dollars? They should not be is the answer. These athletes are bringing in ESPN, NCAA and everyone else that makes money off of them
Collegiate Level Providing financial aid to college athletes has been a controversial issue for quite some time now. The debate over whether or not they should be paid to play sports at the collegiate level is backed up by two strong opposing sides. There are many rational reasons that support each side. I believe college student athletes should receive financial incentives as credit for playing sports at this level. In this essay I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of paying collegiate
yourself and what you are going to study, and add playing a sport on top of that stress as well. You play a sport all throughout your childhood and high school, you do not want to give that up as you go away to college. You decide you are going to go to college to play that sport, not only do you want to play that sport, you also want to go to a Division Ι school and compete at the highest