Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on athletic scholarship
Essay on athletic scholarship
Essay on athletic scholarship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on athletic scholarship
Student athletes should get paid by their schools because they generate revenue for various organizations, spend hours practicing and playing their sport, and risk their body of getting injured. Female and male college athletes should get paid from their schools. The female and the male athletes not only go to class, but they also both participate in a school activity that takes away time from their ability to earn an income from a regular job. While some people think college athletes should get paid others think they should not.
An athlete not getting paid is a policy written down by the NCAA that college athletes should not receive any money from their school. Most arguments about college athletes not getting paid by their school is an excuse
…show more content…
by the NCAA that it would turn athletes into employees. Like any job a human works and get pays and so should athletes. The policy that stops college athletes from receiving money from their school for their performance and bringing in billions of dollars to the school is like a regular person working at a job and not getting paid. Both female and male college athletes generate revenue for a variety of organizations.
When college athletes perform well, the colleges make more money off the fans. Stadiums the size of Ole Miss, Alabama, and Mississippi State hold a lot of fans to bring in money to watch college student athletes perform. D. Staneley Eitzen, a professor at the department of Sociology of Colorada State Univeristy agrees that college athletes should be paid by their school in his article "College Athletes Should Be Paid." Eitzen says, “The governing body of big time college sports, the NCAA is caught in a huge contradiction trying to reconcile a multibillion dollar industry while claiming it is really an amateur activity” ("College Athletes Should Be Paid."). He feels colleges make enough money to give college athletes scholarships and a pay check. Big games on television bring in a lot of money to the school. Big games on television for college athletes means time spent away from class and regular income jobs, which brings in a lot of money to schools’ revenue but not the athlete. Eitzen says, “Each team playing in a BCS game currently receives about 13,000,000 and under the terms of the new contracts will receive around 17,000,000 in the final years of the agreement” ("College Athletes Should Be Paid."). Student college athletes should get paid from the school because of the money gamers make off of NCAA video games. Gamers make millions off college student athletes. The college …show more content…
athlete should get a percentage off of the games being sold in stores because they are the ones making buyers buy the games. Student college athletes should get paid from the school because of the time spent on the sport. Tom Palaima, a Dickson Centenial Professor of Classics at the Univeristy of Texas at Austin agrees with that student athletes should get paid. He believes if college athletes got paid money they would turn into employees and their jobs would keep them out of trouble. According to Palaima, Romonce Taylor, one of the best running backs to come through Texas, lost his scholarship and a chance to play football at the next level because he was trying to sell marijuana to get money ("College Athletes Should Be Paid as Schools Neglect Their Academic Interests."). Palaimia believes players only get a small portion of the money through scholarships and this policy is not right. Student athletes practice a lot. A student college athlete spends about 41 hours or more practicing through the week to get ready to perform in a game. They should get paid because that is more hours than an average human works in a week. Student college athletes also miss a lot of class because of big games on television that brings in a lot of money to the school. Palaimia says, “College schools make 12,000,000 a year off college athletes only giving the athlete 2,000,000 of that money back in scholarships over a four year period of time” ("College Athletes Should Be Paid as Schools Neglect Their Academic Interests."). Student athletes run the risk of getting injured by entertaining fans. Athletes get bruised up from hits on the field. In result of that, college athletes should get paid by their school for putting their body on the line for the school. College athletes tear ACLs that prevent them from walking normally in the future. College athletes also suffer brain damage from concussions. It is damage to the brain that slows down many athletes’ thinking and their reactions to questions. While some people think college athletes should get paid others think otherwise. Athletes not getting paid is a policy written down by the NCAA that college athletes should not get paid by their school for their performance. Most arguments about college athletes not getting paid by their school is an excuse by the NCAA that it would turn athletes into employees. Rebecca Zisso, born in Rome, Italy is known for her on Wonder Woman 2017, disagrees that athletes should not get paid by their school in the article “Fair Play: Should College Athletes get Paid.” In Zisso’s article, Rick Burton a sports management professor at Syracuse University in New York says, “Athletes should not get paid because their college expenses are covered.” He says, “Many top players receive scholarships that pays for books, tutoring, housing, meals, clothing, elite coaching, medical care, travel expenses and career counseling” ( "Fair Play: Should College Athletes Get Paid?").
Zisso believes the money college athletes make for the school is paid back to them through their scholarship. Kieran McCauley a writer for the Daily Local New in Montogemery agrees with Zisso that college athletes should not get paid by their school in his article, “College Athletics Shouldn’t be Paid.” McCauley states, “Student College athletes’ scholarships are their compensation and a fair one at that” (“College Athletics Shouldn’t be Paid.”). “Essentially they receive a free education and in return they represent the school” (McCauley). “Krikor Meshefejian is a senior editor for the Journal of the Business Law Society who agrees with Zisso that college athletes should not get paid by their school” (Meshefejian). Mark Murphy, Director of Athletics at Northwestern University, who participated in the sports television network debate on the topic of paying student-athletes, says in
Mesefejian article, “Pay to Play: Should College Athletes Be Paid?", “Paying athletes anything beyond a scholarship, argues Murphy, would cause problems, particularly from a gender equity standpoint” (Mesefejian). Joseph Nocera, known as Joe the sport writer for the New York Times, was born May 6, 1952 in Providence Rhode Island. Bob Williams, the other author, is also a writer for the New York Times. They agrees with Rebecca Zisso about college athletes getting paid by their school is wrong in their article, "Should College Athletes Be Paid?" Nocera and Williams says, “Paying college athletes would shift their focus away from academics” ("Should College Athletes Be Paid?"). He believes if colleges started paying athletes they would think about money and not an education. Nocera and Williams says, “Paying college athletes to play turns them into employees” ("Should College Athletes Be Paid?"). They said, “Only two percent of college athletes make it to the professional league, so they should focus on their education and not a paycheck” (Nocera and Williams). Nocera and Williams think the money the athletes help bring to the school is giving back to the players through the 2.7 billion dollars in scholarships issued out to them throughout their four years at the school. ("Should College Athletes Be Paid?"). They said, “Athletes are reward for their hard work by leaving school debt free.” (Nocera and Williams). While some people think college athletes should get paid others think they should not. Student college athletes need money for a lot of reasons. They have needs and wants. Student athletes should get paid for their hard work on the field, court, or track. They bring fans to the game, which means money for the school. Some of the money being made could go out to the student college athletes who help bring it in.
Daugherty, Paul. "College athletes already have advantages and shouldn't be paid." Sports Illustrated. Sports Illustrated, 20 Jan. 2012. Web. 25 Apr. 2014. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/paul_daugherty/01/20/no.pay/
through scholarships, these scholarships will help them get money later on in life using their degrees. The podcast by Doug Merril also said "being a college athlete is a choice it defiantly isn't a mandatory thing." Becoming a college athlete is a decision each player has to make the individual player chose to play a particular sport this does not warrant the right for a player to get paid if they want to be paid be good enough to play after college
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote regards a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid for playing for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
In summary college athletes should be paid because they are too busy to have a job, the NCAA has enough money and they can put in salary caps so everybody get paid
Salvador, Damon. “Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid?” 20 April 2013.Web. 18 May 2014.
Should college athletes receive pay for what they do? You’ve probably seen this pop-up a million times, and thought about it. You’ve probably figured why should they? Aren’t they already receiving benefits from a full-ride scholarship? But then an athlete will get caught up in a scandal like Johnny Manziel, where he signed footballs for money.. then you think well why shouldn’t he receive that money? And you then contradict yourself. But shouldn’t they receive money from outside sources, and then the benefits from the school. Not get a salary from the school just the benefits they’re already receiving, and money from sponsors. Wouldn’t that make sense considering the money they’re making the school? According to an ESPN report Alabama University makes $123,769,841 in total revenue from sports. (College Athletics Revenue) Yes ONE HUNDRED & TWENTY THREE MILLION. Yet an athlete from Alabama can only receive benefits from a scholarship.. That doesn’t seem right. You would want to be payed when the opportunity arises. It should only be fair these players get a piece of the revenue pie, after all they are the ones creating the revenue. The players should be getting benefits to allow them to pay for basic college needs, grow up to be responsible adults, and allow the NCAA to thrive. This would allow for the NCAA to truly thrive as a sporting association.
Athletes everywhere complain and gripe about how little money they have. What they don’t realize is, it’s not just them. Most college students do not have a sufficient amount of money that they can buy whatever they want. It is outrageous that athletes believe they are entitled to accommodations because they play sports. To play a sport at the collegiate level is a privilege (Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should Not Be Paid). Students that participate in athletics should not receive any payment because they are receiving tons of benefits, free tuition, and this would extend the talent gap.
Ever since college students started playing sports, back in 1879 when Harvard played Yale in the first collegiate sports game, the question of whether college athletes should be paid was addressed. From that point on athletes, coaches, and college administrators have brought forward points agreeing or disagreeing with the notion of paying college students. The students argue that they deserve to be paid due to the revenue that they bring for the college and because of the games they play and the championships they win. At first the idea of paying college athletes was out of the question, but now the argument has gone from a simple yes or no to a heated debate. Since college athletes are given a free education, they should not also be paid.
College athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure will continue to rise. It’s simple: bigger, faster, stronger athletes will generate more money. College Universities generate so much revenue during the year that it is only fair to the players that they get a cut. College athletes should get paid based on the university’s revenue, apparel sales, and lack of spending money.
College athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.
"The best argument against paying players is that it diminishes the value of an education" (qtd. in Zimbalist). State University has breached its academic standard by allocating unnecessary expenditures to athletically advanced students. Student athletes should not be paid at State University, because it focuses on an extracurricular activity as a means of profit, praises athletic ability over merit/ scholastics, promotes a bridge between players and regular students, and creates hierarchy between universities.
One of the strongest arguments against student athletes getting paid is that many people feel they already are getting paid, through their financial aid package. Sports Illustrated author, Seth Davis, states in his article “Hoop Thoughts”, that “student athletes are already being payed by earning a free tuition. Which over the course of four years can exceed $200,000, depending on the school they attend. They are also provided with housing, textbooks, food and academic tutoring. When they travel to road games, they are given per diems for meals. They also get coaching, training, game experience and media exposure in their respective crafts” (Davis, 2011). This is a considerable amount of income. While the majority of regular students are walking out of school with a sizeable amount of debt, most student athletes are debt free. Plus they get to enjoy other benefits that are not made available to the average student. They get to travel with their teams, t...
College athletes should be paid because they are basically working for the school. When a student gets a scholarship to a college for a sport they are expected to practice with the team and without the team, so on their free time. College athletes go way over the maximum amount of hours they are allowed to practice with the team. A 2011 survey, from the article Should College Athletes Be Paid?, states “The NCAA has a limit of 20 hours of training per week, D1 football players on average practice 43 hours a week, baseball 42.1 hours a week, and men’s basketball 39.2 hours a week”(Walch). With
Student athletes are the main reason why college sports exist. Even though it is a highly profitable area, the NCAA claims that they cannot afford to pay athletes that are involved in competitive college athletics. There are many reasons why the college athletes should get paid. One huge and controversial reason is, what if the athlete gets injured and cannot live a normal life. This has been in-question many times during debates on the athletic department of many colleges. Imagine yourself as an injured college