Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay

College Athletes Should athletes in college be paid for playing sports or are the scholarships that they get enough? College players at D1 schools get $200,000 to $300,000 worth of scholarships for schooling and everything else they need a full ride is a full ride everything is paid for. Why would they need extra money if they are already getting 200,000 to 300,000 dollars? They should not be is the answer. These athletes are bringing in ESPN, NCAA and everyone else that makes money off of them millions to even billions of dollars. Which this is a lot of money but these athletes do not see any of this money. The money that they get from their scholarship should be more than enough they are already getting a $300,000 scholarship why should they get more money. However, others think they should be getting paid more money from the money that they are making for the NCAA, ESPN and other networks. Many

In an article named Should college athletes be paid to play? By Kenneth J. Copper. He says “New dimension to long debate over paying athletes by arguing they are “employed” under federal labor laws and entitled to form unions and negotiate wages, hours and working conditions” (Copper 1). Now there are people fighting to say that college athletes under the law from the federal government shows that these athletes are labeled as being employed. This should mean that they should get paid like a regular employed person and be able to spend that money how they want. He also goes on to say “Dolald Remy, the NCAA general counsel and vice president for legal affairs, says that court precedents and tax laws have upheld the status of college athletes as students” (Copper, 1). Now they are saying that this money that they would be getting will make it so these college athletes would no longer just be students but they also would be employed under the University as like a professor or a