Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect sports have on students
Impact of sport on education
Impact of college athletics on academics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
College sports such as football and basketball are very popular in the United States. College sports makes colleges a lot of money and revenue every year. College athletes can be seen as an idol to some people or to the college that they are attending. Tim Tebow is known for playing football for the Florida Gators, winning the Heisman, and for his touchdown celebration “Tebowing.” Athletes like this make colleges millions of dollars every season. Being an athlete they still have to stay in school to be able to play a sport. College athletes do not have time for a job with school also the time they put in for the sport they play. What are the effects of paying college athletes?
Body
The NCAA stands for National Collegiate Athletic Association.
…show more content…
The NCAA oversees all athletic activities at colleges around the nation. To be member of the NCAA, schools have to register with them in order to be a member. The NCAA has rules and regulations for the student athlete and what they can and cannot do. Players cannot sell or sign memorabilia for money. Another rule for the student athlete is that no student can receive financial aid from anyone other than what the school offers to them. NCAA also has rules on academic eligibility (Patterson). To practice students have to be in a full time program where the student can earn a bachelor’s or a degree that they pursue. For the student athlete it is hard to have a part time job and keep your grades up to play a sport. Most students don’t have jobs at all because there is absolutely no time for a job. Things to know about the college athlete is that most of these college athletes have received a scholarship to play the sport.
Scholarships given to college athletes can cover tuition, fees, room, board and textbooks coming from the NCAA. Some athletes only get some of these expenses but some still receive more benefits than the average student. Scholarships can range from 20,000 to 100,000 dollars. Without scholarship many students could not pursue their academic or athletic goals. Students that receive scholarships like this are talented or work hard to earn money for them. Some may see a scholarship as the student already getting paid to play a sport. “A scholarship can be seen as earning money to go to college for free and should not be paid any amount of money on the side” (Johnson). Many athletes argue that they do not have time for a job and should be paid by the university to have extra money to go out with friends and buy necessary items. Many college athletes are broke and deal with these kinda things every day. Some say not having enough money is something you tend to deal with in college . Playing a sport is a full time job. Athletes could be at practice or doing something with the sport for fourty to fourty five hours a week. That would be considered working a full time job, but they are spending that time involving themself with a sport instead. A student might want money for food, clothes, and personal …show more content…
issues. Why college athletes should be paid to play a college sport is because there just like any other athlete just in college.
The NCAA is largest collegiate sports organization in the United States. “For 2012-2013 the NCAA reported $871.6 million in revenue eighty-one percent came from agreements with with CBS sports, eleven percent came from sponsoring championships such as the March Madness basketball tournament.”(Dabad) .The NCAA distributes roughly sixty percent of its revenues to help found athletic departments and scholarships. No college sport generates more money than college football. Last year The Ohio State University football program brought in 95 million dollars which tied for the most that a college has made in the United States. Not one penny of that money that those college athletes bring goes back to the student athlete who are the stars of the game. College athletes put their bodies on the line every game they play. In 2013 Louisville basketball player Kevin Ware suffered a terrible compound fracture to his right leg. Luckily about six to eight months later he was back to practicing.There have been college athletes who have been paralyzed for a big hit on the football field or any playing field. Some injuries have ended players’ careers before they have even started. These athletes are hurting their bodies for a sport that they love to play. Getting paid to play a college sport could help the athlete by getting ready for the future. It can get them
ready for the future by giving them a amount of money to pay bills and buy what is needed for them to live. They can also be treated like they will be if they move on to a professional sport. Some think if they got paid it would help them in the future as a professional. Paying college athletes could create a sense of financial awareness. Many athletes are financially not responsible. ‘Sixty percent of NBA players are broke within five years of retirement” (Preston). A lot of players say it is because of poor investment or bad spending habits. Paying college athletes could help them build some type of financial awareness. This would help students with investments no matter if they were going to play a professional sport or not to carry them throughout their career. Why college athletes should not be paid to play a college sport it is too big of a debate for some people to solve. Paying college athletes could detract from the purity of the game. Many people believe that college athletes play with more passion and care for the sport than athletes at the professional level because they already made it to where they wanted to be so they don’t risk injury as much as college athletes (Patterson). Paying college athletes could make them not want to play as hard as they can because they are receiving money. If students were to get paid they would probably play harder. Many student athletes are already receiving a free education. Not all student receive scholarships. Most of the ones who receive scholarships are on teams that can win a national championship. Some student athletes receive extra money towards books and basic needs but usually it is only the good ones. None of this money has to be paid back. About half of these students don’t receive extra money and will come out of college with a lot of student loan debt. But student athletes already have it much easier than other students at their school. Students receiving scholarships should not be seen as receiving money because its going all towards their education. Theres a strong stand against even thinking about paying college athletes. Only a few college sports bring in enough money. Football and basketball are the biggest money makers in college sports. So there comes the question whether only football and basketball players should be paid and is that fair to everyone else? Another question would be how they should be paid and how would it work? Could you make it close to the same as professional athletes? Where would the money come from? These question show how hard it would be to change the system for college athletes (Patterson). I do believe that these question can be answered if people would work hard enough and come together on a conclusion. If college athletes were to be paid, there are some different ways they could be paid. One way would be to pay them based on how they play. They could earn certain amounts of money based on how they play. If a college athlete matched a certain stat that they had to get to earn money, then that would be a way to pay them. Another way would be a education lockbox. A trust fund for student athletes where they can access money that they earn. Say that a student reaches their degree and is getting ready to graduate. There would be a fund of money after they get out of school that they earned through the years that the student was there that would help them pay for college or set them on there way. Now players that break the rules could lose some of the money or all of it. The last way would not be actually paying college athletes but letting them make their own money by letting them sell or earn money from their memorabilia. If the NCAA would let college athletes sell their own memorabilia, they can earn their own money off their own name. There have been many players who have got in serious trouble from trying to sell signed memorabilia. Last year Todd Gurley, running back for Georgia University, got suspended for selling his autograph to a dealer. It is against NCAA rules for a student to profit from their names and images. Many people feel it is unfair that college students cannot make a profit off their own name while the NCAA makes millions off of them. If college athletes would be allowed to sell their signatures, then they could make their own money to live off of during college. Conclusion College athletes are just like regular athletes but they don’t have much experience and they're still in college. They paid for college why can’t they get some of that money back?. The NCAA generates millions of dollars every year college athletes deserve a share of the money that they generated. Being a college athlete is a full time job and adding classes to that can be stressful. They shouldn't get paid a lot but they should get paid around the amount as is they had a part time job. That would be enough money for them to have extra money in there pocket. Both sides of this argument to pay or not to pay college athletes are passionate. College athletes should be paid for playing a college sport.
The proposal of payment toNCAA student-athletes has begun major conversations and arguments nationwide with people expressing their take on it. “This tension has been going on for years. It has gotten greater now because the magnitude of dollars has gotten really large” (NCAA). I am a student athlete at Nicholls State University and at first thought, I thought it would be a good idea to be able to be paid as a student-athlete.After much research however; I have come to many conclusions why the payment of athletes should not take place at the collegiate level.The payment of athletes is only for athletes at the professional level. They are experts at what they do whether it is Major League Baseball, Pro Basketball, Professional Football, or any other professional sport and they work for that franchise or company as an employee. The payment of NCAA college athletes will deteriorate the value of school to athletes, create contract disputes at both the college and professional level, kill recruiting of athletes, cause chaos over the payment of one sport versus another, and it will alter the principles set by the NCAA’s founder Theodore Roosevelt in 1906. Under Roosevelt and NCAA, athletes were put under the term of a “student-athlete” as an amateur. All student athletes who sign the NCAA papers to play college athletics agree to compete as an amateur athlete. The definition of an amateur is a person who “engages in a sport, study, or other activity for pleasure rather than for financial benefit or professional reasons” (Dictonary.com).
On a podcast from virginiaforusa.com the speaker Doug Merril said " colleges give most of the major athletes huge sums of money through scholarships some of these scholarships can be worth up top 200,000 dollars."Colleges shouldn’t have to pay athletes if they already get money
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote regards a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid for playing for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Imagine this you are the star player on your college football team and you get your fifth concussion causing you to be out of sports the rest of your life due to health reason and when you are 40 you get alzheimer's causing you to have life brain problems and having to spend lots of money in rehab and you never feel the same ever again and are in major det and only your are in and out of jobs because of your brain so your wife has to support you with the money to help cure it while you get lost easily when driving and can't remember stuff from the day before like why am I one this plane while heading to get therapy for your brain. This is why college athletes should be paid they should because they are too busy to have a job, The NCAA has enough money and They can put in salary caps so everybody get paid fair. But other say they shouldn't because it ruins their sentimental values and family history.
... being paid. Many people prefer watching college sports over professional sports based on the idea that money isn’t involved in college sports. They are competing and giving everything they have for the love of their teammates, the love of their school, and above all, their love for the game. Paying athletes would ruin this standard of intercollegiate athletics. For all these reasons, college athletes should not be paid beyond their full ride scholarships.
College sports are so entertaining because any team can win any game due to the spread of great athletes all over the country. If colleges started to pay the athletes, whatever team had the most money would have the best athletes, meaning there would only be a couple of good teams in each sport and they would dominate. Professional sports teams are a collection of the best and most skilled athletes in that sport that can play for 15 or more years. In college, athletes only have four years of eligibility before they are ineligible and can not participate in college athletics anymore and many of the great athletes leave after one or two years of playing college sports. If money was used to pay the athletes, the corruption of college sports would increase. Money is never a good idea to be involved in sports, because it always causes bribery or exploitation. For example, the recent events with the FIFA organization and how some of the top authority figures have just been banned for many years for taking bribes, illegal ticket sales, and other scandals (Davis). This relates because it goes to show any CEO or president of a company can be bought and if money started to get more involved in the world of college sports it is hard not to think that some authority figure for some team would be bribed. Even the students might be involved in the bribery. If college athletes were to get paid there would be a limit to how much they would get paid. Fans and sponsors of the college teams would then offer additional benefits to get the athletes “persuaded” to come to their school. Then student athletes will not have to attend class or even participate in the student part of student athlete. The college athletes would start to be glorified and treated like kings even though they are coming into their college as just
Athletes everywhere complain and gripe about how little money they have. What they don’t realize is, it’s not just them. Most college students do not have a sufficient amount of money that they can buy whatever they want. It is outrageous that athletes believe they are entitled to accommodations because they play sports. To play a sport at the collegiate level is a privilege (Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should Not Be Paid). Students that participate in athletics should not receive any payment because they are receiving tons of benefits, free tuition, and this would extend the talent gap.
Today there are over 450,000 college athletes and the National College Athletics Association (NCAA) faces a difficult decision on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many people believe that they should and many believe they should not. There are several benefits that college’s athletes receive for being a student athlete. Why should they receive even more benefits than their scholarship and numerous perks?
Some people say that college athletes get paid by having a scholarship, but if you look at it a different way, scholarships might change your mind. Coaches try to get players who they think have the talent to make them win and to persuade them to come to their school by offering them scholarships. The whole idea behind a scholarship is to lure the athlete into coming to your school. Scholarships are nothing more than a recruitment tactic. They will give you a scholarship as long as you produce for them. It’s all about what you can do for them. Indeed these scholarships pay for tuition, room and board, and books, but these athletes don’t have money for other necessities. The NCAA doesn’t want friends or boosters to offer athletes jobs because they ...
The cost of housing and food, puts a huge dent in college student’s pockets every year. College students need anywhere from five-hundred-dollars to one-thousand-dollars a year for food. Getting all the things you need just to make it through college can range anywhere from four-thousand-dollars to eleven-thousand-dollars a year depending on your needs (Frazier). Athletes have a hard time finding time for a job because the sport they play and academics take up their life. If the NCAA would allow schools to pay their athletes it would not only help the many athletes bringing in money to the school, but it could help the school as well by bringing up grades from athletes. When you don’t have to worry about if your bills are going to be paid or you can afford a place to live, you can focus more on the sport you play and the academics that come with
One of the strongest arguments against student athletes getting paid is that many people feel they already are getting paid, through their financial aid package. Sports Illustrated author, Seth Davis, states in his article “Hoop Thoughts”, that “student athletes are already being payed by earning a free tuition. Which over the course of four years can exceed $200,000, depending on the school they attend. They are also provided with housing, textbooks, food and academic tutoring. When they travel to road games, they are given per diems for meals. They also get coaching, training, game experience and media exposure in their respective crafts” (Davis, 2011). This is a considerable amount of income. While the majority of regular students are walking out of school with a sizeable amount of debt, most student athletes are debt free. Plus they get to enjoy other benefits that are not made available to the average student. They get to travel with their teams, t...
Colleges make a plethora of money off of the sports teams and the players do not see any of that money at all but if they do then their performance would be poor on the field and off the field as well. According to Fred Bowen, “only football and men’s basketball are money-making college sports. Most others, such as field hockey, wrestling and swimming, do not attract big crowds or make big bucks.” (Should college athletes get paid?). Also the sports team that give out the most money for athletes to come and play for them, are football and men’s basketball. “Critics of paying college athletes note that only a small number of them compete in sports or on teams that actually generate revenue. They argue that if players were paid, a handful of exceptional athletes would receive large salaries while most players would receive a pittance, and would probably no longer be offered valuable athletic scholarships” (Paying College Athletes). It is not a surprise to anyone that the main athletes that do want to be paid is football and basketball players. They want to be paid because they bring in all of the money for the school and the...
If you or anyone else knows a college athlete, especially one who is on scholarship, you would think that they have it easy. Free tuition and room and board; meanwhile you have to work at a part time job and actually pay for your schooling. But in all reality these people earned what they got, because many of these students did not come from wealthy families. According to USA Today, 85% of college athletes who are on scholarships live below the poverty line. So by receiving a scholarship for athletics it is giving them a chance to improve their own quality of life, and as humans we deserve to at least have some sense of self-worth. Athletes get many accommodations while attending school, aside from them going for free; they c...
College athletes should be paid! College athletes are often considered to be some of the luckiest students in the world. Most of them receiving all inclusive scholarships that cover all the costs of their education. They are also in a position to make a reputation for themselves in the sporting world preparing them for the next step. The ongoing debate whether student athletes should be paid has been going on for years. These athletes bring in millions of dollars for their respective schools and receive zero in return. Many will argue that they do receive payment, but in reality it is just not true. Costs associated with getting a college education will be discussed, information pertaining to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and benefits student athletes receive. First, I’ll start with costs associated with college and most of all why student athletes should be paid!