Should Kids Be Allowed To Play Violent Role Playing Games?

739 Words2 Pages

Kids should not be allowed to play violent role playing games. Imagine; kids stalking, hacking, and following their peers so at the perfect moment they can pounce and strike them dead. This may seem scary, but many high schools partake in these activities as ‘fun’ games. These role playing games may seem like a fun high school experience, but at what cost? These games, which can have kids shooting fake guns, could potentially swing from being a fun, recreational game to pushing kids into a criminal, violent future. These vicious games shouldn’t be allowed as a school game because they break relationships, promote violence, and can force kids into dangerous situations. These violent role playing games can have a very negative effect on people’s relationships with others. The teams that kids are put on are completely decided by a judge, which can lead to friends and couples being pitted against each other. While playing this game, many people take it too far, leading to broken relationships. According to …show more content…

In this excerpt from The New Yorker’s article ‘High-Jinks : Shoot-Out’ by Guy Martin, we are given a clear example of a kid being put in danger. This is a quote from Willis Cohen after he was killed in the game (he got out while riding a taxi to school) : “I told the driver to pull over on the other side of the street, but he wouldn’t do it.” (Martin, 2009, p. 1). This quote from Cohen gives a crystal clear example of a kid being put in a dangerous situation. These situations that kids are put in could be very dangerous and make kids feel very threatened. There was no way for Cohen to know that the taxi driver wasn’t kidnapping him, and in that moment he probably felt very scared. This game can put many kids in Cohen’s place, feeling powerless and

Open Document