Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” mostly takes place in “Ship-Trap” island where humans are being hunted for sport. The main character, Rainsford, is a world class hunter who falls off his yacht while traveling through the Caribbean Sea and swims to an island for safety. Rainsford enters a mansion located on the island and meets two men, Ivan and General Zaroff. General Zaroff like Rainsford is a world class hunter but explains to Rainsford over dinner that hunting animals have become boring to him. He then goes on say that he has found a more challenging creature to hunt and Rainsford finds out that Zaroff hunts humans. Zaroff thinks Rainsford would prove to be the most challenging hunt yet and for three days Rainsford tries …show more content…
to evade and set traps for Zaroff as to not be killed. At the end, Zaroff is not able to hunt down Rainsford and Rainsford kills him in his bedroom. Connell wrote this story to present the central idea that instinct and reason are not as dichotomous as traditionally thought. In the beginning of the story Rainsford has a conversation with his friend Whitney regarding the question of if the animals they hunt feel any fear. Rainsford believes that reason separates humans from animals: “The world is made up of two classes--the hunters and the huntees” (Connell 318) and thus the basic instinct of animals has no place for feelings such as fear: “Who cares how a jaguar feels... Bah! They've no understanding” (Connell 317). The first questioning of the duality between instinct and reason is seen through Whitney who in contrast believes that animals do feel fear: “I rather think they understand one thing--fear.”(Connell 317). The blur between both concepts is further exemplified when, like the instinct of incoming danger animals possess, the sailors passing by what they call “Ship-Trap” island also feel said instinct: “But sometimes I think sailors have an extra sense that tells them when they are in danger”(Connell 318). Both Rainsford and Zaroff share the belief that animals cannot reason: “above all, it must be able to reason- but no animal can reason” (Connell 326) which meant that humans were in essence superior to all other animals and why they were the hunters of the world. Rainsford then experiences the role reversal of becoming prey and has to use both instinct and reason in order to survive. This is shown with how Rainsford keeps alluding to animals and how their instincts help them survive: “all the dodges of the fox.”(Connell 332). At the end, Rainsford ends up killing Zaroff but the reader does not know if he will follow in Zaroff’s footsteps (Connell 337). Connell uses this gray ending as a tool to show the reader how instinct and reason manifests as complexity in humanity. Rainsford is the main character as he shows round and dynamic characteristics as we see his complexity and his transformation of perspective. This is conveyed when Rainsford’s beliefs that humans only use reason and that animals do not feel fear when they are hunted are tested throughout the story. Examples of this are when we see how Rainsford has to use both instinct and reason in order to outsmart Zaroff (Connell 333). Rainsford showed no sympathy for animals being hunted but when he becomes the hunted instead of the hunter Rainsford discovers the feeling of their fear and the instinct to survive: “spurred on by the sharp powers of something very much like panic.”(Connell 332). Zaroff is a grey character as he is introduced as a sophisticated and educated man: “the face of a man used to giving orders, the face of an aristocrat” (Connell 321) and his real motives are not revealed to the reader until later: “I hunt the scum of the earth… but they are men” (Connell 327). Ivan is a flat and static character who is the representation of a killer exhibited by the reveal that he is a Cossack (Connell 322). Whitney is also a flat and static character who is used as foreshadowing for the role-reversal that Rainsford will experience shown through their conversation of hunter and prey (Connell 318). The primary conflict in “The Most Dangerous Game” is the internal conflict of the morality of murdering humans versus hunting animals. This is shown in how both Zaroff and Rainsford enjoy traveling the world killing animals and society sees no wrong in such behavior but the killing of humans is the most heinous of crimes that Rainsford cannot comprehend: “I'm a hunter, not a murderer” (Connell 328). This conflict is exemplified further when Zaroff compares the hunting of humans to killing soldiers and civilians in war which is not seen as immoral: “romantic ideas about the value of human life…surely your experiences in the war” (Connell 327). Rainsford killing Zaroff makes the resolution to this conflict grey and blurred as the reader has to question whether the murder was justified. This conflict is important to the central idea because it conveys how humans have to use both instinct and reason to justify supposed morality. The secondary conflict is the external conflict between Rainsford and General Zaroff. This is shown throughout the sequences of Zaroff hunting down Rainsford and the resolution is again the killing of Zaroff. Rainsford having to use both instinct and reason to defeat Zaroff exhibits the importance of the conflict to the central idea. The point of view in this story is written in third person limited omniscient. This is shown in the story by the fact that the narrator only shows what Rainsford is thinking. For example, during the dinner conversation between Zaroff and Rainsford the reader does not find out about Zaroff’s real motives until it is revealed to Rainsford (Connell 327). This is important to the story and the central idea because it shows how Rainsford did not pay attention to his own instinct regarding Zaroff due to it conflicting with his reasoning of Zaroff being a sophisticated and intellectual military man. This point of view is also important to the characterization because Rainsford’s thoughts and feelings lend him to become a round and dynamic character. This is seen in the story when the panic and fear of being hunted contrasts with Rainsford’s earlier statements regarding how the prey of the world do not feel fear (Connell 332). The story is set in “Ship-Trap” island in the Caribbean Sea. It is specific intentionally by the author to connect the theme of danger and survival between hunter and prey. For example, Rainsford has to use all of his skills and his intellect in order to navigate through the jungle and quicksand of the island. The reader understands the connection to the central idea as Rainsford uses both instinct and reason to survive. In addition, the story alludes to the fact that it is set in a time after World War I. This is shown when Rainsford uses skills he learned in the trenches: “Rainsford had dug himself in in France when a second's delay meant death” (Connell 335) and when Zaroff speaks about the Russian Revolution: “After the debacle in Russia” (Connell 325). This setting is important to the story as it connects to the internal conflict. These men have been put in the position of killing humans much like hunting animals which must affect the morality they see in themselves and society regarding the murder of people. Connell uses language in “The Most Dangerous Game” to emphasize and draw attention to important concepts of the story.
An example being the color red or blood exhibited throughout the story symbolizing the danger and evilness Rainsford encounters in the island. This is shown when Rainsford falls off the yacht into “blood-warm waters” (Connell 319) which foreshadowers the danger Rainsford will find himself in. Another example would be General Zaroff’s appearance: “red lips and pointed teeth…his curious red-lipped smile” (Connell 322). The color red conveys to the reader a certain creepiness to Zaroff which connects to the central idea in that Rainsford did acknowledge his instincts and discover the evilness Zaroff possessed. The author also uses allusion to emphasize the internal conflict the characters have regarding morality. This is seen with the allusion to Rainsford fighting in World War I and General Zaroff in the Russian Revolution: “a division of Cossack cavalry” (Connell 326). The reader understand the connection to the internal conflict due to these two character having the experience of murdering humans in a way that society did not deem …show more content…
immoral. The primary tones in “The Most Dangerous Game” would be that of creepiness and suspense.
The tone is created through the repetition of darkness exhibited throughout the story. This repetition creates a symbolic significance of danger and terror which adds to the overall mood of the story. An example would be when the sea is described: “the dank tropical night that was palpable as it pressed its thick warm blackness” (Connell 317). This repetition continues Zaroff goes out only during the night to search for Rainsford which conveys a suspenseful tone. The tone is also created through the dialogue between the characters such as the conversation between Whitney and Rainsford they speak about hunters and prey and the fear the sailors have of the island (Connell 318). This dialogue is used as foreshadowing that unveils to the reader the sense that something bad is going to happen. In addition, the point of view of the story also clues the reader to the tone. The fact that the reader only knows what Rainsford is thinking and doing means that the whereabouts of Zaroff during the hunt is unknown until Rainsford sees or hears him. This emphasizes the creepiness and suspense of the story because the reader, like Rainsford, always have to be on the lookout for Zaroff. The tone of the story affects the readers understanding of the external conflict between Rainsford and Zaroff. The suspense and creepiness coveys to the reader the seriousness of Rainsford trying to evade and attack
Zaroff. In conclusion, the central idea of the importance of instinct and reason going hand-in-hand is conveyed by Richard Connell through his characters Rainsford and Zaroff and his use of literary concepts and elements shown throughout “The Most Dangerous Game.”
Where does the line of sport and murder intersect in hunting? Is it when the species being hunted is able to reason? Or is it when the species being hunted looks just like the hunter? In both movie and film, we see a man fight for his life and another going against all codes of ethics. While Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” and Ernest B. Schoedsack’s film adaptation both have several similarities, the difference are also apparent in each respective media.
“ The horizon was the color of milk. Cold and fresh. Poured out among the bodies” (Zusak 175). The device is used in the evidence of the quote by using descriptives words that create a mental image. The text gives the reader that opportunity to use their senses when reading the story. “Somehow, between the sadness and loss, Max Vandenburg, who was now a teenager with hard hands, blackened eyes, and a sore tooth, was also a little disappointed” (Zusak 188). This quote demonstrates how the author uses descriptive words to create a mental image which gives the text more of an appeal to the reader's sense such as vision. “She could see his face now, in the tired light. His mouth was open and his skin was the color of eggshells. Whisker coated his jaw and chin, and his ears were hard and flat. He had a small but misshapen nose” (Zusak 201). The quotes allows the reader to visualize what the characters facial features looked like through the use of descriptive words. Imagery helps bring the story to life and to make the text more exciting. The reader's senses can be used to determine the observations that the author is making about its characters. The literary device changes the text by letting the reader interact with the text by using their observation skills. The author is using imagery by creating images that engages the reader to know exactly what's going on in the story which allows them to
For example the connotation ‘red’ is the colour of fire, danger, power, caution and malice. ‘Red’ is an emotionally intense colour and is a consistent theme that builds up like a heated fire because Peter is full of rage and wrath and he is the “red herring” because he is distracting the mum from the truth about the abuse he is causing.
A skilled hunter sprints desperately through the woods, realizing the futility of hiding from his greatest foe: his own kind. Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” is the story of a hunter that becomes the hunted. The story explores the sense of extreme terror the protagonist feels being pursued by a psychopath living on a mysterious island. This protagonist, Rainsford, has many traits that aid him in his battle with the general. By demonstrating his cunning, sly, and remorseful traits, Rainsford shows the story’s theme of “walking a mile in someone else’s shoes”.
“You’re a big-game hunter, not a philosopher. Who cares how a jaguar feels?”. The story “The Most dangerous Game,” by Richard Connell introduces an adventurous type of thriller with two main characters named Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff. Both of which are hunters who in the story play a “game” invented by General Zaroff out of pure fear of becoming bored of the hunt. General Zaroff is a big fan of the hunt and everything he says about the hunt is to be taken serious. Rainsford and General Zaroff are described to be excellent hunters through the traps Rainsford makes, all the big game Zaroff has hunted, but Zaroff is better at hunting through the fact that the hunt has began to bore and he needs more of a challenge hunting humans.
In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the protagonist, Rainsford, is a smart, clever, resilient man who keeps a cool head in stressful and dangerous situations. Rainsford is not allowed to leave the island he washes up on after he falls off the yacht he was traveling on, because the mentally disturbed general wants to hunt people with Rainsford. Rainsford makes a deal with the general to win his freedom. If Rainsford can evade Zaroff for three nights, then Rainsford is free to leave the island. During the hunt, Rainsford must think quickly and be resourceful in order to stay alive. Rainsford is an extremely experienced hunter who writes books about his hunting experiences. When Rainsford is running from the
In Richard Connell’s The Most Dangerous Game Rainsford’s motivations changed from wanting to be a great hunter to trying to stay alive. As Whitney and Rainsford are headed to Rio to hunt they are talking about the great sport itself, hunting. Rainsford agrees with Whitney and says that hunting is, “The best sport in the world” (Connell 1). This shows he enjoys hunting by saying that it’s is the best and most enjoyable sport in the world. If you are passionate about something it can motivate you to try new things and in his case, hunting new animals. After Rainsford falls off the yacht and wanders to the island he then finds a home and knocks on the door. Ivan answers and General Zaroff soon approached Rainsford and saluted him. After allowing
In “The Most Dangerous Game,”Richard Connell uses the dangerous environment of the Island to show suspense while also using a flip between man and animal to convey irony in the story.
Symbolism is also very important to this novel. An example of this is the war; it symbolizes several different things. Finny explains to the head master that “We’re all
The use of diction is powerful, with the gripping use of words and description. Golding creates tension and reinforces his theme and tone with the use of specific words. Many are connotative and therefore create a story abundant in meaning and symbolism. Golding uses colors such as pink to symbolize particular things such as innocence, as shown in the piglets and the island. The word yellow makes the reader think of the sun, enlightenment and Ralph; the words black and red bring to mind evil, blood and Jack.
Connell, Richard. "The Most Dangerous Game--Richard Connell (1893-1949)." Classic Short Stories. Classic Short Stories. Web. 25 Jan. 2010.
Richard Connells “The Most Dangerous Game” is a short story which illustrates that calm analytical thinking can increase your odds of survival and controlling panic.
in the book is very dark, and it helps set the awful mood for the rest
To set the tone in the story the author had to describe the surroundings of the characters. For example the author states, "with the first glimpse of the building, a sense of insufferable gloom pervaded my spirit." when giving a detailed response of how he feels about the house. This helps show that the author himself feels depressed when in sight of the building and gives the reader a thought of how the house looks. Other textual evidence in the passage also shows a feeling of suspense like the quote, "There was an iciness, a sinking, a sickening of the heart - an unredeemed dreariness of thought which no goading of the imagination could torture into aught of the sublime. " which is how the author feels when he thinks about the house. The author cannot bear to imagine the house because he has a dark and negative imagination with different fears he thinks can come to life because of how unsettling the house makes him feel. While suspense is a direct indication of a depressed and dark tone, some other Gothic elements can be used indirectly to describe negative values in the story.
Firstly, the narrator gives little detail throughout the whole story. The greatest amount of detail is given in the first paragraph where the narrator describes the weather. This description sets the tone and mood of the events that follow. Giving the impression that a cold, wet, miserable evening was in