Compare And Contrast Rainsford And General Zaroff

809 Words2 Pages

“You’re a big-game hunter, not a philosopher. Who cares how a jaguar feels?”. The story “The Most dangerous Game,” by Richard Connell introduces an adventurous type of thriller with two main characters named Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff. Both of which are hunters who in the story play a “game” invented by General Zaroff out of pure fear of becoming bored of the hunt. General Zaroff is a big fan of the hunt and everything he says about the hunt is to be taken serious. Rainsford and General Zaroff are described to be excellent hunters through the traps Rainsford makes, all the big game Zaroff has hunted, but Zaroff is better at hunting through the fact that the hunt has began to bore and he needs more of a challenge hunting humans.
Rainsford may not be the better hunter but his traps throughout the game are impressive. The first …show more content…

General Zaroff is the better hunter because of the fact that there are no other animals that are challenging, hunting was becoming boring. “I was lying in my tent with a splitting headache one night when a terrible thought pushed its way into my mind. Hunting was beginning to bore me! And hunting, remember, had been my life.” Cause of this thought he needed an new animal that can reason and be a greater challenge. Rainsford can not relate because he has not hunted as much as General Zaroff and is much younger. Hunting to Zaroff become too easy. “There is no greater bore than perfection.” The new animal Zaroff has invented to hunt are, men. “ No other hunting compares with it for an instant. Every day I hunt, and I never grow bored now, for I have a quarry with which i can match my wits.” Rainsford knows there are no animal that can reason and figures out that he’s hunting men on his island and asks is this a joke, but knowing General Zaroff everything he says about the hunt is to be taken

Open Document