Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Review of related literature of self efficacy
Social class and language use
Related literature about self-efficacy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Review of related literature of self efficacy
Theoretical Framework
For decades now, cognitive scientists have started to devote more attention to the social aspects of cognition. A great impulse to this kind of research has been given by the discovery that humans rely on their own motor system while observing and predicting actions performed by others. The ability to collaborate with others, to take turns, to act in a coordinated and joint manner is necessary for language and communication as well(Gianelli,2013). The socio-cognitive perspectives on reading and learning were used to provide a framework for this study. It provides a better understanding on the cognitive processes students use or do not use and how teachers can better understand their connections with their students.
In
…show more content…
Outcome expectancy is a persons’ estimate that a certain behaviour will produce a resulting outcome (Landry2003).Outcome expectation is thus a belief about the consequences of a behaviour. Individuals with positive outcome expectations are likely to have strong self-efficacy beliefs.Self-efficacy reflects individuals' beliefs about whether they can achieve a given level of successful at a particular task (Bandura, 1989). Students with greater self-efficacy are more confident in their abilities to be successful when compared to their peers with lower self-efficacy. Self-efficacy has proven useful for understanding students' motivation and achievement in academic contexts. Higher levels of perceived self-efficacy have been associated with greater choice, persistence, and with more effective strategy use (Pajares, …show more content…
Children from low socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds are often challenged in both domains, relative to peers who are not economically disadvantaged.In addition, results are consistent with previous studies that show that poverty or low socioeconomic status has a negative effect on language skills and that children from low SES families are more likely to experience limited language and cognitive stimulation from the home environment. Results show that these children have smaller vocabulary sizes, less complex syntactic knowledge and less sophisticated knowledge of story structure than normative
Children in families with lower incomes at or below the poverty line have been connected with poor cognitive and social development in early childhood. The studies that I chose to use evaluate the cognitive and social development during early childhood using various surveys, evaluations, and observations completed by or with the children, parents, and teachers. Development of any kind is dependent on the interplay of nature and nurture, or genetics and environment. These studies draw from a child’s environment during the earliest years of development, specifically birth, pre-school, and early elementary school. The studies propose living in an impoverished environment as opposed to an environment above the poverty line imposes certain restrictions on cognitive and social development during early childhood.
Pungello, E.P., Iruka, I.U., Dotterer, A.M., Mills-Koonce, R., & Reznick, S. (2009). The effects of socioeconomic status, race, and parenting on language development in early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 544-557.
Locke, Edwin A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Personnel Psychology, 50 (3), 801-804. Retrieved May 2, 2011, from ProQuest Psychology Journals. (Document
According to Bandura (1977), self-efficacy is mediated by a person's beliefs or expectations about his/her capacity to accomplish certain tasks successfully or demonstrate certain behaviors (Hackett and Betz 1981). Bandura postulates that these expectations determine whether or not a certain behavior or performance will be attempted, the amount of effort the individual will contribute to the behavior, and how long the behavior will be sustained when obstacles are encountered (ibid.).
Self-efficacy is the belief that someone has the inherent ability to achieve a goal. A student who has a high self-efficacy allows himself to believe that he can be successfully academically.(Bozo & Flint, 2008) He believes that a challenging problem is a task that can be mastered This student is more committed to work in the classroom. (Schunk,1991). On the other hand, a student who has a low level of self-efficacy is likely to be academically motivated. He is more likely to avoid a task that is difficult, give up, make excuses, or lose confidence in his abilities (Margolis & McCabe, 2006). This failure becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Teachers need to find ways to motivate these students by increasing their self-efficacy.
The emphasis on social interaction influencing cognitive development impacts on how students are taught. Class room environments need to allow social interaction as a key part of learning activities. This social interaction permits students to learn from both the teacher and their peers through collaborative activities. Teachers that encourage discussion will lead students to think critically and this will assist in providing meaning to new information. (Powell & Kalina, 2009 p245)
Families of higher socioeconomic statuses are able to provide extensive cognitive stimulation in the form of language stimulation, teaching colors and numbers, providing books and learning materials, and exposing the child to learning experiences outside the home (Conger, Conger, & Martin, 2010). Families of low socioeconomic status may not have the financial resources to provide learning materials, or have the time to provide cognitive stimulation to their child. Research shows that children growing up in poverty have less access to learning materials, educational opportunities, and are exposed to lesser words and conversations (Johnson, Noble, & Riis, 2016). These deficits in environmental stimuli relating to language and higher-order thinking could account for the smaller volumes, surface areas, and resulting functional capacities of the left occipitotmeporal, perisylvian, and prefrontal cortex regions in children of low socioeconomic
Students often struggle to challenge themselves and take ownership over their own learning and growth. Therefor, it is important to provide students the tools to form a positive outlook towards learning with the hope that students will believe in their ability to achieve. Therefor my research question is this; Can differentiated task based menus with choices geared to readiness level increase fourth grade student’s self-efficacy and skill in math? I expected that by providing students with a differentiated instruction based menu students would feel a sense of power, ownership, and self-efficacy over their own learning. In addition, I hoped that increased self-efficacy would increase student learning as attribution theory suggests should be
My self-efficacy for learning is very high. I have never entered a course and felt as if it was impossible for me to learn if I put in the amount of time necessary to perform well in the class. This is mainly due to my personal behavior history with educational classes and coursework. In my previous courses, I have always performed well and grown in my knowledge in correlation with how hard I have worked in the course. My hard work and ability has generally produced results that I am happy with, and at this point, when it fails to, it has little effect on my self-efficacy for learning overall.
Increasing feelings of self-efficacy can increase intrinsic motivation. Self-efficacy is an individual’s belief in their ability to succeed at a given task or situation. Someone with a strong sense of self-efficacy believed that they can handle whatever is thrown at them. When their friend invites them to a new spin class, they are excited to go, because they believe that they can be successful in the class. These people don’t back down from a challenge, they face it head on and enjoy working towards something new.
During our lifetime, we will be faced with challenges. These challenges we face give us two options. We can either rise above and accomplish the set goal, or give up in defeat. Self-efficacy is the belief in our own abilities to achieve these goals in life (Ormrod, 2013). Self-efficacy is not the only thing that affects the performance of a student, self-regulation also plays a role.
The concept of self-efficacy is grounded in Bandura’s (1977) social learning theory. Bandura (1994) defines perceived self-efficacy as “people’s beliefs about their capabilities to produce efforts” (p. 71). In essence, one having strong self-efficacy experience increase in motivation, accomplishment, and personal well-being ( Bandura, 1994). Those with a low sense of self-efficacy, on the other hand, often suffer stress and depression; unbelieving of their capabilities and often succumbed to failure (Bandura, 1994).
The cause of avoidance of failure could be due to the low self-efficacy. This can be explained by the attribution theory, which deals with students-perceived causes of success and failure in school tasks. Self-efficacy (Bandura, 1997) refers to the individual’s expectation of success at a particular task. Students’ perception of the causes for their success and failure at their school assignment will then have a direct impact on their motivation to try (Stipek, 2002). This can be seen in my students in which the negative feelings of self-efficacy has caused them see little value in trying as they believe that they are likely to fail.
Self‐efficacy is defined as “the belief in one's capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to produce given attainments” (Bandura, 1997, p. 3). Research shows a teacher’s sense of efficacy correlates with student achievement (Ashton & Webb, 1986). Mounting research supports Bandura's (1977) theory that teacher' self-efficacy beliefs correlate with work ethic and investment in teaching, goal-setting for themselves and their students, and their tenacity in overcoming challenges (Ashton & Webb, 1986;
The researchers have also found that students with higher academic expectations had better academic performance and experience less stress. Students who experienced more stress tended to have greater health problems and worse adjustment. Hence, it is concluded that self-efficacy showed powerful relationships to academic performance and personal adjustment of the first-year college students, in both direct and indirect