The article “Schools Start Offering Students Cash for Better Grades” contains a video and dialogue from John Tulenko, representative of Learning Matters Television, and participants. It is an interview discussing cash rewards with a principal from an elementary school, reporter, and students between third and sixth grade. Topics such as should students get paid for studying, concerns about cash rewards, will it be placing teacher at a disadvantage, and students’ performance erodes is answered in the article. The use of an experiment, results from the experiment, and emotion was given to convey the argument whether the use of cash incentives for higher grades and test scores can be beneficial or detrimental.
The experiment was taking a certain number of students from the third to sixth grade to use as participants that received cash incentives based on their test scores. This experiment was influenced by a program in Africa. The video included in this excerpt showed the excitement on the kid's faces when discussing the reward received after passing the state tests. They were excited and looking forward to studying harder for the next test. The money encouraged one student to go to bed early and study harder. Also, the principal
…show more content…
The argument conveyed must have been effective due to the schools that followed the trend to raise their test scores. Personally, I don’t think the author/ narrator was being biased because the excerpt was more like an interview and he was just asking questions from all points of view to the interviewees. The good and bad of the monetary system was being asked. The students even agreed their performance would not have been outstanding if the money wasn’t involved. The interviewer asked questions that could be blamed on the teachers to the teachers. He was a well-rounded
In “Grades and Money,” Steven Vogel makes it clear that he is disappointed and frustrated with what grades have become. He believes that grades have become commoditized and that students’ grades suffer because of their relation with money. Vogel also believes that students no longer take any risk with their education. I agree with Vogel that grades are being equated to money by students, that students’ work suffers because of grades, and that students no longer take risks in their educational process.
Did you know that schools in some places are actually giving kids money for good grades? If schools wish students to be self-motivated and have a desire for learning because it’s valuable to them, then schools should not pay students for excellent grades. Paying students for good grades can lead to kids having pressure to earn good grades. In addition, the students who are payed will not succeed academically in the long run. Also, they are not self-motivated so when they are not getting paid they will stop trying. From pressuring to get good grades, not succeeding academically in the long run, and not having self-motivation, there are several negative effects of paying students for marvelous grades.
Some parents reward their child for the outstanding grades on their report card; nowadays schools have programs which reward the students instead of the parents. The Cash for Grades Program is a program which rewards cash incentives to all hard-working students in the school system. This program is “jointly funded by public money and private donations” (“Cash for Grades”). People from the community or successful companies financially support this program because they understand the role of education in a child’s life, even if it will cost them to donate money for the children. “At each evaluation, they can earn $50 for every A they receive, $35 for each B and $20 for every C” (“Cash for Grades”). The goal of the program is to reach out and help children from all social classes, either by cash or motivation. Many programs like the Cash for Grades Program such as Gr...
Would you pay your child for getting good grades?, or would you like to get paid for your good grades? Parents have payed their children for their proficiency several times, and people are starting to realize what a magnificent idea this is. People believe that this can make kids try harder and it can help them gain more knowledge. Others think this could be an unsuitable theory because it makes kids only want to learn for the money. In my opinion, paying kids for good grades is an excellent suggestion.
“Why can’t I make money for going to school? ” That’s a common complaint from most students. However, in my opinion students shouldn’t be paid for school. Students shouldn’t be paid for grades, because it weakens their natural enthusiasm for learning and more. First of all, it will give kids a lower academic performance in the long run. Second of all, it’s artificial learning to offer unrelated incentive. And third of all, the child’s enthusiasm is dampened. By giving students lower academic performances in the long run, offering unrelated incentive, and dampening their natural enthusiasm are the main reasons that we shouldn’t pay students for grades.
All the students rush out the door as the school bell rings, taking out their extravagant and expensive phones. Everyone leaves, and just by the sight of the empty hallway, there are calculators, textbooks and more electronics that are worth a great amount of money. Students are not responsible for their belongings. In fact, they are not responsible at all, losing them, leaving them in the hallways and change rooms unattended, dropping them. They will never entirely understand the value and responsibility that is put forth for them to have that phone. However, they would understand if the phone was bought with their own money. This leads to why students should be paid for having good grades in school. Students should be paid for good grades due to these three reasons: it encourages students to work harder, it will help expand and grow the economy and finally, they will understand the importance of responsibility.
middle of paper ... ... Therefore, I feel strongly that there are many other factors, other than standardized test scores, that contribute to student performance in education. I came across a comprehensive nine-year study of testing and evaluation commissioned by the National Academy of Sciences that recently concluded that: “available evidence does not give strong support for the use of test-based incentives to improve education.” (ParentAcrossAmerica).
Many of my peers have told me that their parents pay them a dollar for every A that they receive on their report card. That concept of paying students for high grades has spread across the nations. Schools now use cash to motivate students to do well in school. Though yes, this is effective, but is it right? Has this truly benefited the students as much as we think it does? The answer to both questions is no. It takes away a child’s natural desire to learn, it doesn’t work out in the long run, and it ruins teacher-student relationships. Paying students for high grades is a terrible idea because it takes away a child’s intrinsic motivation, creates conflict between students and teachers, and doesn’t work out in
Money. Who doesn’t like getting rewarded with money? As for me, I know a few kids who are getting paid but not because they’re tutoring, babysitting, or doing their chores, but because their school is paying them. Crazy right? Well at this moment, a couple of schools are paying their students to get good grades, which may affect the students terribly later on. Examples could be either because kids don’t get their education or because it won’t give them their desired grades.
Students should be paid for having good grades. According to Psychology Today the United States has fallen behind other nations in education. In addition to this, approximately every one in four students in the U.S. drops out of school before graduation. The main reason for this is that students have little to no motivation. Students are either bored by school, or they are distracted by the other things that go on in their lives such as sports, jobs, friends and their own family life. Although learning has its own rewards, some students respond better to money. This essay explains how students will be paid and the reasons that they should receive money for getting good grades. Some reasons that students should be paid are: if students received rewards for having good grades fewer students would drop out, graduates would be better educated, people would seek higher education, less crime would be committed, less people would rely on the government and graduates would be more qualified for better jobs.
Some kids come to school thinking school is just a waste of time, but if parents add a reward for their grades then it may just change their mind about school. Yes, it sometimes is boring, but if you are getting paid for good grades then, that payment can go to their college savings or to some new item they want. A staggering 69% of people on Debate.com say that kids should get paid for getting good grades because they think it will motivate the kids to learn and get them used to get paid just like they were in a job. While the lower 31% of people say that students should not get paid because”kids have no entitlement to such payment”.
Students Should Not Be Paid For Grades I’m going to talk about my opinion and reasoning on why students shouldn’t be paid for what their grades are. I think this because it causes pressure and stress on teachers and students. It can create conflict between parents and students. Also, it does not change how kids do on their tests. Let me explain why.
Are you ready to be rich just by taking a test? Schools need to offer cash incentives to students who earn good test scores. Students will gives more effect, poorer students can support themselves and their family, and it will teach students better financial skills. These advantages can help high school students succeed more not only in high school, but after high school too.
They think this will make school more like the real world, where people earn money for working hard. Students might do better if they get immediate rewards’’. If this idea is taken seriously the amount of people improving in school can increase
My sister got paid $100 for all A’s. I dont think its right because she should feel good about her hard work. Students she not be paid for good grades because it take away their attention and motivation. One reason paying for good grades is bad because classroom problems. Another reason is student would never understand the joy of learning.