Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should students be paid for good grades
How can academics be effected by peer pressure
Should students be paid for good grades
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should students be paid for good grades
Students Should Not Be Paid For Grades
I’m going to talk about my opinion and reasoning on why students shouldn’t be paid for what their grades are. I think this because it causes pressure and stress on teachers and students. It can create conflict between parents and students. Also, it does not change how kids do on their tests. Let me explain why.
First of all, a quote from the article called “Cash for Grades” says, “It causes pressure and stress on the teachers because it can create problems in their classrooms.” Not only that, but it takes a while to go through all of the students’ work, giving them grades, and checking how much each of them had earned.
Also, it can create stress on the principal as well because he/she has to provide the money to give to the students. It gives the kids pressure because they want to get good grades anyway and now they are getting money for it?! Of course they are going to have pressure to raise their grade! Some students might even try to cheat off of other people more often than usual. most Americans, and many educators, still feel uncomfortable with the idea (N-CFG).
It causes conflict because students could brag to other kids around them about how much money they are making. Also, the kids could spend the money on things that they do not need and their parents can get mad at them for that
…show more content…
Simply playing kids for good grades or test scores doesn’t actually give them any more skills, (N-CFG). They do not go up, they do not go down. They just stay the exact same as they were before. Some might differ here and there, overall it just doesn’t change. Paying kids won’t get them to study. It doesn’t mean they will spend extra time on it or anything. Barbara Marinak, an assistant professor of education at Penn State University, says the research on monetary rewards is quite clear: They don’t work. “Any type of ‘extrinsic’ reward, by and large, undermines motivation,”
What happens when students hear this new mode of grading and stop trying? What is the challenge of going to school and working hard, if they do not have to make sure they get all of their school work done to pass? Teachers will not need to try so hard to get their lecture through to their audience. Although allowing the no zero rule helps children in many ways, it hurts them in more ways. In society there are no grading scales, no one is going to give these young students an easy pass. If they cannot do what they are supposed to do in their career, then they will fail. These students need to understand the meaning of working hard to achieve in school, so they understand what it will be like with a job, or family. Most jobs run on a pass or fail scale. It is easy to think that changing the grading scale is what the students need, and that this will give parents what they are looking for to stop the children from dropping out of
A nationwide investigation also reviled school across the nation were involved in changing test scores. In order to stop this cruel and I think criminal intent on our children we must understand different learning habits. Also understand the environment of the child. The environment plays a strong role in how our children learn and are able to grasp what is being taught. Most importantly we must be patient. Every child does not learn one the same level. We are all different in so many ways. The teaching outline should reflect our unique characteristics. Let’s use the universalization test. What would the United States be like if every educator changed test scores? We would be a nation of inadequate uneducated individuals. We have an unwavering responsibility to our children.
This system directly links test scores to teacher pay, meaning that if a student scores higher than he or she did last year, this year’s teacher would receive a better rating, and thus better pay. But if a student scores lower than he or she did last year, or doesn’t improve enough, that student would lower the teacher’s rating; even if that student got every question correct, he or she could still count against the teacher if his or her predicted score is higher than the possible score (this actually happens more often than you would think).
The Consequences of Grade Inflation When students arrive at university, professors expect them to understand the material to an exceptional standard. The problem is that grade inflation is occurring more regularly in secondary schools and universities across the country and when these students’ marks are sent to universities or colleges, the student may be given multiple scholarships for something that he/she should not have earned. Grade inflation is conceived between both students and teachers, meaning that the students are given higher grades when they have inadequate learning, reading, and verbal skills, while the teachers do not have to grade as many papers as they should in the real curriculum. There have been multiple examinations that have confirmed that grade inflation is very real and still occurs today. Students seem to think that they do not need to put forth much effort in school to do well, and grade inflation encourages this thought.
Because of this, the schools test scores will be flawed and that will not look well on the school. If the school just took a little time for the kid to calm down and get themselves under control I bet their test scores would look better. Parents may say test scores are what we were judged by, so there must be evidence that shows test are accurate? According to the National Research Council report they found no evidence test-based incentive programs are working: "Despite using them for several decades, policymakers and educators do not yet know how to use test-based incentives to consistently generate positive effects on achievement and to improve education." Also, in the manner of questioning test says the New York Times, “There is also the question of whether any standardized test is adequate or needed to evaluate certain sorts of student
Students should be paid for having good grades. According to Psychology Today, the United States has fallen behind other nations in education. In addition to this, approximately one in four students in the U.S. drops out of school before graduation. The main reason for this is that students have little to no motivation. Students are either bored with school, or they are distracted by the other things that go on in their lives such as sports, jobs, friends and their own family life.
Remember back in school when your parents would bribe you to get all A’s in your classes? Although it may seem like a good idea to pay students for grades, in the long run it just wouldn’t work out. If students were to be paid for good grades the price would be far too high, parents already pay taxes, and school is a privilege that should be taken advantage of.
Why do baseball players, who play sports that were invented for fun, earn a 1,000 times more than teachers who work to teach and guide our youth to be successful citizens? Jobs like school teacher, police officer, doctor, firefighter, and construction worker - all who perform duties that we can’t live without - are paid considerably less than professional athletes, nationally acclaimed entertainers, and actors. Teachers hold a major role in the educational system and without them most people would not be able to function properly in life. Why is it that teachers are paid less than professional athletes? Educators deserve a more comparable salary than they receive because they are beneficial to life, make people successful, and help people grow.
Secondly, students should not be paid for outstanding grades since it takes away kids’ natural desire to learn. One quote from research by Edward Deci and others this, “Most children are motivated to learn. Promise of external rewards dampened.” This leads to children not enjoying learning, merely just for the money. The effect of this is that children won’t learn, only caring for money. To sum up, it takes away the natural desire to
Also there will always be limits to who will get these awaords and who dosent really deserve them. Those who show up and acwelly try to stay and get things done should get rewarded. Also if more kids geting rewarded it will drive other kids into wanting to get that reward as well. So even though your rewarding something small it will drive other kids to achieve the same
In conclusion, students should be paid to do well in school because it has many benefits to the student. Those benefits include motivation to get good grades, the money would help the student financially, and the student would learn how to manage their money more effectively. School is a big part of every person’s life, so it should be more rewarding to the
This in turn will cause the students to have a harder time learning because instead of the teachers teaching what the students need to be taught and more time teaching what the people who don’t know what the students know think the students should be taught. One example of this is, if a student already knows how to write a narrative but the standardized curriculum requires them to teach how to write a narrative it would be a big waste of time having to cover it that deeply if the students had already learned it. If those people would not have stepped in then the teacher could have moved faster and taught the students something they actually needed to be taught, such as how to write a argumentative essay (Paying teachers for student test scores damages schools and undermines learning) (Does Merit Pay For Teachers Have Merit? Pros And Cons Of New Models For Teacher Compensation). In the 2011-2012 school year (the year when they tried implementing performance/merit pay in idaho and many other states) the sat scores actually went down very slightly, or did not change at all --the score did not go up like the it was supposed to (Idaho ED
Teachers and school reputations will remain high. Teachers and schools want to give a good impression and in order to do that they need to produce something that all students want, a good grade. Some say grade inflation helps show students they are smart and capable of working hard and receiving good grades. This motivates them to work harder to keep those high grades. Grade inflation also gives students the opportunity to apply them selves to the next level University.
Paying students for their good grades is, an appalling idea due to the fact that there chances for cheating increases highly, it may cause conflict within the teachers and students, and the money may seem like bribery to the students. Paying students is an awful idea due to the fact their chances of cheating increases highly. Students start to cheat off their peers or classmates because they want money too. In addition, it’s not fair for the other students that have good grades because they would be working so hard while they’re being copied by the other students who have lower grades. As a result, the more the learners cheat, the more consequences there would be.
Grading tends to take its toll early in life. It forecloses on the hopes and aspirations of many students and causes them to decreases academic ranks, lower social status, and reduced employment possibilities before their potential has a chance to be proven. With this disposition children don't believe their academic efforts have any solution. Also, once grades are put into their record, students tend to be conditioned to receive them. With this disposition children don't believe their academic efforts have any payoff.